User talk:Jorge MG
I noticed all the edits you made to the steam locomotive class pages today. You didn't add any edit summaries so other editors would know what you were working on. Slambo (Speak) 16:56, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
Wrong decimal marker
[edit]RFFSA#Present day Brazilian railway companies This section originally had the wrong decimal marker, i.e. the comma. I have since corrected this by using 1000 & 1600 etc. Some translators can be careless. Peter Horn 18:17, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
- Thou sir, art the culprit, "This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Jorge MG (Talk | contribs) at 2008-12-11T15:55:08. It may differ significantly from the current revision." Peter Horn 18:31, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
In this edit you added various names to the UK section, including Thomas Mather Phillips, Harry Frank Robinson, Samuel Barrass Plant, John Edward Underhill, as 20th century executioners. I have not been able to find any reliable sources to support these names. Please could you say where you got these names from? Cusop Dingle (talk) 17:12, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
September 2013
[edit]Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Vampire literature may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- * "[[Lord Ruthven (vampire)|Lord Ruthwen ou les vampires]]" by [[Cyprien Bérard]] (often atrributed to [[Charles Nodier]] who as a matter of a fact only made the theater play of it (
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:15, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
February 2014
[edit]Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of executioners may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:32, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 6
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of executioners, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Portuguese and Carrasco (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, 10.4.0.34 (talk) 09:07, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
August 2014
[edit]Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of executioners may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "()"s and 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:54, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
September 2014
[edit]Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of executioners may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:08, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 3
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of executioners, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Butterworth. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 5
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of executioners, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Uri. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:41, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 27
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of executioners, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages George Mitchell, John Wilkinson and Samuel Haywood. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:31, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Please check links
[edit]Please check the links you are adding to the List of executioners to make sure that they are taking readers to the correct article. Please don't add links to disambiguation pages; instead, check the disambiguation page to find the relevant article. Thank you. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 15:50, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
For France, I will complete the list first as far as I have the names and after done I'll give a careful look at disambiguations and some other edits I've already realized I should do. Please let me proceed that way, otherwise I'll be unable to stay organized at what I'm doing. Guess by November 8, 20015 I should have everything ready about France's executioners; after that one I'll will give a similar closer look about Switzerland's, the UK's - urgently - and Germany's executioners.
Jorge
October 2015
[edit]Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of executioners may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:03, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 3
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- List of executioners
- added links pointing to Neufchâteau, Bruyère, Charmes and Civray
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
Allegra Versace
[edit]Just wanted to invite you to take a look at this weeks TAFI article Allegra Versace. Regards.--BabbaQ (talk) 18:20, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
You added a vast amount of information to this list. However, all the work you did is in hazard because you didn't add any sources to the many lists. You know how it is on Wikipedia: Unsourced information can be subject to deletion, and never mind how much hard work an editor has put into it. There already is a tag demanding sources, so your next step should be sourcing everything if you don't want your work to be undone, which would be a pity. ;) --Maxl (talk) 09:48, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Jorge MG. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Jorge MG. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)