User talk:Kelemm24

Barnes & Noble

Hi. Regarding your edit to Barnes & Noble, where in the source you cited is information found supporting this passage: "the prominent Starbucks logo is sometimes confusing for customers wanting to use their Starbucks Stored-Value Cards or Gold Card, which are not accepted"? Nightscream (talk) 07:33, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your message. I wasn't meaning to cite the statement about customer confusion, but rather that "Certain Starbucks-branded locations may not permit you to use the Starbucks Card for payment, including some airport, grocery and bookstore locations" (from the 1st section of the T&C.) I know that B&N isn't listed specifically here, but the customer service number listed right afterwards will tell anyone who calls that Starbucks cards aren't accepted there. Is that not enough? I honestly wasn't sure if I should have cited that part of the paragraph, so please let me know what you think. I'm fairly new to this and really appreciate any advice! Kelemm24 (talk) 23:30, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If the source doesn't mention B&N, then the material should not be placed in the B&N article. It might be more appropriate for the Starbucks article. Nightscream (talk) 05:39, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks! I guess I'll just adjust the article instead or try to find a different printed source. Kelemm24 (talk) 07:36, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

After a very quick Google search, I pretty much only found a billion first person accounts and no official statement from either company. I just took out the part about Starbucks cards and will let the person who added it try to find a reliable source if they think it should go back in. Kelemm24 (talk) 08:01, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]