Jump to content

User talk:LCF2023

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chaotic Enby was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 00:36, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, LCF2023! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 00:36, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Saying only right leaning sources are not reliable, especially when Long COVID is not a right leaning cause, doesn't make much sense to me since they are major publications reporting against something they wouldn't want to promote. It seems bias on the reviewer's part. As for the quotations, they are invaluable first person accounts of the notable's Long COVID battles and Wikipedia is full of quotations. They should remain in and are very important. Additionally, every single person listed has a source, which I painstakingly added. I can review and see if there is anyone that should be removed, but I defined what notable meant in this regard in the beginning part of the page. I would appreciate another reviewer on this thank you. LCF2023 (talk) 01:07, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's not all quotations, there is a good amount due to how important those are in relaying the details of their own Long COVID. It's a pretty important part of this. LCF2023 (talk) 01:08, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No, it's not about them being right-leaning or left-leaning, it's about them being tabloids known for their low verification standards. I suggest you take a look at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources for more information.
You did not define what criteria you meant by "notable", only saying that the list was curated by the Long COVID Foundation. What does that mean? A foundation doesn't have ownership of a Wikipedia page, and an account isn't allowed to represent an entire foundation but should be for a single person.
You are free to submit the article again to have the input of another reviewer. Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 01:24, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I removed the Daily Mail and The Sun as sources and better defined notable including the phrase "in the public eye" along with some of my explanation from before. The Long COVID Foundation page is being created soon. It's a Long COVID non-profit and part of what we do is bring more awareness to this serious health issue, hence the creation of this Wikipedia Page. LCF2023 (talk) 02:31, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It is recommended not to create articles about yourselves. Also, you're not allowed to have a "company" account, accounts should represent a single person. Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 10:19, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wikishovel was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Wikishovel (talk) 06:42, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This is not a list of any person with Long COVID like that one is. This is a list of notable people, which is important because people don't think the famous can get Long COVID, but they do. It's also incredibly more detailed, this took several days to do even with having already curated this information in the past, with an accurate description of Long COVID. Please reconsider. LCF2023 (talk) 19:01, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The first sentence of List of people with long COVID says This is a list of notable people with long COVID. I genuinely don't see the difference. Feel free to add information to the already existing list if you have good sourcing. Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 19:25, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
They're not all notable or athletes, etc.. One person is a person that's known for having Long COVID only. I know Long COVID quite well thus I'm aware. I've looked at that and I've curated this list a long time ago. There is a difference and this was brutal to compile and finish on Wikipedia. It's an important list for an important problem. Look forward to approval. 47.18.249.246 (talk) 19:54, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Shadow311 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Shadow311 (talk) 19:00, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, LCF2023. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of Notable People with Long COVID, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:06, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]