User talk:Khánum Gül

Welcome!

Hello, Khánum Gül, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum, see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:21, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Khánum Gül, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:21, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Common names

Hi @Khánum Gül:, we haven't interacted directly yet I don't think, but I've been really appreciating many of your contributions on Baha'i related pages, particularly with regards to source quality and NPOV issues. I have been active on WP for 15+ years—largely as an IP editor or under some old accounts—but have been gone for a few years and am just getting active again. I'm particularly trying to contribute to some pages on the history of Babism, reduce dependence on Nabíl's Narrative as the main source for articles about individuals who ae actually quite well covered in other sources. I'm also interested and well-versed in Mormon history and the history of librarianship and am working on some projects in those areas too.

I wanted to check in about naming conventions, I'm noticing you titling some pages with relatively obscure Arabic or Persian names that either don't show up outside of specialist literature, or in come cases are really hard to find in English language sources at all. In my understanding, WP:COMMONNAME policies mean we should be using the names that show up most often in reliable, accessible English language sources. Now, that doesn't mean we should ignore terminology used in Baha'i studies, nor make the Iranian origins of the subjects invisible. I suspect however that using Arabic/Persian terms which almost no anglophones familiar with the Baha'i Faith would have heard of for otherwise notable subjects reduces the accessibility and usefulness of the encyclopedia's coverage of Baha'i topics.

I just changed Bayt-i-'Aẓam to House of Bahá'u'lláh in Baghdad because all the cited sources used that or a very similar phrase to refer to the subject.

I figured before making any other changes I should just open a dialogue so we could consult and make sure that good faith editors aren't working at cross purposes and make sure any changes I make aren't perceived as critical when I'm actually really appreciating all your work here. Peace, penultimate_supper 🚀 ^{(talk • contribs)} 16:58, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear @Penultimate supper,

Thank you for your kind words and constructive feedback. I respect your long-standing contributions to Wikipedia and acknowledge that, as a user seeking to understand the guidelines better, I would need your help and guidance. Please feel free to correct any mistakes I may have made. I welcome constructive criticism and look forward to hearing from you.

Regards, Khánum Gül (talk) 14:49, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Paragraphs and Periods moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Paragraphs and Periods. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hey man im josh (talk) 20:16, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear @Hey man im josh,

Thank you for reviewing the article. I believe the notability of this subject is evident, as many academic sources have been written about this 11th-century book (there is also an article on its native Arabic Wikipedia). For the record, I have added three more peer-reviewed sources to a new section titled "Further Reading" to further demonstrate its notability. I apologize for leaving this article at a minimal level for the time being; I am currently working on another article and created this one primarily to turn some red links into blue (which have reverted back to red again). If you agree that this book is notable, I kindly ask that you consider publishing the article again. Thank you. Khánum Gül (talk) 16:06, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Me moving it to draft space does not prohibit you from disagreeing and moving it back. You are welcome to publish the article yourself if you have added additional sources and believe it to be notable. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:20, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for elaborating. I republished the article and will try to improve it accordingly. Khánum Gül (talk) 18:37, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]