User talk:Jmorrison230582/Archive 4
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Changes to Toronto Irish FC wiki page
Hi,
I have noted your proposal for deletion of the Toronto Irish wikipage. I wanted to make sure you were better informed about our team and therefore didn't consider it a "not notable pub team". I have added all the information where possible in the page, and your objection was useful in making me realise that there was information lacking. Thanks for bringing that to light.
TIFC is joining the TSSL for the 2010 season. This is the biggest and most prestigious amateur league in Toronto. I was able to easily find another TSSL team page (Morton FC) which has not been objected to. I'm sure there are others if I had time to look.
The club is properly run with a committee, constitution, bank accounts, and articles of association.
The organisation has been of enormous help to players that have arrived in the city with no network to call on. It's particularly useful for those who don't play GAA and would otherwise not be able to get involved in the sport they love. As far as we're aware, we're the only Irish specific football team in Toronto.
Thanks for highlighting what needed to be added to our page. If you're ever in Toronto you're welcome to come and see our team in action
Take care
Torontoirish (talk) 20:41, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
Patrick Dean(e)
Hello. Would you be able to confirm that Hibs' former under-19 player, recently joined Darlington, is spelt Patrick Deane with an 'e', as opposed to Patrick Dean (footballer) where the Darlo editor has created him? Darlington website says Deane, and there's no real reason to disbelieve them, other than general distrust of PTV club sites, but I don't want to start moving him unless I'm sure. thanks, Struway2 (talk) 11:24, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks. I'll move him. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 13:01, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
- And thanks again :-) I would have moved him, if I hadn't been failing to do five things at once on a seriously intermittent internet connection... cheers, Struway2 (talk) 14:38, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
DYK for Hibernian F.C. season 2001–02
Wikiproject: Did you know? 12:00, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
DYK for Tom Smith (footballer born 1909)
Materialscientist (talk) 12:00, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
John Hughes
I have yet to see a player/manager's clubs cited as you seem to think is appropriate anywhere on here. It's most certainly not the norm. I'm not sure how it is 'bizarre' to apply the median but I'll let the lack of AGF slide. In this case, citations are unnecessary, superflous and, if you want 'em up (whyever that may be) then I suggest we seek arbitration? --80.192.21.253 (talk) 13:06, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
GA reassessment of United Kingdom national football team
I have conducted a reassessment of the above article as part of the GA Sweeps process. You are being notified as you have made a number of contributions to the article. I have found some concerns which you can see at Talk:United Kingdom national football team/GA1. I have placed the article on hold whilst these are fixed. Thanks. Jezhotwells (talk) 15:42, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
Co-ownership (football)
Hi, thanks for contributing to co-ownership (football). I started the article after searching for co-ownership to find out how it worked, and got re-directed to third party ownership in association football; quite clearly not the same thing! Grateful for your help so far expanding the article, I just wondered if you could add anything further regarding the intricacies of co-ownership, particularly what happens if a third club wants to buy the player outright (as opposed to one of the co-owners buying out the other party). Many thanks in advance! Grunners (talk) 15:51, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
BLPs
Hello. When you re-tag BLPs as needing improved referencing, please would you use {{BLP sources}} (or {{BLP refimprove}}, which redirects there) rather than plain {{refimprove}}, so that the articles are still categorised as BLPs needing improving. thanks, Struway2 (talk) 10:53, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
Hibs honours
Hello. archive.org often comes in handy. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 11:07, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
?
Where´s the portuguese wiki? It´s all in english. Can't you read? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.144.188.135 (talk) 02:39, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
![](http://up.wiki.x.io/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/23/Nuvola_apps_edu_languages.svg/40px-Nuvola_apps_edu_languages.svg.png)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Please stop adding eastbourne to the profile. It is incorrect! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jjkeenan82 (talk • contribs) 10:08, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
Scott Mooney
Hello you proposed to delete my page and it said you can prevent it happening by removing the (Data Prod) what is this and how do i delete it, thanks.LiamTaylor007 (talk) 08:59, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
F10
Hi, recently you nominated File:James Vinnicombe next to FSMS poster in 2009.jpg for speedy delete using F10. F10 does not apply to pictures. For non encyclopedic images use WP:FFD. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:59, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: Sean Heinz
Hello Jmorrison230582. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Sean Heinz, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not blatantly vandalism or a hoax. Thank you. GedUK 19:07, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
BLP unreferenced tags
Hello Jmorrison230582. I wanted to ask if you would be willing to use the current date for the BLP unreferenced tags you are adding to old articles. I realize that some of these articles have not been referenced for many months or years, but we are trying to measure the progress at clearing the backlog of articles that have been tagged for months and years, and dating these tags with old dates give a false impression that they have been tagged for that entire period. I hope I've been clear, but please let me know if you have questions or would like to discuss further. Best regards. Jogurney (talk) 19:16, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
April 2010
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I've noticed that you have been adding your signature to some of your article contributions, such as the edit you made to José Salamanca. This is a simple mistake to make and is easy to correct. For future reference, the need to associate edits with users is taken care of by an article's edit history. Therefore, you should use your signature only when contributing to talk pages, the Village Pump, or other such discussion pages. For a better understanding of what distinguishes articles from these type of pages, please see What is an article?. Again, thank you for contributing, and enjoy your Wikipedia experience! Thank you. tedder (talk) 02:31, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
Akeem Ayayi-Taiwo
I suspect that I'm misunderstanding something, but I've declined the prod at Akeem Ayayi-Taiwo because the article says that he's gotten professional caps. Since it doesn't seem possible to me that someone could earn professional caps without being a professional, I don't think that the article should be deleted without discussion; please feel free to AFD the article if you think that it should be deleted. Nyttend (talk) 01:01, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
As someone who edits a lot on Wikiproject Football - can I have your views on this one? [1] Thanks Steve-Ho (talk) 09:33, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
Template policy discussion
You are invited to help consider a common template policy for all WP:SPORTS biography articles at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Sports#Template_policy_discussion.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 22:56, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
Kudos!
![]() |
The Working Man's Barnstar |
Just a quick little "thank you" for all your hard work assessing the quality of football articles. Your effort hasn't gone un-noticed! Cheers, GiantSnowman 07:01, 11 May 2010 (UTC) |
"Strange text" at Gordon Brown
Aye, I agree it's strange! alt text is provided for blind and visually impaired users; it tends to be very different to the usual text that other readers would see - while I can see that a photo might be of "a man" and all I need by way of a caption is to be told that the man is "Gordon Brown", visually impaired users need more detail.
...which is a long-winded way of saying: I reverted you, I'm sorry!
Cheers, TFOWRThis flag once was red 15:04, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
Doubtful Finnish Football Club Entries
In my Wikipedia work on Finnish Football Clubs I have come across the following 3 entries that give rise to concern:
Aseman Pallo: Whilst they are a Finnish football club they are not part of the Finnish Football League system.
Laakson Palloseura: I can find no evidence of a team with this name in the Finnish Football League system. It is a clear candidadte as a rogue entry in my opinion.
Lemlands IF: While this is a valid football club on the Åland Islands they participate at a very minor level and are not within the Finnish Football League system. However they could be likened to some of the Isle of Man clubs that we list.
I will leave you to assess whether any of the above entries should be deleted. One bench mark may be that none of the above clubs are listed among the 237 clubs within the Finnish Wikipedia Football Club Index - Suomalaiset_jalkapalloseurat
Many thanks for all your hard work on the WikiProject Football. It is much appreciated.
Finnish Gas (talk) 14:01, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
Laakson Palloseura Article
I make the following comments on the Laakson Palloseura article which has previously been proposed for deletion (refer User_talk:90.198.32.58):
1. There is no evidence that there is a club named Laakson Palloseura that is an affiliated club with the with the Helsingin piiri (Helsinki District) of the Suomen PalloLiitto (Finnish FA) and playing at a “notable level” within the 8 tiers of the Finnish_football_league_system.
2. There is no evidence of a stadium called Laakso Stadion with a supposed capacity of 4,000.
3. There is no evidence of Laakson Palloseura competing in the Kolmonen and finishing 4th in the 2008 or 2009 seasons in any of the 3 relevant sections administered by the Helsinki SPL and Uusimaa SPL.
4. There is no evidence of a website for a club named Laakson Palloseura or any Finnish language related material making reference to a club of this name.
5. LPS is the abbreviation for Laajasalon Palloseura which is a Helsinki based club.
It is quite possible that the author has misinterpreted Laakson Palloseura for Laajasalon Palloseura and I suggest that the position be now rectified by re-directing Laakson Palloseura to the Laajasalon Palloseura page.
Alternatively if there is proven evidence of a club called Laakson Palloseura which meets the “notability” criteria, I would be delighted to assist in developing the article from its current stub status. Finnish Gas (talk) 20:05, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
Reviewer granted
![](http://up.wiki.x.io/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/c7/Redaktor_Wikipedia_600px.png/130px-Redaktor_Wikipedia_600px.png)
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.
When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. The Rambling Man (talk) 17:32, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
DYK for Motherwell v Hibernian (5 May 2010)
![]() | On June 16, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Motherwell v Hibernian (5 May 2010), which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
— Rlevse • Talk • 12:03, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
Back in December, you added the {{Notability}} template to this article. I agree that it's non-notable, and have nominated it for deletion. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soccerpulse (2nd nomination). Robofish (talk) 15:45, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
Apologies
Hi there, JMORRISON, VASCO from Portugal here,
I apologize for repeatedly removing the "CD San Fernando players" category from Luna (footballer)'s page, won't happen again.
Now, i'll present my defense: I don't know if you are aware of this discussion (please see here http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Football#User:Zombie433) about User:Zombie433, he does not want to interact with people, he has no English skills. When people try to approach him and help him with his Modus Operandi, what does he do? Removes messages, without a word of reply!
Speaking about the specific subject of categories: he over-categorizes, creating cats for ALL the clubs in the world, first to fifth division, whether players have only appeared there as youths or not. I mean, i agree that all the clubs in the world, from Real Madrid to AS Vita Club, deserve the same respect, but it is too much in my opinion - that, coupled with the fact he does not talk to anyone, unless it is a German user writing in German, set me up to undo all his contributions.
That said, in LUNA's particular case, sorry again for any mishap, won't revert the category again. Cheers, keep up the good work - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 19:36, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
Chetak Football Club
Hi. This is Rohit from India and a Chetak football club member. I guess you added the {{Notability}} template to this article i.e you have termed the article on Chetak FC as non-notable. Please let me know what I have to do how to make the article 'notable'. I have been trough some of the articles on Wikipedia regarding this. But I coudn't find any excat solution to it. Your comments are welcome talk 8 July 2010 —Preceding undated comment added 05:31, 8 July 2010 (UTC).
National Soccer League
You recently assessed National Soccer League. Could you let me know what it is that needs improving? Thanks. Blackmissionary (talk) 23:46, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi
Thanks for your edits. Especially at Bryan Gunn. If I might be pernickety, please could you use more explanatory edit summaries when making big changes, like at Gunn. That's not a reformat, it's a major overhaul of the template. Cheers. --Dweller (talk) 13:19, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
Assessment
Hello, and thanks for assessing Johnny McNichol. Was wondering if you could find the time to tell me what it needs to make the difference between C and B? trying to get it straight in my own mind more than anything. Was thinking of possibly taking it on to good article, if I can find a decent Crystal Palace-related source, I know that section's a bit skimpy. thanks, Struway2 (talk) 09:32, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
Also, thanks for assessing the East Northumberland League. If you can suggest any more sources of information, let me know, but I suspect that any more information would be original research. :/ - Wmcduff (talk) 12:57, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
A merge proposal has been put forward here. Thanks. —Half Price 11:43, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
Ashington A.F.C. Assessment
Thanks for assessing this (and East Northumberland League as well). Out of curiousity, what do you think needs to be worked on for B-Class? I'm guessing it's a Supporters section and more pictures, but is there anything else that you would recommend? - Wmcduff (talk) 22:23, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
Hello
Hi Jmorrison230582, hope you're well. As an editor who has used the services of the Guild of Copy Editors, I thought you might be interested in knowing that the Guild is currently holding elections for its coordinators. To view the discussion and voice your opinion, please visit the election page. Thanks! – SMasters (talk) 15:32, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
2010-11 Scottish Premier League
Hi. I was wondering what your reasoning was for deleting the "Positions by Round" table on the SPL page for this season? I put a wee bit of time into it, because I saw similar tables on a few of the other leagues this season and thought it was a useful addition. I don't edit pages that regularly, so maybe it didn't follow one of the rules for editing or something, but it seemed useful and interesting to me. Cheers, Craig.
Craig1989 (talk) 21:28, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
Merry Christmas!
![]() | Wishing you all the very best for the season. Thanks for all your help and support this year. Merry Christmas and may Santa be good to you! – SMasters (talk) 03:54, 24 December 2010 (UTC) Click to play! | ![]() |
Daniele Giordano
Hi jmorrison im not against your proposed deletion of this page because it doesn't meet the current standards, but do you agree with the current requirements in WikiProject Football. Adam4267 (talk) 20:57, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
Richie Towell
Ok, sorry about the 3rr just got over-excited. His Celtic debut was his professional debut, he may go on to make 20 debuts in his career that dosn't mean we should have info about all of them, I showed you two examples from more notable players so it's not just my opinion. Thanks Adam4267 (talk) 23:07, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
- There is currently a discussion here in which you may have been involved. ----Addihockey10 e-mail 20:24, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
Scott Brown
Hello Jmorrison, I made this edit to Scott Brown that may be contenetious and I wanted your input to see if it was ok. Thanks Adam4267 (talk) 23:35, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
Yeh thanks for that, Wikipedia:Video links says that you can sometimes have links to youtube but I think the one I put up was probably copyrighted. I want to do a bit of work on his page because the Celtic section is quite poor especially if you compare it with the Hibs section which is really good. I wanted to ask what you thought about this US politician having the Scott Brown page, he doesn't seem more notable than the footballer so I think Scott Brown sould be a disambiguation page. Adam4267 (talk) 20:37, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
Yeh I suppose your right, can I ask you help about properly doing sources is their a way to easily package them? Adam4267 (talk) 20:59, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
Yep that hatnote is a pretty good idea, I suppose Broonie's notability is much more fluid although I would think he is probably more notable here. Do you think we could get his page to a GA? Adam4267 (talk) 22:07, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
Thanks, I want to add more to the Celtic section before nominating for Peer review and possibly GA, I think the Celtic section may need to be split up in some way I was thinking Pre-captaincy, Post-Captaincy. Adam4267 (talk) 18:13, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
Yeh ok, i was looking at Nani's article but Henry's is much better. Adam4267 (talk) 18:08, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
Gunny
Hey, nice to see your additions to Bryan Gunn's article! At this rate we'll be heading to FAC in no time. Keep up the great work. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:03, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Albert Watson PROD
Hey there - it's always polite to notify the article creator that you have PRODded an article; luckily I caught this one just in time! GiantSnowman 17:25, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
Hi
Talking about Cfd. Would it be too much for me to ask you to think your edits and nominations through? Anyway consider my compromise at the nomination. Thanks! Pelmeen10 (talk) 18:40, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
Could you tell me why it is that you reverted a user's edits to their own page as vandalism? [2].--Crossmr (talk) 05:39, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
- I have reverted your edits. User cannot vandalise his own userpage (might post inappropriate material on it, but that isn't vandalism), and these edits just appear to be updating the information.
X expatriate footballers in Y CfD
Bloody hell, hadn't quite realised how many of them there were - well done! GiantSnowman 13:46, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
50->27
Hi. No idea on the rights and wrongs of this, but you can't correct Gunn's quote. Best thing is if you have a source showing it was actually number 27, not 50, footnote it. --Dweller (talk) 19:40, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
- Yes. I do wonder about it though - it must have been some kind of milestone. 25th in derbies? 50th league goal? Or maybe Robertson told Gunn a fib!?!? In any case, your footnote's ideal. --Dweller (talk) 09:25, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
SFL 1
Is any player that competes in the Scottish Football League First Division notable? I did hesitate on a few of the players I've PROD'd because the majority of the club's are professional, but it isn't fully-professional is it? Argyle 4 Lifetalk 18:14, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
- So if we go by the letter of the law, then he fails WP:NFOOTBALL because it isn't a fully-professional league. I'm sure there have been seasons when all of the clubs have been professional, but there is no proof of it. Ugh, I wish the criteria was more detailed. Argyle 4 Lifetalk 20:20, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
Invitation to take part in a pilot study
I am a Wikipedian, who is studying the phenomenon on Wikipedia. I need your help to conduct my research on about understanding "Motivation of Wikipedia contributors." I would like to invite you to a short survey. Please give me your valuable time, which estimates only 5 minutes’’’. cooldenny (talk) 17:52, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
Dallas
Thanks for deigning to talk to a vandal you diagnosed after one small edit which included three WP:RSs. Referees give penalties, not linesmen. Witness Dougie McDonald and Steven Craven. 94.14.244.0 (talk) 23:05, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
Manchester City Supporters page
Thanks for assessing the Manchester City F.C. Supporters page last month. I've tried to give citations wherever possible, including on most famous supporters and will continue to do so as they are of paramount importance. Have you got any suggestions on how I can improve the page to Good Article status? Stevo1000 (talk) 01:32, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
- Appreciate the feedback. Will build on it if I can. Regards Stevo1000 (talk) 23:35, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
DYK for 1980 Scottish Cup Final
![]() | On 28 April 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article 1980 Scottish Cup Final, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that a riot after the 1980 Scottish Cup Final between Celtic F.C. and Rangers F.C. resulted in a ban on the sale of alcoholic beverages at sporting events in Scotland? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project (nominate) 12:03, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
2016 page
Great work! Thanks for a fantastic start to this article. --Mais oui! (talk) 04:06, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
Maxwelltown Thistle FC
Hi. You PRODded this, and I deleted it. Undeletion has been requested on my talk page by the club secretary, so per WP:DEL#Proposed deletion I have restored it, and now notify you in case you want to consider taking it to AfD. I have explained to him about notability; I don't know what the likelihood is of a long-standing amateur club like this being able to find enough independent references. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 17:42, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
Edinburgh Meetup - next Monday
A meetup will be held in Edinburgh next Monday, June 20th. Just an informal meet in a pub. With luck we will also have a geo-notice banner in time, although this process seems broken at the moment. Details here; please sign up if you are interested. All welcome. Sorry about the short notice. 20:36, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
Section B
Thanks for adding some details re the above. Even though you are a Hibs supporter, as a Diamond I will take my cap off to you and show my appreciation of the additions!
As the main contributor to Airdrie United Wikipedia page I have been concentrating on this over the last while - I still have quite a bit of information re Section B activities over the years. My main problem has been marrying this up to external references etc.. but I will endeavour to start adding this info. to the Section B article over the coming months.
In the meantime thanks again for your valued contribution.
Centre Stand (talk) 14:25, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
Alex Scott
Great minds think alike, eh? GiantSnowman 12:55, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
GDB assessment
Why England task force? --Juanm (talk) 18:02, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
2011–12 Hibernian F.C. season
Thanks, for correcting the match result when I Initially added the report the heading said, Livingston 2-0 Hibernian Weird, thats how I missed the O'Connor Goal, I have since corrected the Livingston season page. Regards (★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★) 21:47, 5 July 2011 (UTC))
Thanks very much for your work on the references on this article! - Salamurai (talk) 02:12, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
Hibs pictures to be used in Dutch article
I am not sure about the rules about copyright rules when using a picture from one wikipedia page on the page about the same subject but in a different language. For that reason I was wondering if I can use the pictures that are on the English Hibernian FC page for the Dutch article on the club? Or is there some special permission needed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cruon (talk • contribs) 13:26, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
Wondering if you might be able to help. Just created the above player who made his debut today for Hibs. Slight problem is im convinced if used the wrong details. Hibs have his date of birth making him as 1985 making him 26. It then goes on to say he played for the under 19s last year and also soccerbase has his date of birth as 1985. There is another David Crawford who played for ayr united who was born in 1985. Im wondering if they have been confused as i believe hibs david crawford was on loan there. Any advice would be great. Warburton1368 (talk) 15:09, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks hopefully the correct stats will be available soon. Including his Ayr united ones. You would of thought the Hibs official site would of been able to get his details correct. Warburton1368 (talk) 15:52, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
Blackburn Rovers
Of course they play in England! You try editing on a mobile! haha! RoverTheBendInSussex (talk) 21:57, 03 August 2011 (GMT)
Thanks for joining the task force. I was wondering if you would care to give your opinion on the talk page re article assessment. Warburton1368 (talk) 16:14, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
I know you support hibs but i was wondering if you might be able to give me a hand trying to improve the standard of the article i would like to get it up to GA like the Hibernian F.C. article would you be willing to help. Warburton1368 (talk) 18:53, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
Scott Brown
I have listed Scott Brown for GA status and, made some more updates to the article. I found a video of him scoring a goal, in Celtic's pre-season tour of Australia. But I am not sure how to upload it to Wikipedia. Or even if it should be in the page. Adam4267 (talk) 11:18, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
Anthony Stokes
I've asked for opinion here [3] as I would have thought that reliably sourced info on the father is relevant. Let's see what happens. Mattun0211 (talk) 11:33, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
Fair enough. I wasn't so familair with BLP. All the best,Mattun0211 (talk) 02:06, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
Dougie McDonald
I would like to apologise for the rude gestures on the Wikipedia page. In the past 48 hours my Email address and password was compromised and many things I am subscribed to have been changed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Connza (talk • contribs) 11:48, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
John MacLennan Buchanan listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect John MacLennan Buchanan. This proposal will potentially affect the disambiguation of all John Buchanan articles, so you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). MTS Peanut (talk) 07:29, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
What do you think about this?
HM Advocate v Muirhead and McKenzie Is this article appropriate? I was going to list for deletion but I am not sure because it is a court case and I do not know what the rules are relating to them. Thanks. Adam4267 (talk) 21:46, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
Garry O'Connor
I saw you removed the drugs story earlier and did not necessarily agree but let it stand. However I have just removed a longer and more sketchily-sourced version. It is something we will need to address in article talk I think. Could you chip in there? --John (talk) 08:10, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
FC Steaua București in Europe
this page was created by me. the informations from "Steaua București in Europe" was stolen from me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.25.215.90 (talk) 17:34, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
silly kid. this is a lie — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.25.215.90 (talk) 17:37, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
Hello. I stayed a few weeks I wrote and gather this information, and you now want do not delete my work — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.25.215.90 (talk) 17:43, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
then move from all football teams statistics from europe and move to a separate page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.25.215.90 (talk) 17:48, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
Would you mind if i add your recent articles that fall within the task force to the above page or would you be willing to do it. Just so we can keep track as how well we are doing as a group. Warburton1368 (talk) 22:03, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
![](http://up.wiki.x.io/wikipedia/en/thumb/7/74/Ambox_warning_yellow.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_yellow.svg.png)
The article Matt Gray has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 20:32, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
Books
i have decided to give the Hearts page a complete rewrite as its badly sourced and inaccurate in places. Started it at User:Edinburgh Wanderer/Hearts New Layout but will take a whilst. Just wondering if you know of any good books regarding football in Edinburgh that i could use as sources. Edinburgh Wanderer 15:40, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
![]() |
The Good Article Barnstar | |
Thanks Jmorrison230582 for helping to promote Scott Brown (Scottish footballer) to Good Article status. Please accept this little sign of appreciation and goodwill from me, because you deserve it. Keep it up, and give someone a pat on the back today. Sp33dyphil "Ad astra" 22:21, 9 October 2011 (UTC) |
WikiProject Wikify invitation
![]() | Hi there! I thought you might be interested in WikiProject Wikify. We're currently recruiting help to clear a massive backlog (20,670 articles), and we need your help! If you have a spare moment, please join and wikify an article or tell your friends. Sp33dyphil © • © 08:15, 11 October 2011 (UTC) |
List of Livingston F.C. managers
When i created the article i was aware that entering europe was not technically an honour however given its only happened once it is certainly a notable moment. Given that Leishman is down as first manager. Thats not an honour but a notable moment shall we say. I propose we changing title to notable achievements or moments. I would appreciate a reply here or on my talk page. Edinburgh Wanderer 21:50, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
- If you have only qualified once then to me thats an achievement. If you qualified a lot or to me even a few times then i agree mentioning it isnt correct but if its the first and only time then why not. Livingston actually list it as an honour on their site which if they did all the time i would disagree with. Thats why i suggested changing main title from honours or maybe adding another column for notes. Edinburgh Wanderer 22:10, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
GA Reviews
I think between us we have done everything the reviewer asked. Great job on finding the stuff about his early career BTW. I will try and improve Hooper's page over the next few days. Thanks for reviewing those articles, I thought I would have to wait months like for Brown for someone to review them. Although it is kind of hard to do more than one page at a time. So I would appreciate it if you would give me into next week to finish off Hoooper's article. Adam4267 (talk) 22:04, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
- Hi could you please contiue the review at Gary Hooper, I think I have done everything you asked but any more points you would like addresed I will try and finish off this morning. Thanks. Adam4267 (talk) 10:12, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
- Hi could you please finish Gary Hooper's review. If you do not want to can you please say and I will ask someone else to do it. Adam4267 (talk) 14:23, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for finishing the GA review. Adam4267 (talk) 09:30, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
assessment
I see you assessing some articles such as Sebastián Martínez. FYI, there hasn't been just a "priority" parameter in the WikiProject Biography banner for a few years. Please use sports-priority, musician-priority, politician-priority, etc. Bgwhite (talk) 22:31, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
![]() |
The Good Article Barnstar | |
Thanks Jmorrison230582 for helping to promote Hampden Park to Good Article status. Please accept this little sign of appreciation and goodwill from me, because you deserve it. Keep it up, and give some a pat on the back today. --Sp33dyphil © • © 23:58, 11 November 2011 (UTC) |
Hampden
![]() |
The Special Barnstar | |
For your extreme effort in improving Hampden Park to GA status. Monkeymanman (talk) 00:29, 15 November 2011 (UTC) |
Ibrox.jpg
Hi I removed your proposed deletion from File:Ibrox.jpg under F6. I don't see any claim on the file that it is non-free content and therefore is requiring a rational. Indeed the uploader claims ownership and has released it to the public domain. As to [image on the Rangers website]. It's not the same image. Obviously they are similar, as you'd expect, they're plans of the same stadium. But I see no evidence that one is a copy of the other. They are different dimensions and have different details. --Escape Orbit (Talk) 00:05, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
Scotland Assessment
Thanks for improving the assessment part of the task force change. However on the discussion page the consensus was that Scotland Internationalist were classed as High, under 21's mid and SPL players at mid as well. Reading between the lines that dosent appear to be the case with your changes. If thats the case then we need to take back to a discussion to make sure we are tagging at the same assessment level. If I'm wrong then we need to make the page a bit clearer. Edinburgh Wanderer 00:00, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
GA Barnstar
![]() |
The Good Article Barnstar | |
Well done on getting Easter Road to Good Article status. Keep going with your brilliant work on Scottish football stadium articles, and WikiProject:Football in general. Adam4267 (talk) 00:42, 3 December 2011 (UTC) |