User talk:Kutlulev

This is Kutlulev's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (September 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Kutlulev/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Kutlulev/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-Liance^{talk/contribs} 02:35, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kutlulev! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -Liance^{talk/contribs} 02:35, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Article draft: Robin C. Sickles

@Kutlulev: I don't want to interfere with your current review request, but have a few ideas you may want to consider to make better progress before review. I would like to suggest you to read the Wikipedia:Notability and evaluate what makes the article notable (relevant for an article of its own). You should take extra care to add relevant sources to those statements. wp:BLP is also important and you should have a reference for birth so that there is no confusion.

Though the CV included is a way of indicating that you didn't make the statement up yourself, it's not an independent source. The "other 2008" is well sourced, you may complement that reference with a url, such as [1]. The award section is sometimes where the notability shows, so please add reference to each. In this case the awards seems to be "work interal" and it may not qualify for 3-rd party recognition, but a first step of evaluation is to have wp:verification. You may find that removing details sometimes makes the remaining statements stand out more, and the article more encyclopedic.

The other "Other" I'm not so sure how to interpret, especially those red-links - are they intended as "further read" and do you have more specific pointers then? Please clarify why the other section adds value and see if you can find a more specific name. Maybe "recognition" when selectively merged with the "award" section.

It may not be a requirement, but you show that you know about the cite-templates, and they are very often used within the ref-tags as well. Doing so gives references a unified look, and also helps you see what meta information that is often given. {{cite web}} etc. can be used for non-journals.

Among the many guidelines for Wp is WP:SELFPROMOTE and I suggest you check that too and consider your involvement. If the article meets notability, I think it could be ok for you to create the first draft, but you should question if the last entry in "Selected publications" is biased or not. I however guess that you should be very restrictive about making an article from anything like this sandbox edit.

@Liance: I hope you don't mind me clarifying the expectations a bit. Not all of my suggestions may be needed for an "accept", but I wanted to give some hints also for upcoming reviews. Thanks for your work for new users. JAGulin (talk) 08:39, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not a problem Jagulin, I really appreciate you taking the time to help users with their draft articles so thoroughly. The suggestions you noted are extremely helpful. Thank you! Best, -Liance^{talk/contribs} 19:09, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Liance: Thanks a lot. I tried to follow your advice as much as possible. @Jagulin: Thanks a lot. I tried to follow your advice as much as possible.

September 2019

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Robin Sickles, from its old location at User:Kutlulev/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 19:25, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robin Sickles (December 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Missvain was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Thank you so much for your contributions to Wikipedia!

Please replace as many of sources with reliable secondary sources ABOUT the subject, or in which the subject is featured as a subject matter expert (not as the writer), with magazine articles, newspaper articles, television interviews or features, or publications from notable journals, books, or other publications.

If you are unable to find any reliable secondary sources (learn more here: WP:Reliable), please consider editing other Wikipedia articles about economists, there are so many that can be improved!

Thank you once more, for contributing to Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Robin Sickles and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Robin Sickles, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Missvain (talk) 00:18, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robin Sickles (January 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

needs independent sources

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Robin Sickles and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Robin Sickles, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 19:05, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Robin Sickles has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Robin Sickles. Thanks! DGG ( talk ) 11:01, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robin Sickles has been accepted

Robin Sickles, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 01:00, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]