User talk:Juicebox 90

Welcome!

Hello, Juicebox 90, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! BracketBot (talk) 17:17, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Planned Parenthood may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

advocates agree that all acts of violence in the name of promoting a cause are unacceptable.<ref>{{Cite news |http://www.mediate.com/articles/prolifeC.cfm |work=reprinted from: Consensus, Harvard,

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:17, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Planned Parenthood may have broken the syntax by modifying 4 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

the black community and constructed in terms and with perceptions that today smack of racism.”<ref>{{cite newsletter|date=Fall,2001|issue=28||http://www.nyu.edu/projects/sanger/articles/bc_or_race_
classes, the feeble-minded, the mentally defective, [and] the poverty-stricken classes.”<ref>{{Cite Article.|origsource=Birth Control Review|origdate=Oct. 1921|page=5|url=https://www.nyu.edu/

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:55, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Catacombs may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

of popes, [[saint]]s and [[Christian martyrs|martyrs]] such as apostles [[St. Peter|Peter]] and [[St. Paul|Paul, placed in carved niches along the walls.<ref>”[http://www.bibleprobe.com, Christian

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:42, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Planned Parenthood

First, I reverted your changes to the Planned Parenthood article because the sum total was not neutral, misrepresenting abortion as a "social injustice", and giving too much weight to minor issues.

Second, the article is subject to administrative sanctions such that only one reversion is allowed per day. You should discuss your desired changes on the talk page, at Talk:Planned Parenthood, rather than revert back to your preferred version. If you violate the one reversion rule (1RR) you may be blocked by an administrator. Binksternet (talk) 00:28, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bias is not my intention here, but balance.

Since you found that "the sum total [of my edits] was not neutral," you must have found some of them to be neutral. I had credible sources for my edits.

It seemed to me in reading the current page that it does not have much balance and attempts to only show Planned Parenthood in a positive, rather than neutral light.

Under Margaret Sanger and Eugenics (Controversy and Criticism), the original text does not fully explain nor explore the facets of the controversy surrounding the subject. My sources from New York University and Planned Parenthood's leaflet help to provide a clearer understanding of the topic.

To clarify the comment about "social injustice," I meant that activists see abortion as a social injustice. I also contend that listing activist groups under Controversy and Criticism makes sense as they are the top contenders and critics. Juicebox 90 (talk) 22:57, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The issue of whether or not we include more information on Sanger's eugenics ideas has been discussed in the past and the consensus was that it be left out. That pertains more to her article than Planned Parenthood. As a parallel example, we don't mention that George Washington owned slaves in the American Revolutionary War article even though he was one of the founding fathers of the country and owned slaves. Efforts to do that would be reverted on the basis that it's not topical for that article. I'm am well aware of the efforts to by some pro-life groups to argue that Planned Parenthood is involved in genocide, but that's a fringe view. You can read up on WP:Fringe if you like.Mattnad (talk) 15:16, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Planned Parenthood is covered by discretionary sanctions under WP:ARBAB

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Abortion, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

EdJohnston (talk) 00:50, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Juicebox 90! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 02:26, Thursday, July 9, 2015 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Juicebox 90. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Happy Squirrel (talk) 03:08, 9 July 2015 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]