User talk:JK the unwise

Archives
Jan 2005 – June 2006

I like those quotes!

I like those quote marks on the February 15 article. Very nice-looking. SchuminWeb (Talk) 23:51, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

why do you comment on which isnt yours?—Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.198.250.14 (talk • contribs) 28 June 2006

?--JK the unwise 16:26, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Suzie

http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Suzie_Wylie_%282nd_nomination%29

Shame to see it go actually :p Hurry up and get famous so i can say i know someone on WP. Bjrobinson 13:58, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

personal attack / "going to hell"

Hi JK the unwise -- The comment made by User:75.43.136.189 and signed by "Elijah" on the CO talk page was a personal attack, and I posted the first NPA warning on that IP address' talk page. Given the substance of the commentary and attacks on "neutrality" I suspect that User:70.253.165.71 and User:75.43.136.189 are the same person. The only non-CO contributions made by the 75.* IP address were made on the 70.* IP address when that person was being banned for disruptive editing. --LQ 19:30, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:3rd ESF london.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:3rd ESF london.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:59, 8 January 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 03:59, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

.

PLease note my response to your comment in Talk: Peace Symbol --Allyn 13:16, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

I have responded to your comment re Wickedness --Allyn 13:16, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Re-rating anti-war articles

I don't know if you've noticed it yet, but I've upgraded our rating system on the anti-war project to the 1.0 standard. As it seems that we're the two biggest contributors to the project, would you like to help convert our existing rating system to the new one? SchuminWeb (Talk) 05:15, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

SW page

Hi Jk Joe / RuaNua here. Thanks for your help on the Socialist Worker (Aotearoa)page. There are still issues with the old SWO page that need rectifying, but we will build this new page first. Please update all relevant links for us if u can so that it re directs here, and the IST should probably know that www.unityaotearoa.blogspot.com is our new web presence on the net!)

Kia kaha RuaNua

Deletion of the Climaction page

Hi JK the hopefully wise

One of my pages was deleted on contested grounds, documenting the Climaction coalition against climate change in New Zealand. www.climaction.org.nz

How do we go about restoring it? There are entries for other eco groups too- Greenpeace, Earth First, Campaign against Cliamte Change. Have I been the victim of Climate Change denial censorship? Who can I appeal the deltion to?

Repled on your talk page--JK the unwise 17:28, 18 April 2007 (UTC) (p.s. don't forget to sign your posts with four tiles like this~~~~

Ruanua 08:23, 25 April 2007 (UTC) Hi JK

you said: So the question is 'how notable is Climaction?'; Greenpeace, Earth First, Campaign against Cliamte Change have all been written about by mainstreem sources. Has it gained coverage in national press? Has it been written about in any mainstream political journals? Was it set up by/does it involve an activist/activists who are notable (and might have wikipedia pages allready)? Is it linked to/the sister organisation of any notable international group? etc.

If you think that you can demonstrate this level of notability then you can get a Deletion review, please read more info on that page.

Climaction was subject of a TVNZ 15 minute documentary when Al Gore came to New Zealand [1], and have had extensive coverage in the mainstream press and radio networks here, most notably for our work in organising the protest for the International Day of Action on Climate Change on Nov 4th 2006, and the Carmaggedon protest for Free and Frequent Public Transport on March 3rd 2007.

It has been written about in political journals with mass publication such as the Workers' Charter newspaper, the Unity journal (NZ's premier Marxist publication) etc. It involves many notable NZ activists and individuals from groups such as Socialist Worker, Radical Youth and the Greens and has been supported by people such as Sue Bradford, Laila Harré, John Minto, Simon Oosterman, Matt McCarten, Christine Caughey, Grant Morgan and the Residents Action Movement who polled over 89,000 votes in the last city elections. It is connected nationally with the Climate Defence Network and works alongside GreenPeace New Zealand, and has sisterly contacts with international groups such as Rising Tide and the UK based Campaign against Climate Change.

Climaction article in the NZ Herald (Aotearoa's paper of record) [2]

Climaction article in the Aucklander newspaper (distribution in tens of thousands) [3]

Review of Climate Change UNITY in widely respected Green Left Weekly with history of CLimaction [4]

CLimaction reported on the Global Peace and Justice Auckland Newsletter (mail out 20,000 strong thru NZ) [5]

CLimaction civil disobedience supported by Auckland Regional Councillor [6]

Prominent trade unionists and leftists support Climaction- quotes [7]

American TV station in Manhattan covers Climaction protest for International Day of Action [8]

Biggest national Animal welfare group reports on CLimaction carnival [9]

Climaction protest covered by Global Climate Campaign website [10]

Critical Times review of "System Change not Climate Change" handbook sold by Climaction [11]

Climate Defence Network- list of supporting organisations in New Zealand (Climaction included) [12]

Its website has more info backing up these claims with quotes and links to media articles at www.climaction.org.nz

Image:Ukwatch logo.png

Hello JK the unwise, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:Ukwatch logo.png) was found at the following location: User:JK the unwise. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not re-add the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Please note that it is possible that the image on your page is included vie a template or usebox. In that case, please find a free image for the template or userbox. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 05:26, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Blair Peach

Thanks for that.

Non-free use disputed for Image:Ukwatch logo.png

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Ukwatch logo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:27, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:StWC Logo.png

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:StWC Logo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:44, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of List of locations which held February 15, 2003 anti-war protests

An article that you have been involved in editing, List of locations which held February 15, 2003 anti-war protests, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of locations which held February 15, 2003 anti-war protests. Thank you. -- Jreferee ^(Talk) 18:31, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of The Left and war

The Left and war, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that The Left and war satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Left and war (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of The Left and war during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. -- Jreferee ^(Talk) 19:20, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

Connections (history project)

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Connections (history project), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. Roleplayer 01:28, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Socialist Review Cover.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Socialist Review Cover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:24, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Respect logo.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Respect logo.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Undeath (talk) 01:16, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Socialist Worker Logo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Socialist Worker Logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:03, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:Respect logo.png)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Respect logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ZooFari 15:43, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Cairo antiwar conference speeker.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Cairo antiwar conference speeker.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 20:16, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Feb15 Poster Amsterdam.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Feb15 Poster Amsterdam.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 09:06, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Feb15 Poster Athens.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Feb15 Poster Athens.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 09:07, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Feb15 Poster Copenhagan.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Feb15 Poster Copenhagan.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 09:08, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Feb 15 Poster Madrid.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Feb 15 Poster Madrid.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 09:08, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Feb15 Poster.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Feb15 Poster.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 09:08, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Feb15 Poster Seattle.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Feb15 Poster Seattle.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 09:08, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:PDFlink

Template:PDFlink has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Lexein (talk) 12:57, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:3rd ESF london.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:10, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WPA listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wikipedia:WPA. Since you had some involvement with the Wikipedia:WPA redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 15:40, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of UK Watch for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article UK Watch is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UK Watch until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 00:04, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Ukwatch logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ukwatch logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:19, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

"Protests agianst the Invation of Afganistan" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Protests agianst the Invation of Afganistan. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 June 3#Protests agianst the Invation of Afganistan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. AllegedlyHuman (talk) 12:27, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

Left-wing terrorism

Hi, I've listed Left-Wing terrorism in Articles for Deletion. You were involved previously when it was discussed and you may be interested. AlanS^talk 08:56, 29 July 2023 (UTC)