User talk:JimmenyCricketttt

July 2022

Hello, I'm Padgriffin. I noticed that you recently removed content from Anonymous and the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Padgriffin ^{Griffin's Nest} 16:50, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Is this an autobot? I just removed something to edit it really quick and then put it back right away. This page is made by my friend so I know what i'm doing thanks JimmenyCricketttt (talk) 16:54, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello JimmenyCricketttt! Your additions to Anonymous and the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 16:15, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This makes no sense because the everything I had added was in our own words. This is a first person source. You don't know what you're talking about. JimmenyCricketttt (talk) 18:35, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I found text that matched several websaites, including https://ddosecrets.substack.com/p/release-transneft-79-gb, https://securityaffairs.co/wordpress/130262/hacktivism/anonymous-targets-russian-entities.html, and https://cybersocialhub.com/csh/since-declaring-cyber-war-on-russia-anonymous-leaked-5-8-tb-of-russian-data/. — Diannaa (talk) 20:44, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Did you even read what we said on your talk page? Of course the websites use the same text because it's literally only a one sentence description to explain the dump and each one is the same. Company A hacked by Anonymous actor B and leaked C amount of emails. Company A is related to Company X, Y, Z. There's only so much to say. Similar phrasing isn't copyright especially when those same websites and writers not only wrote it after we did, but also HELPED us write the articles. You're a goofball. JimmenyCricketttt (talk) 21:50, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on AlphaBay. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Waxworker (talk) 08:46, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I get it bro you sit on Wikipedia all day long reverting edits, you're a badass JimmenyCricketttt (talk) 08:47, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for making personal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 09:13, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]