User talk:Izzy259

Beverley Sharp

Welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome your help to create new content, but your recent additions (such as Beverley Sharp) are considered nonsense. Please refrain from creating nonsense articles. If you want to test things out, edit the sandbox instead. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Proofreader J-Man 20:38, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

Inappropriate Articles

Please do not violate Wikipedia policy by introducing inappropriate pages, such as Flashportal.com to Wikipedia. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. . EliminatorJR ^Talk 01:01, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

I Don't know why Flashportal.com is inappropriate, but as it has been deleted TWICE, I will not re-create it again. --Izzy259

Flower (Meerkat)

This article has been nominated for deletion (or has already been deleted). Don't be discouraged! Many of us have had articles deleted, especially early in our wikicareers. Deletion is not a reflection on your editing but simply the application of our standard rules, particularly WP:NOTABILITY (and WP:BIO for persons, WP:WEB for websites, WP:CORP for companies, WP:MUSIC for bands, and so forth.) Looking forward to your future contributions, Herostratus 04:21, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

Flashportal.com

Hi - the reason this article was deleted twice was because if you create an article about a website, you need to show that the website is notable (or important). This is usually done by providing links to the website to show that it has been mentioned elsewhere, perhaps by newspapers, magazines or other well-known websites. (see WP:WEB).

However, you can't use links that have been created by the subject (so, for example if you created a website about your school, you couldn't use a youtube.com film about the school that you filmed yourself). Hope this helps! EliminatorJR ^Talk 12:13, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

Axe-C-Dent

A tag has been placed on Axe-C-Dent, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. ArglebargleIV 16:02, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

List of minor Robot Wars contestants (UK)

As per the title, please do not edit List of minor Robot Wars contestants (UK). You are causing problems with the article redirection. It was decided through THIS AfD not to delete minor articles on Robot Wars, but instead to merge them into a single article. If you insert links into the merge article, then anyone clicking on them is merely redirected back to the original article. Thankyou. EliminatorJR ^Talk 18:50, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

Please read the above message again. You edited List of minor Robot Wars contestants (UK) and caused problems with the redirects. Thankyou. EliminatorJR ^Talk 19:05, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

OK, I'll explain. On a large number of occasions, it has been suggested that the articles on the various robots in Robot Wars should all be deleted, because they don't meet Wikipedia's standards for notability (see WP:NOTE). However, some people thought that was a bad idea, because some of the robots are quite famous (for instance, Chaos2 or HypnoDisc). So instead of deleting everything, it was decided that the famous robots should remain, but all the other articles should be merged into a single article (List of minor Robot Wars contestants (UK)). The original pages will now point to that article. EliminatorJR ^Talk 19:11, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

March 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Unfortunately, an article you recently created, Ol Del Paso, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new articles, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do and please read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. ⇒ SWATJester ^{On Belay!} 22:26, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

PS: It's Old El Paso, not Ol Del Paso. ⇒ SWATJester ^{On Belay!} 22:27, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Same with The Revolutionist. We do not need separate articles on every robot that has ever been seen on Robot Wars. NawlinWiki 02:59, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Android Love

An editor has nominated Android Love, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Android Love and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 17:23, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

Little Fly

Hello, do you know something about Little Fly robot that can be added to the List of minor Robot Wars contestants (UK) article. I know that it competed in Series 4 and that it had a spinning blade at the front of the bot but I don't know much more than that. Sentone 17:52, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

Robot Wars

Please desist from adding made-up info the the Robot Wars article. Your addition of nonsense weight classes has been reverted. Run Amok 01:06, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

Hi - About Crushtacean, I just copied the original articles on the robots into the main article - I've got no idea if the information's actually right! If it isn't, feel free to change it. EliminatorJR ^Talk 20:55, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

You don't need to ask the person who created the article to move information, just be WP:BOLD and go ahead and do it! Can I suggest, though, that you move your article to "List of Robot Wars contestants (Non-UK)" as it's easier for someone to find - you don't need the "Minor and Significant" bit :) EliminatorJR ^Talk 20:19, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

I've moved the page for you. It's now here List of Robot Wars Contestants (Non-UK). To rename a page, simply use the "Move" tab at the top of the article. EliminatorJR ^Talk 14:44, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Test pages: User talk

Please do not create test pages in the article namespace, as you did with User talk. To experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you, Black Falcon 18:56, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Oh, I see. No problem. I wouldn't have even noticed it except for that it was deleted at WP:RFD just a few days ago (and I still had the page on my watchlist) for being a cross-namespace redirect and creating potential confusion for new users who stumble across an article whose title resembles the [[User talk:]] namespace. -- Black Falcon 20:10, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Warning

Please as it is inappropiate to put fake notices for messages on even your user page. If this continues I will have to reprt this to an administrator--Dwrules 14:30, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

It is not against policy, and is therefore not serious enough to report. It is, however, confusing for new users, and some editors with slow internet connections may not appreciate having to load a page for no good reason. It's your choice whether to have it on your page or not, but you'll probably get complaints from others. Hope that helps! · AndonicO ^Talk 15:33, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

I have had to delete the inapropiate notices(and the £1000 one) due to a number of complaints--Dwrules 17:00, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

and again, this really must stop! --click here 07:10, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Hi, just to let you know that you're free to revert any edits that Dwrules makes to your userpage, and I'm going to have a word with him now. He's being a bit authoritarian.--Rambutan (talk) 12:19, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Robot Wars

Listen, I've tried asking nicely. I asked nicely for you not to write "Competed in/with" because it sounds silly. I asked nicely not to seperate robots from the same team because it is pointless. I asked nicely to check how a robot did and what it got up to without making assumptions because...well, this is an encyclopedia. Yet your additions of Reactor and Rhino blatantly went against all THREE of those requests (obviously the second one, because they were seperate). What do I actually have to say? I'm trying not to be rude here.

Thanks

Thanks Izzy259 for that nice welcoming letter. Beckenburg 13:18, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

Dwrules

Hi, please stop your pointless argument with Dwrules. He can copy your userboxes if he wants, and your squabbles aren't helping the encyclopedia.--Rambutan (talk) 15:21, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

• I'm not disallowing him from copying them, but I just don't like copying personalities.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Izzy259 (talk • contribs)

Right, this is now ridiculous. Stop being disruptive. He can copy your userboxes if he wants, and your squabbles aren't helping the encyclopedia, like I said before. See WP:POINT.--Rambutan (talk) 15:51, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Robot Wars - Robots grouped together.

As I believe I have stated before, I don't think it neccessary for robots created by the same team to be seperated. My personal opinion is that, if two robots share the same team, they should be in the same article (Mace and Gemini go together, as do Pussycat and Bodyhammer). I can't be fairer than that, so why I'm finding myself reading articles where Prometheus is seperate from General Carnage (even though they were created by the same team) and Talos and T2 together (when they are completely unrelated) is beyond me. Why else do you think I constantly deleted your "Cunning Plan" series article? Just a reminder in future. 80.43.132.147 08:53, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Commercial use of Image:Behemoth Robot.jpg

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Behemoth Robot.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Behemoth Robot.jpg is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only" or "used with permission for use on Wikipedia only" which was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19 or is not used in any articles (CSD I3).

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Image:Behemoth Robot.jpg itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. If you have any questions about what to do next or why your image was nominated for speedy deletion please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thanks. --Android Mouse Bot 2 15:01, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Commercial use of Image:Razer Robot.jpg

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Razer Robot.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Razer Robot.jpg is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only" or "used with permission for use on Wikipedia only" which was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19 or is not used in any articles (CSD I3).

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Image:Razer Robot.jpg itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. If you have any questions about what to do next or why your image was nominated for speedy deletion please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thanks. --Android Mouse Bot 2 15:01, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Commercial use of Image:Panic Attack Robot.jpg

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Panic Attack Robot.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Panic Attack Robot.jpg is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only" or "used with permission for use on Wikipedia only" which was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19 or is not used in any articles (CSD I3).

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Image:Panic Attack Robot.jpg itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. If you have any questions about what to do next or why your image was nominated for speedy deletion please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thanks. --Android Mouse Bot 2 15:16, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Commercial use of Image:Ewe 2 Current Robot Form.jpg

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Ewe 2 Current Robot Form.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Ewe 2 Current Robot Form.jpg is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only" or "used with permission for use on Wikipedia only" which was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19 or is not used in any articles (CSD I3).

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Image:Ewe 2 Current Robot Form.jpg itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. If you have any questions about what to do next or why your image was nominated for speedy deletion please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thanks. --Android Mouse Bot 2 15:17, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Roaming Robots

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Roaming Robots, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.

Izzy, there's no way this is a viable article at the moment. From reading it, people can't even tell what it's about. Please fix it with some references and expand it.EliminatorJR ^Talk 16:22, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Redirect of List of Robot Wars Minibots

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on List of Robot Wars Minibots, by SXT40 (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because List of Robot Wars Minibots is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting List of Robot Wars Minibots, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 10:38, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Finley The Fire Engine

A tag has been placed on Finley The Fire Engine, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Realkyhick 19:44, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Hypno-Disc Robot.gif

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Hypno-Disc Robot.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 08:31, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Hypno-Disc Robot.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Hypno-Disc Robot.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:04, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Spider-Pig (song)

A tag has been placed on Spider-Pig (song), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. WebHamster 09:53, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Princess Peach Standard.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Princess Peach Standard.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 13:47, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Image:101_Robot.gif listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:101_Robot.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 17:05, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

Image:Cyrax_robot.gif listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Cyrax_robot.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 17:07, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

Image:Derek_Robot.gif listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Derek_Robot.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 17:10, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Panic Attack Robot.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Panic Attack Robot.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -mattbuck 00:17, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

MatchUp

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article MatchUp, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of MatchUp. Jfire (talk) 16:16, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Hi there

Hi there how are you doing and funney jokes there funney i like the fatlantic one and the Golfer one. ~~~~(Gene Autry rules!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!) (talk) 23

45, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Image:Axe-C-Dent II.gif listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Axe-C-Dent II.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Undeath (talk) 20:21, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Robot Wars Wiki

Hi there, Robot Wars fan! I thought you might like to know that I have recently started a new Robot Wars Wiki on Wikia.com which can be found here. The Wiki is in its very early stages at the moment and it would be great if you could help to make it a success. The reason I have started it is because there is a limit to the amount of articles that can be made about Robot Wars on Wikipedia and you may know that most of the articles about individual robots have been removed from the site due to notability issues. I am therefore inviting all fans of the show to use the Robot Wars Wiki as a new home for all Robot Wars articles that can or cannot make it onto Wikipedia and together we can make the biggest database of Robot Wars content on the worldwide web. It would be great if you could help out and also tell other Robot Wars fans you may know about the site. Thank you! Christophee (talk) 01:20, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Image:Aggrobot 3.gif listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Aggrobot 3.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? —Bkell (talk) 02:51, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Tornado vs. Hypno-Disc.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Tornado vs. Hypno-Disc.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.  Channel ®    15:29, 8 May 2008 (UTC) -- Channel ®    15:29, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Which Howden school?

Hi Izzy: in the article on Medieval Adventure you've got a link to Howden School, but this leads to a disambiguation page - you need to choose one of the various schools listed there. Similarly, you had a link to PC, but I've "disambiguated" that one: always worth checking that all your links point to useful pages, not to further choices. Best wishes, PamD (talk) 11:37, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Cabri Plus

A tag has been placed on Cabri Plus requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. – moonty (talk) (contribs) 10:01, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Cabri Plus II

A tag has been placed on Cabri Plus II requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. – moonty (talk) (contribs) 10:03, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of "Realtek Audio"

A page you created, Realtek Audio, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a real person, group of people, band, club, company, organisation, or web content, but does not indicate why its subject is important or significant.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thanks. BigHairRef | Talk 10:01, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Cabri Plus

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Cabri Plus, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Black Kite 17:44, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Image:Fizzy Blue Bottles.jpg

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Image:Fizzy Blue Bottles.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.sweetsncandy.co.uk/prodimages/blubot_l.jpg. As a copyright violation, Image:Fizzy Blue Bottles.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Image:Fizzy Blue Bottles.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at [[Talk:Image:Fizzy Blue Bottles.jpg]] and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at [[Talk:Image:Fizzy Blue Bottles.jpg]] with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on [[Talk:Image:Fizzy Blue Bottles.jpg]].

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. McWomble (talk) 13:02, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Roadblock Robot.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Roadblock Robot.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — neuro^(talk) 11:13, 1 December 2008 (UTC) --— neuro^(talk) 11:13, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Fizzy Blue Bottles

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as Fizzy Blue Bottles, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Bongomatic 05:22, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Fizzy Blue Bottles

I have nominated Fizzy Blue Bottles, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fizzy Blue Bottles. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Bongomatic 05:38, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Medieval Adventure

I have nominated Medieval Adventure, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Medieval Adventure. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Salavat (talk) 04:39, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Tudor Adventure

I have nominated Tudor Adventure, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tudor Adventure. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Salavat (talk) 04:39, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

File:Granny's Revenge 2.gif listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Granny's Revenge 2.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 22:07, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Nintendo 64 Emulator

I have nominated Nintendo 64 Emulator, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nintendo 64 Emulator. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Halsteadk (talk) 22:23, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

File:259 Robot.gif listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:259 Robot.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 22:19, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Typhoon 2 Robot.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Typhoon 2 Robot.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:22, 22 February 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 00:22, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Firestorm VI.gif

Thank you for uploading File:Firestorm VI.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:23, 22 February 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 00:23, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Tornado S5.gif

Thank you for uploading File:Tornado S5.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:23, 22 February 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 00:23, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Tornado S6.gif

Thank you for uploading File:Tornado S6.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:23, 22 February 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 00:23, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

File source problem with File:S3 Robot.gif

Thank you for uploading File:S3 Robot.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:23, 22 February 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 00:23, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Axe-C-Dent.gif

Thank you for uploading File:Axe-C-Dent.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:23, 22 February 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 00:23, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

File source problem with File:A-Kill.gif

Thank you for uploading File:A-Kill.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:24, 22 February 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 00:24, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Mousetrap 2.gif

Thank you for uploading File:Mousetrap 2.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:24, 22 February 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 00:24, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Wild Thing Robot.gif

Thank you for uploading File:Wild Thing Robot.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:24, 22 February 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 00:24, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Wild Thing 2.gif

Thank you for uploading File:Wild Thing 2.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:24, 22 February 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 00:24, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Derek 2.gif

Thank you for uploading File:Derek 2.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:24, 22 February 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 00:24, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Ethelbert the Tiger for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ethelbert the Tiger is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ethelbert the Tiger until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Launchballer 20:49, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Humphrey Smith

Hello, Izzy259,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Humphrey Smith should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Humphrey Smith .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, TheLongTone (talk) 15:34, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Tewwnies listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Tewwnies. Since you had some involvement with the Tewwnies redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Thegreatluigi (talk) 15:52, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Robot Fighting League

A tag has been placed on Category:Robot Fighting League requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:01, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

"Dark Bones" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Dark Bones. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 28#Dark Bones until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC⁶⁷⁸ 23:55, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

"Dull Bones" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Dull Bones. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 28#Dull Bones until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC⁶⁷⁸ 23:55, 28 March 2021 (UTC)