User talk:JasonPhelps

JasonPhelps, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi JasonPhelps! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Soni (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

January 2017

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Harold Fairweather, from its old location at User:JasonPhelps/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. KGirlTrucker81^{huh? what I've been doing} 21:09, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Harold Fairweather (January 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

These subjects are rarely notable because they're simply known for that 1 event and in the common cases, the only attention is for the then-current "oldest" which is always continually changing.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Harold Fairweather and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 22:41, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Longevity

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Longevity, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Draft:Harold Fairweather concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Harold Fairweather, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Harold Fairweather

Hello, JasonPhelps. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Harold Fairweather".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 22:01, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I don't have any further desire in trying to get this particular Harold Fairweather page onto wikipedia, so it is totally fine if it is deleted. Thanks JasonPhelps (talk) 04:04, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Clarence Matthews

How did you add someone to List of oldest living people who died in July of last year with tons of articles about his death? Were you just vandalizing?--Dorglorg (talk) 00:46, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry! I didn't realize Clarence Matthews had died. No, I was not vandalizing. I just saw some articles that were within the past year of him living and thought he was still alive. Now I know. JasonPhelps (talk) 02:48, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at LDS Conference Center. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. power~enwiki (π, ν) 04:06, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, can I ask why these edits were seen as unconstructive? My intent was to help this page by having it use the true name of the church. The Prophet of the church on Sunday at the church's General Conference asked everyone to use the true name of the church instead of acronyms like "LDS" or "Mormon". So, why am I getting this message saying my edits were unconstructive? JasonPhelps (talk) 19:31, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Several image links were broken: note the revision after your changes has several red links where images were. Separately, Wikipedia does not automatically follow style pronunciations like this. power~enwiki (π, ν) 23:24, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Okay thank you! I will be more careful in the future not to make edits that break image links. I notice that this topic has also been brought up on some of the talk pages now, so I'll try voicing there with regards to how acronyms for the church are used versus the true name of the church JasonPhelps (talk) 23:28, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]