User talk:Krd
Hi Krd. When you added {{Permission ticket}} to this file's page, you changed the licensing for the file but didn't change {{Non-free rationale logo}} to {{Information}}; so, a bot noticed this conflict and tagged the with {{Wrong license}} for further review. I've cleaned this up, but just want to verify whether the VRT ticket applies to the originally uploaded version of the logo or just the reduced version of the logo.
When the file was originally uploaded, it was uploaded with a non-free license but without a non-free use rationale. A Wikipedia administrator named Explicit subsequently reviewed the file and added the missing rationale, but by then a bot had already reduced the file and tagged the older version for speedy deletion per WP:F5. If the VRT ticket for the file applies to all versions of the logo, the older deleted version can be restored per WP:REFUND, and the file then moved to Commons; on the other hand, if the ticket applies only to the reduced version of the logo, then I think only that version can be moved to Commons.
I don't mind asking Explicit to restore the older version, but I just want to make sure it's OK to do so. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:33, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- The VRT ticket applies to the original file. --Krd 03:37, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Refund requested. Krd 03:52, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for clarifying and thanks for asking for the refund. -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:12, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Refund requested. Krd 03:52, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted file was reuploaded
[edit]Hello, I noticed that you deleted File:Drew MacEwen (cropped).png on Commons. Someone reuploaded the same file on Wikipedia here, again with no evidence of permission. Is there any way you could delete this reupload? Thanks! BottleOfChocolateMilk (talk) 16:19, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- No, I'm no admin of English Wikipedia. Krd 16:21, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
HL7406 and JA8061 Photo
[edit]Hi @Krd. I uploaded three photos to Commons, and has permission, but stil haven't reviewed. Can you review it ? 250px 250px 250px Tô Ngọc Khang (talk) 15:54, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Already done by somebody. Krd 16:22, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- It's still show that:
- This file, which was originally posted to an external website, has not yet been reviewed by an administrator or reviewer to confirm that the above license is valid. See Category:License review needed for further instructions. Tô Ngọc Khang (talk) 03:19, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- This is not relevant, the files have been approved. --Krd 07:44, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- From my perspective, they were still waiting for license review. They were approved by a VRT agent (me), but not by a license reviewer (not me). One verification might be sufficient, but two (of different kinds) would be stronger. Whym (talk) 11:55, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- VRT permission is stronger than LR, so LR is not required. Krd 16:57, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- I don't dispute that another approval is not required. But don't you see any additional value? For one thing, public evidence is easier to verify for a larger number of people. Whym (talk) 12:46, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- I see more risk to create a precedent for such double verification, which id not manageable at large scale. Krd 14:34, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- I don't dispute that another approval is not required. But don't you see any additional value? For one thing, public evidence is easier to verify for a larger number of people. Whym (talk) 12:46, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- VRT permission is stronger than LR, so LR is not required. Krd 16:57, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- From my perspective, they were still waiting for license review. They were approved by a VRT agent (me), but not by a license reviewer (not me). One verification might be sufficient, but two (of different kinds) would be stronger. Whym (talk) 11:55, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- This is not relevant, the files have been approved. --Krd 07:44, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm trying to add an on Shuah Khan, Can you help? Thanks. AbdulRahim2002 (talk) 17:43, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- I don't think so, but just is case, what is your exact request? Krd 19:08, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- I am not sure why it is not being accepted. Can you help me get it to main space. AbdulRahim2002 (talk) 18:15, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- No, I can't. But the review is still pending, so perhaps it just need some more time. Krd 06:46, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- I am not sure why it is not being accepted. Can you help me get it to main space. AbdulRahim2002 (talk) 18:15, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
File:Boeing 707 "Stratoliner", 3rd 707-121 production airplane, N709PA, later delivered to Pan Am.jpg
[edit]Hi @Krd. Do you think this photo is Public Domain and there in nothing suspicious about it ? in User @RecycledPixeIs opinion, PD-US is seem suspicious and this user want to delete it. See Talk:Pan Am Flight 214#Boeing 707 "Stratoliner", 3rd 707-121 production airplane, N709PA, later delivered to Pan Am.jpg Tô Ngọc Khang (talk) 13:41, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- I don't know. If you think is it not PD, please nominate for deletion. Krd 14:10, 9 October 2024 (UTC)