User talk:Kevin mitnik fake

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Marianna251TALK 12:38, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

Hello, I'm LynxTufts. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Draft:First Draft have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. It looks like you may have unintentionally overwritten someone else's old draft - if so, you are free to recreate what you wrote as a new draft. LynxTufts (talk) 18:45, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove information from articles, as you did to Sanjay Singh. Wikipedia is not censored, and content is not removed on the sole grounds of perceived offensiveness. Please discuss this issue on the article's talk page to reach consensus rather than continuing to remove the disputed material. If the content in question involves images, you also have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide the images that you may find offensive. Thank you. Marianna251TALK 12:37, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. Wikipedia is not censored. Any further changes which have the effect of censoring an article, such as you did to Sanjay Singh, will be regarded as vandalism. If you continue in this manner, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Marianna251TALK 12:41, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Sanjay Singh.

Please stop attempting to whitewash the article. It would seem likely that you have a conflict of interest so I suggest that you confine yourself to suggesting improvements on the article talk page. Sitush (talk) 15:36, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Raj Singh Verma moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Raj Singh Verma, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. Dial911 (talk) 07:17, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Raj Singh Verma (February 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Heliosxeros was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Raj Singh Verma and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Raj Singh Verma, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

EROS ^message 10:48, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kevin mitnik fake! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! EROS ^message 10:48, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for disruptive editing

You have been blocked for two weeks for continuing to add unsourced content to Ameeta Singh and Sanjay Singh, and to remove well-sourced negative content while using misleading edit summaries, despite the warnings above. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bishonen | talk 11:31, 6 February 2018 (UTC).[reply]

Only warning

Your first edit since being unblocked was to go and remove content here from Ameeta Singh and with a reason that is not sufficient. Please discuss any changes you want to make first before you make them. Continuing to cause disruptive edits will result in a longer block being placed on your account. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 09:56, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Raj Singh Verma

Hello, Kevin mitnik fake. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Raj Singh Verma.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 17:27, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]