User talk:Janan2025

January 2025

Hello, I'm Ivebeenhacked. I noticed that you recently removed content from 2025 without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 09:01, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at 2025 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 21:29, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 13:18, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at 2025. For a second final time, please stop your disruptive editing and familiarise yourself with Wikipedia guidelines. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 21:21, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Soetermans,

I don't understand how am I being disruptive. I now understand that I shouldn't have deleted the big chunk on the 2025 page, but I don't know what's wrong with those minor edits (changing numbers from letters to digits). I'm trying my best to improve the text, and I don't think I'm doing anything wrong anymore. Why do you think every edit I make is disruptive? Janan2025 (talk) 21:57, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Because single-digit numbers usually shouldn't be written in digits. See MOS:NUMERAL. There are some exceptions, see MOS:NUMNOTES. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with the Manual of style. Thank you. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 22:27, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that your recent edit to Church (building) did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account, you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary), and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! jlwoodwa (talk) 20:10, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits

Can you explain to me what is going on here? Why are you doing this? What is the point? Sergecross73 msg me 21:02, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Sergecross73,

The reason why I'm doing this is to feel good about the number of my edits going up. I don't have any bad intentions in doing this. This is the only way I can do it, as I can rarely find appropriate parts of articles to edit. I might continue to do this. It's my own user page, so please don't tell me to stop doing it. Please don't get mad at me! Janan2025 (talk) 21:33, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No, you need to stop doing this immediately. Editors are not to be artificially inflating their edit count like that. We are an encyclopedia, not a stress ball. Sergecross73 msg me 22:34, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2025

Do not use past tense on 2025 entries. Thank you. Wjfox2005 (talk) 08:53, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Wjfox2005,

I don't remember using past tense anywhere on the 2025 page. If I did, it was a mistake. Where did I use past tense? And if I did, what's wrong with that? Janan2025 (talk) 09:03, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]