User talk:Keith Azzopardi

Welcome!

Hello, Keith Azzopardi, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! ¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 00:08, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

On Again...Off Again lyrics

I've responded to your question on the article's Talk page, but in case you don't see it I'll repeat the response here. Basically, hosting the lyrics here would be a violation of copyright (although quoting from them, as I have in the article, isn't). There's a link in the infobox to Diggiloo.net's copy of the lyrics, though. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 21:57, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:AzzopardiCoatofArms.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:AzzopardiCoatofArms.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:41, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Website

Can a user insert his website adress, or is it illegal on wiki, because he'll be advertising his own site? {{helpme}}

It's almost always prohibited. Check out our guidelines on conflict of interests, spamming and external links. If you think your website is relevant to the article it is a good idea to post it on the talk page and ask the other editors around to see if they think it's ok to add. ---J.S ^(T/C) 22:36, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Adding a new feature

I have decided to include my website adress in my userpage, so I've taught it would be better if I first posted it on the talk page. According to Wikipedia:Userpage: You are welcome to include a link to your personal home page, although you should not surround it with any promotional language.

"Note: user pages are often reached through user signatures on talk pages."

For those of you who want to have look at my site, then add a comment, please do so at: http://www.keithazzopardi.tk NOTE: If no one would object within the next few days, I will add this link under an External Links subtitle to my userpage.

Barnstar

Thank you! It's nice to be appreciated! -- Eugène van der Pijll 15:22, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You'r Welcome! As long as you continue the good work....:-) Keith Azzopardi 15:35, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use disputed for Image:Ragelbilghaqal.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ragelbilghaqal.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:22, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Azzopardi2.jpg

Image Copyright problem

This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:Azzopardi2.jpg. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:02, 12 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 11:02, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Guzegalea.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Guzegalea.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 14:48, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Zmienlispanjoli.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Zmienlispanjoli.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 03:16, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

mt.wiki

I saw that you are from Malta.. why not participate also on the Maltese Wikipedia? Nistenna risposta mingћandek ;) Chrisportelli (talk) 06:03, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Marku Falzun

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Marku Falzun, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

No indication of real-world (or even fictional) notability.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Jfire (talk) 05:16, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedija bil-Malti

As a native Maltese speaker we encourage you to write in the Maltese version of the Wikipedia: mt.wiki.x.io
Leli Forte (talk) 13:18, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Keith Azzopardi! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 3 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Dennis Herring - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 21:36, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Zmienlispanjoli.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Zmienlispanjoli.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:07, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:29, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ġużè Galea for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ġużè Galea is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ġużè Galea until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 08:20, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]