User talk:Jemthepen

Notes

Sign your name on talk pages using four tildes, this will automatically produce your name and the date. Example (Jemthepen 15:47, 7 June 2006 (UTC));[reply]

If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, or place "{ {tl|helpme} }" on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

License tagging for Image:Dolega Manor.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Dolega Manor.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 14:06, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

Help Me

1). Can anyone translate this:-

Henryk Dobrzański Wiadomo, że Henryk Dobrzański poległ pod Anielinem na "skutek zdrady", jak napisano w komunikacie podpisanym przez jego zastępcę porucznika Marka Szymańskiego pseudonim "Sęp" i adiutanta Henryka Ossowskiego pseudonim "Dołęga". Pochowano go w tajemnicy; wbrew utrzymującej się długo pogłosce - nie miał pogrzebu z honorami. Miejsce jego spoczynku, mimo intensywnych poszukiwań, nadal jest nieznane.

Sorry I don't speak Polish? Hence what's the connection with Dołęga-Ossowski and who is Henryk Dołęga-Ossowski?

Thanks

Hello. Henryk Ossowski (pseudonym Dołęga) was aide-de-camp of Major Henryk Dobrzański, according to that [1] fragment. That's all i know, sorry.

Further info:-

Henryk Dołęga-Ossowski was a Court officer, who was an army General. He served as a personal aide to mjr Henryk Dobrzański. Brother of Sebastian, grandfather's brother.

2). Different country's Wikipedia

How do you leave a message on a different country's Wikipedia (Polish in my case) using the four tildas. Or do you have to create another account on their Wikipedia to do so? What if you don't speak Polish?

Yep, you'll have to sign up on that wiki. Generally if you don't understand the language, you won't need to have an account on the wiki ;) -- 9 cds^(talk) 16:31, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

3). Adding picture

Sorry it's not exactly clear! If it's my own picture what exactly do I need t do? (Jemthepen 15:39, 7 June 2006 (UTC))[reply]

You just need to pick a licence from Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page.

For example if you chose {{cc-by-sa-2.5}}, edit the image page and replace {{untagged|month=June|day=7|year=2006}} with {{cc-by-sa-2.5}}.--Commander Keane 19:07, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Problem? http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Image:St_Jadwigi_Church_1.jpg

4). Visitor Map {{helpme}} Jemthepen 23:10, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can you use this code on your user page? If you can, how do you get it to work?

Please leave Messages here:-

Inaccuracies in the article "Count Jan Dołęga-Ossowski

Inaccuracies in the article "Count Jan Dołęga-Ossowski":

1- When did he was born? When did he died? Who was he? What did he do?

2- Indeed, Dołęga-Ossowski was/is an aristocratic Polish family.

3- Nevertheless, there are several DIFFERENT Ossowski aristocratic families: Coat of arms Abdank – Dolega – Gryf - Prus I – Rola – Ulina. (See Ossowski).

4- None of the Ossowski of any Coat of arms bore the Nobility title of Count (pl. Hrabia). May be documents refereeing to the Courtesy title of "Count", (pl. Komes or Comes). This is a totally different thing.

5- Sometimes members of a same family began to use a different surname as the Buczacki and Jazlowiecki (Coat of arms of Abdank), for example, but NEVER changed the Coat of arms. A variation of a Coat of arms is not a CHANGING of Coat of arms.

6- Archbishop Janisław was from the Coat of arms of Sulima. Anyway, a Janisław of Ossowy from the Gryf coat of arms is NOT the same Janisław of Ossowy from the Rola or Dołęga coat of arms.

7- Misliborz of Dobrzyn may be the first historical accurate user of the Coat of arms of Dołęga, not Jan of Ossowy.

8- SOURCES:

--Gustavo Szwedowski de Korwin 08:23, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please, see also:

Janisław I and Ossowski

I am just trying to fix your article. Best regards.

--Gustavo Szwedowski de Korwin 08:29, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, That's OK Gustavo!

It hasn't all been written by me!

But I've been told/passed down the generations that there was a Archbishop Ossowski in the family, I always assumed it was him. I thought I read/seen it in a old Polish surname history book that his name was Ossowski? Jemthepen 23:03, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[IMG]http://i27.photobucket.com/albums/c194/jemthepen/OssowskiFamily1.jpg[/IMG]

Jemthepen 00:30, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Dołęga-Ossowski

Dear Jemthepen:

I am very sorry to write you just now. I was very busy those days. It seems you are quite new in Wikipedia. So welcome and greetigngs!

First let me teach you something. When you want to contact me you must edit your message in MY talk page, not in YOURS. If you write in your own talk page I will not have notice that you are tying to contact me, my friend.

It is easy, just enter in my signature and do it. Then I will receive a notice saying somebody is trying to contact me. - Just edit in the page "Discussion" (in MY page) where there is a (+) put a little title and then edit your message in the place you will find there. Finally, sing with the "signature" button (4 tildes will appear then). That is all. -

About the page book you e-mailed me, I believe it is very interesting. I already sent it to the editor of the Polish page about archbishop Janisław. I would like to know the name of the book and the name of its author also. That could be a "source". May be he did a mistake in his article. We will see...

Anyway, if you are a Ossowski herbu Dolęga be sure that your ancestor achbishop was from Herb Dolęga also, not Gryf. He was another archbishop.

I could not found none count/hrabia from surname Ossowski. Perhaps he was a count/komes. "Hrabia" is a Hereditary title (a nobility title properly). "Komes" or also Comes was a military high official in times of the Piast dynasty. Later the title fell into disuse. Sometimes it can appear again in letters from kings to some noblemen, nevertheless, just as courtesy title, as so as "Baro" (baron).

I believe is a very good thing to be proud of his own family background. But remember the Jan Zamojsky motto "there is not nothing higher than to be a Polish Nobleman". Your family was a powerful one. You do not need to claim other tithe than Szlachcic.

Well this was a long message... I will be proud to know more about your family. If you allow me, the name of the article could be better as "Dolęga–Ossowski family", and,of course, re-write the article carefully.

I would like to know more about yourself. Are you an Englishman (or Englishwoman) from Polish family or are you a Pole who is living in England right now? You are free to tell me this, if you wish, of course. Please, be kind with my English, it is just a middle level one.

So we will be in touch my dear friend. Best regards. --Gustavo Szwedowski de Korwin 07:49, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Inaccuracies in the article "Count Jan Dołęga-Ossowski

Inaccuracies in the article "Count Jan Dołęga-Ossowski":

1- When did he was born? When did he died? Who was he? What did he do?

2- Indeed, Dołęga-Ossowski was/is an aristocratic Polish family.

3- Nevertheless, there are several DIFFERENT Ossowski aristocratic families: Coat of arms Abdank – Dolega – Gryf - Prus I – Rola – Ulina. (See Ossowski).

4- None of the Ossowski of any Coat of arms bore the Nobility title of Count (pl. Hrabia). May be documents refereeing to the Courtesy title of "Count", (pl. Komes or Comes). This is a totally different thing.

5- Sometimes members of a same family began to use a different surname as the Buczacki and Jazlowiecki (Coat of arms of Abdank), for example, but NEVER changed the Coat of arms. A variation of a Coat of arms is not a CHANGING of Coat of arms.

6- Archbishop Janisław was from the Coat of arms of Sulima. Anyway, a Janisław of Ossowy from the Gryf coat of arms is NOT the same Janisław of Ossowy from the Rola or Dołęga coat of arms.

7- Misliborz of Dobrzyn may be the first historical accurate user of the Coat of arms of Dołęga, not Jan of Ossowy.

8- SOURCES:

--Gustavo Szwedowski de Korwin 07:22, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copy: "New name for a changed article"

Dear Jeremy:

I re- wrote the article “Count Jan…” and change its name to Dołęga-Ossowski It is far from a good work, even so I believe it is a little better. Please, check the English and be free to do the changes that you can wish.

Best regards. --Gustavo Szwedowski de Korwin 23:49, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

About Janisław (arcybiskup)

Dear Jeremy:

I re-send your source about archbishop Janislaw to Maciej Rog and to the author of the article: Maciej Szczepanczyk without any answer.

Nevertheless, they must be done some research, since the Coat of arms of the archbishop changed from Sulima to Korab. There is a new source, on a book illumination before 1535.

I believe You can write to them better than me. Both of them can read and write in English too, even usually do it in Polish.

How is your new article "Dolega Ossowski" going on?

Best regards.

--Gustavo Szwedowski de Korwin 06:45, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New name for a changed article

Dear Jeremy:

I re- wrote the article “Count Jan…” and change its name to Dołęga-Ossowski It is far from a good work, even so I believe it is a little better. Please, check the English and be free to do the changes that you can wish.

Best regards. --Gustavo Szwedowski de Korwin 23:47, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Osowa Sień

read this:-

Osowa Sień tzw. Środkowa - Dwór Dwór w Osowej Sieni, położony jest w południowo-zachodniej części wsi, w majątku dawniej określanym jako środkowy (Mittel Röhrsdorf). Koło budynku dworu w kierunku wschodnim, znajduje się gotycki kościół pw. św. Fabiana i Sebastiana. Założenie dworsko folwarczne ma czytelną kompozycję z wyraźnym podziałem na wschodnią część rezydencjonalną i zachodnią gospodarczą. Na osi głównej zespołu znajduje się dwór, a po jego wschodniej stronie prostopadle usytuowane są trzy oficyny. Część rezydencjonalną od strony zachodniej zamyka budynek wozowni, za którym rozpoczyna się założenie folwarczne z budynkami gospodarczymi, oborą, stodołami, czworakiem, skupionymi wokół prostokątnego dziedzińca. Na północ od dworu i podwórza gospodarczego rozciąga się park krajobrazowy, sięgający aż do drogi prowadzącej do założenia pałacowo-parkowego w Osowej Sieni Górnej. Nowy właściciel adaptuje budynek dworu oraz dwóch oficyn na cele agroturystyczne. Trzecia oficyna dworska jest odrębną własnością prywatną i pełni funkcję mieszkalną.

Nazwa wsi wzmiankowanej w 1325 roku brzmiała „Ruiegeri willa”, a w roku 1404 „Rodger willa”. Osowa Sień jest gniazdem rodziny Ossowskich herbu Dołęga. Historycznie istniał podział na trzy folwarki: Górny, Środkowy i Dolny. W 1793 roku, w spadku po Andrzeju Żychlińskim, folwark środkowy odziedziczył najstarszy syn z pierwszego małżeństwa, Franciszek Henryk (1700-1764). W 1799 roku, gdy majątek został wystawiony na licytację, kupił go Aleksander Potworowski, aby następnie sprzedać Adamowi Konstantemu Mielęckiemu (1740-1810) z Jędrzychowic. Po jego śmierci folwark środkowy przejął jego syn Konstanty Adam (1773-1826), który wybudował tam rezydencję i grobowiec. W 1845 roku zlicytowano Osową Sień Średnią, którą nabył Joann Georg Quos. Rodzina von Hoven weszła w posiadanie średniego folwarku w wyniku korzystnego mariażu Hermana von Hoven z Pauliną Quos w roku 1847. W 1922 roku dwór i folwark zmodernizował Hans Joachim von Hoven. Rodzina von Hoven posiadała folwark średni do czasów II wojny światowej.

http://www.glogow.pl/okolice/podstrony/wschowski/osowasien.htm

http://www.lwkz.pl/monument/show/id/530/letter/O/location/180

Metropolitan Police Service

Hello there. As I say in my edit summary, your edit gives a lot of undue weight to a single prosecution, and the vague "it makes you think" opinion of a single "court employee" (which the tabloid actually only refers to as "a source", which could mean anything) isn't of any encyclopaedic interest in an article about the entire Met.

More seriously, "the Met employes the highest number of convicted Police Officers" is a serious allegation, and does not appear to be backed up by your source.

Corruption and conviction is definitely worth writing about here, but we should draw from better sources, pick only the highest-profile examples, and find stronger criticism (which surely exists!) than the meaningless "a source said it makes you think". --McGeddon (talk) 19:39, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit is being discussed here if you want to contribute. --McGeddon (talk) 12:41, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Convictions within the Metropolitan Police

The London Metropolitan force tops the list for the largest number of officers arrested - 304 - with 17 quizzed over sex offences as well as 123 for violence. [2] In December 2007 the Crown Prosecutors at Westminster magistrates court decided that an assault case against a Police Officer to be dropped after it emerged that the victim another officer had herself been arrested a year earlier and received two cautions for common assault. [3]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 17:45, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free files in your user space

Hey there Jemthepen, thank you for your contributions. I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:Jemthepen. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to your user-space drafts or your talk page.

See a log of files removed today here.

Shut off the bot here.

Report errors here.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 05:01, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 01:13, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Day To Remember, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Cole (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:47, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 16:19, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dołęga

Witam! Jak widzę, ma Pan polskie korzenie i mam nadzieję, że mówi Pan po polsku. Mój angielski jest marny, i wolę odpowiedzieć na Pańskie pytanie po polsku. Usunęłem ilustrację Image:Dolega 1.jpg dlatego, że jest w niej dużo błedów. Sam obrazek jest na dobitkę niezbyt ładny, moim zdaniem, a jest przecież na Wikipedii tyle pięknych, starych i nowych wizerunków tego herbu. Błędnie opisane są elementy herbu, pomieszane są nazwy polskie z angielskimi, przy czym angielskie po części nie są właściwymi heraldyce angielskiej określeniami, a dowolnymi tłumaczeniami z polskiego na angielski.

pl:klejnot herbowy to po angielsku crest a nie jevel
pl:labry to po angielsku mantling
kolory heraldyczne (tynktury) to po angielsky tincture
godło heraldyczne to po angielsku nie Figure or Emblem a Common charges
na wstędze gdzie zgodnie z opisem ma być motto jest umieszczona nazwa herbu. Jeśli przyjąć, że nazwa herbu jest również zawołaniem herbowym, to powinna być umieszczona nad herbem, odpowiadające w heraldyce angielskiej to slogan lub battle cry. Ponadto błędna była informacja, że wstęga z dewizą herbową była elementem średniowiecznego herbu. To raczej późniejszy dodatek.

Usunęłem ponadto informacje o tytułach szlacheckich, jako niezwiązane z tematem hasła, a ponadto niedokładne.

pozdrawiam Steifer (talk) 13:47, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Zaleski family (Dołęga coat of arms) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zaleski family (Dołęga coat of arms) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zaleski family (Dołęga coat of arms) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:37, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Bishop Alberta Ossowski.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:35, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bishop Alberta Ossowski.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

File:Bishop Alberta Ossowski.jpg

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 04:28, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:St Jadwigi Church 1.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:St Jadwigi Church 1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 23:28, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]