User talk:Jasonagastrich

Makawao Forest Reserve

Thank you for cleaning that up. --Anthonyhcole (talk · contribs · email) 13:48, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You’re welcome. Thanks for your encouragement. It’s good to be back. Jasonagastrich (talk) 19:52, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hawaii Community Correctional Center moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Hawaii Community Correctional Center, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PATH SLOPU 04:15, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. I have followed your instructions and added sources and references and more content. I have submitted it for review, but it says it could take 8 weeks and there are over 4,000 pages waiting to be reviewed. Could you review it or expedite it? That is a long time. Thanks. Jasonagastrich (talk) 05:03, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hawaii Community Correctional Center has been accepted

Hawaii Community Correctional Center, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bkissin (talk) 13:20, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I was happy to improve the article and I appreciate its acceptance. Have a good day. Jasonagastrich (talk) 22:52, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Article moved to draftspace

Hi Jason. I recently moved an article you created into the draftspace at Draft:Down to Earth Organic & Natural. I conducted this move as the draft currently cites only WP:PRIMARY sources and as such seems to fall short of WP:NCORP criteria. Now that the article is in the draftspace, you can freely edit and improve it without interruption. Please feel free to ask any questions on returning the article to the mainspace. SamHolt6 (talk) 00:21, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Grocery stores in Hawaii

A tag has been placed on Category:Grocery stores in Hawaii requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:37, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Down to Earth Organic & Natural for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Down to Earth Organic & Natural is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Down to Earth Organic & Natural until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 16:06, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. In particular, stop your insinuations that another editor was in an impaired state just because they made an edit that you disagreed with. HaeB (talk) 00:07, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I was joking with another editor. I think he got the joke. I guess you didn’t.

Amigao looked to me like he came to the Global Times article to revert what I contributed and tried to mask it by making other simple edits before and after he reverted my contribution. He also wrote, “removed very poorly worded phrase with a self-referential source” and removed two paragraphs. Did you see that? I imagine you did because you had another lame reason for removing the same two paragraphs before he did.

You cited your removal of my two paragraphs as my “opinion”. That clearly isn’t true. What makes you think you can get away with lying? If you read the Global Times article that I cited you will see that it accurately described what the GT editors said and did. I do not want my opinion in any Wikipedia article. Why didn’t you try to improve it?

Why did you delete the paragraph about the U.S. blocking access to .cn websites? That obviously wasn’t my opinion. That is a verifiable fact. It is relevant because they are blocking access to Global Times.

Don’t you think you should recuse yourself? Since you obviously have an opinion about the inclusion of my two paragraphs you probably should not be reprimanding me. Nobody else did. Do you and Amigao do a lot of the same things?

Jasonagastrich (talk) 12:37, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tasha Cerda for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tasha Cerda is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tasha Cerda until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 00:03, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This was foolish. The inmates are running the asylum. Jasonagastrich (talk) 22:38, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Polly Boiko moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Polly Boiko, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:23, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not a chance. If you want it a better article, then make it a better article. I am only one editor. You can do it. Anyone can do it. Here is an idea. Spend an hour making the article better, then come and talk to me. Jasonagastrich (talk) 22:36, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Polly Boiko

Hello, Jasonagastrich. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Polly Boiko, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:03, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Polly Boiko

Hello, Jasonagastrich. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Polly Boiko".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:38, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Kyphosus hawaiiensis.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Kyphosus hawaiiensis.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Dylsss^{(talk contribs)} 22:23, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jason

Hello Jason. Last time you came back, I tried to speak on your behalf. In retaliation you revealed my real name and home address. That caused meta to create a two new rules, the first being that if you are banned on one wiki project you are banned on all, and the second that anyone who deliberately doxes a fellow editor is permabanned.

Now you are back. What am I to make of this? Jason Harvestdancer | Talk to me 01:26, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t recall doing this. Do you have a link? Jasonagastrich (talk) 01:45, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I do. [1] Jason Harvestdancer | Talk to me 03:03, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also, your edit summary of your response to me, calling me a "deceiver", shows you falling back into your old abusive habits very quickly, the very same abusive habits that contributed to your permanent ban in the first place. Jason Harvestdancer | Talk to me 03:16, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from Wikipedia for ban evasion. You can appeal this block by adding {{unblock|your reason here}} to this page, which you remain able to edit. Stifle (talk) 08:32, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WTF. I returned to Wikipedia a few years ago after rectifying the nonsense that happened when I identified as a fundamentalist Christian per my indoctrination. Your action is puzzling and confusing and I am tempted to care what people think that don’t matter.

Deleting the Makawao Forest Reserve article shows you love ignorance, so I won’t impress you. However, I created the article because I visited the site looking for my neighbor Amanda Eller. Subsequently the media covered it and people joined to find her, so my mission was accomplished. On the bright side your love for ignorance may keep it cleaner. Jasonagastrich (talk) 01:50, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request

{{unblock|this matter has already been adjudicated}} Jasonagastrich (talk) 01:45, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Miscarriage of Justice

I just became aware that I was permanently banned on Wikipedia. However, this is like double jeopardy because I already returned to the community several years ago. I wrote an apology letter a decade ago and was welcomed back into the fold on Wikipedia. It wasn’t a sockpuppet account. I signed my real name. See here[2] Jasonagastrich (talk) 01:56, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You were blocked indefinitely in 2006. Your third appeal in 2007 was tentatively approved, but didn't last long. Your final appeal was denied in 2007. When you wrote that "apology" in 2011 using a sock puppet, Fred Bauder's response in 2012 was not as an admin. He had stepped down from that position some years earlier. It was him as an individual not representing Wikipedia. You knew your ban was a permanent ban at the time it was issued. That it took time for people to notice your newest account does not mean that the ban had been lifted. Jason Harvestdancer | Talk to me 02:14, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]