User talk:Jacktime34

Older warnings and/or other comments on this page have been removed, but are still viewable in the page history.

Page blanking

I notice that you simply blank the page, but this is not considered the best practice. As the page history is kept available for future reference, archiving one's own user talk page is optional, but it makes things more easier to find and link. See how to archive a talk page. --Robertiki (talk) 14:09, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Center Park, Texas

Thanks for creating the article Center Park, Texas! I'm having trouble adding references for this. Is it possible you meant Center Point, Kerr County, Texas?--Fabrictramp | talk to me 01:37, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

In the same vein, I'm having trouble finding Fink, Texas in Coleman County. However, there is a small town named Fink in Grayson County. I'm going to change the article. If you can come up with a reference for one in Coleman County, let me know and we can make a disambiguation page for the two towns.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 01:41, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 01:51, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Center Park, Texas

Hello, Jacktime34. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Center Park, Texas, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 19:35, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Center Park, Texas for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Center Park, Texas is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Center Park, Texas until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fabrictramp | talk to me 03:02, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your article

Hello Jack, I just wanted to tell you that the page you were working on has been moved into the draft namespace where you can work on it without worrying about it being tagged for deletion. You can find it here now. Happy editing Sakuura Cartelet ^Talk 02:29, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jacktime34. Just to let you know, an article about the subject you want to write about has been created by another user and is available at 2017 Berkeley riots. I've redirected your draft at Draft:2017 Berkeley clashes there. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask me on my talk page. Mz7 (talk) 02:58, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 02:31, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Jacktime34, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Mz7 (talk) 02:59, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please be more careful

This was not a good edit. --John (talk) 09:54, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

National varieties of English

In a recent edit to the page Villa Park, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to India, use Indian English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, or New Zealand, use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author of the article used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. Sakuura Cartelet ^Talk 15:36, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Palm Sunday church bombings. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. bonadea contributions talk 21:36, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize

Hi Jacktime34, I apologize for what happened yesterday. A guy in my orchestra took my laptop when I was using the restroom and tagged it. I also apologize for the false warnings that followed, including one which called it an attack page. How he knew what attack pages were? I have no clue. I know that he went back and undid the first one and warned you about vandalism, when you went on my talk page. He also undid the notices you put on my talk page. He said that you personal attacked him which was not true, and the page was poorly written, but not vandalism and not a test page. However, to point out, yes I can warn you and have the right to do so. It is also required before you report an user to admins. You have been warned by other people. It's IExistToHelp talk 22:46, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Sun Chips, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. General Ization ^Talk 02:59, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited North Korea–United States relations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Korean. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:14, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of Austria international footballers

The article List of Austria international footballers has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

We already have the categories Category:Austrian footballers and Category:Austrian expatriate footballers. What additional value is this list going to add?

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jake Brockman (talk) 21:31, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

Hello Jacktime34, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Rabbit have been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Rivertorch^FIRE _WATER 02:23, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, 2017 canton texas tornado

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, 2017 canton texas tornado. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – April 2017 North American storm complex. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at April 2017 North American storm complex. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Skamecrazy123 (talk) 19:54, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback notification

Hello, Jacktime34. You have new messages at JohnInDC's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Super Bowl LI

I reverted your changes; they weren't much of an improvement, and the several different places where you had capitalization errors made the edit a net negative. I don't think this edit is worth re-trying. Regards, Tarl N. (discuss) 00:13, 19 May 2017 (UTC) Ok thank you for telling me Thanks Jacktime34 (talk) 00:14, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stewie2k (June 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chrissymad was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Stewie2k and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 21:24, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Shroud (player) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shroud (player) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shroud (player) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 16:21, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Xyp9x

The article Xyp9x has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable e-sportsperson. References available confirm his existence only.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 01:18, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Jacktime34. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

re: barnstar

Even reverts (compare Revision as of 2017-12-24T13:11:54 (edit) to Revision as of 2017-12-24T13:11:55) in less than 2 seconds are possible! Merry Christmas --Avoided (talk) 12:22, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2018 Trump Tower fire

The article 2018 Trump Tower fire has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NOTNEWS, WP:NOTNOTABLE

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WWGB (talk) 02:53, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 22:11, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock please

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jacktime34 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Ok i admit it you got me. i was just trolling because i felt like all the editors were huge dicks to me and did not help and did not care, i copyed vandals and abuser because it was funny please unblock i wont do it again Jacktime34 (talk) 17:36, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. O Still Small Voice of Clam (formerly Optimist on the run) 20:40, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.