User talk:Justthecu

August 2017

Hello, I'm Dairy501. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Good Clean Fun (band) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Dairy_{talk} 05:43, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Robinson Technologies. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Robinson Technologies was changed by Justthecu (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.850168 on 2017-08-30T06:05:18+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:05, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Good Clean Fun (band), you may be blocked from editing. Dairy_{talk} 07:41, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Justthecu, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Justthecu! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like AmaryllisGardener (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

20:03, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

September 2017

Hello, I'm PlyrStar93. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Pokémon— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. -★- PlyrStar93. _{→Message me. 🖉←} 00:05, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

~ GB fan 01:10, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Justthecu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sorry for the disruptiveness that my account has caused, just recently I made this account on Wikipedia to help the community. But I might've made a mistake when sharing my password to some of my friends who wanted to "help out". After I found out I was blocked, I immediately knew what happened. This time I am going to change my password and to not tell anyone, just please accept my appeal

Decline reason:

The vandalism started less than two minutes after you first registered your account, making your claim simply not plausible. Regardless, we wouldn't unblock your account even if your claim was plausible, as you have stated it's been compromised. As such, I'm revoking talk page access. Yamla (talk) 11:47, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Justthecu (talk) 07:15, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

How do we know you are the creator of the article and not one of the people the creator shared the password with? We do not unblock compromised accounts unless it can be confirmed the owner is back in control. ~ GB fan 10:20, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]