User talk:Itsupforgrabsnow

Welcome!

Hello, Itsupforgrabsnow, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Baerke van der Meji, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Mephistophelian (talk) 23:17, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Baerke van der Meji

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Baerke van der Meji, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Mephistophelian (talk) 23:17, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

April 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Bicycle kick, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Jameboy (talk) 23:01, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

May 2011

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2011 Football League Championship Play-off Final with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Harry (talk) 16:01, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Category:People from Leitrim, to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Mephistophelian (talk) 18:51, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:People from Leitrim

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Category:People from Leitrim, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Mephistophelian (talk) 18:51, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to User:Moss65. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to a loss of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Tbhotch* ^{۩ ۞} 18:52, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Do not create, add, or restore hoaxes to Wikipedia, such as you did with the article User:Sean63. Hoaxes are caught and marked for deletion shortly after they are created. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia – and then to correct them if possible. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia to learn more about this project and how you can contribute constructively. Thank you. Mephistophelian (talk) 18:53, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of "Wikipedia pages that are knowingly a bit quirky"

A page you created, Wikipedia pages that are knowingly a bit quirky, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it redirects from an implausible misspelling.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Mouse Nightshirt | talk 15:19, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Girls love Gareth Bale

A tag has been placed on Girls love Gareth Bale, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to an article talk page, file description page, file talk page, MediaWiki page, MediaWiki talk page, category talk page, portal talk page, template talk page, help talk, user page, user talk or special page from the main/article space.

If you can fix the redirect to point to a mainspace page, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you are fixing the redirect. If you think the redirect should be retained as is for some reason, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the article's talk page directly to give your reasons. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Peter E. James (talk) 23:12, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not create attack pages as you did at Robbie Savage is an idiot. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images, especially those in violation of our biographies of living persons policy, will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Peter E. James (talk) 23:12, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Ian Goodison. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Peter E. James (talk) 23:24, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Fan's Favourite

The article Fan's Favourite has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article is only a dictionary definition and an unverifiable list

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Peter E. James (talk) 15:06, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've also tagged Huddersfield Town F.C. - The Fans' Favourites for deletion as it doesn't seem to be a useful redirect - it's the title of a book, and an article had existed but was deleted. Peter E. James (talk) 15:10, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked for 72 hours for continuing to create nonsensical articles and engaging in other forms of nonconstructive editing despite repeated warning to stop. If you resume this behavior after your block expires, you will be permanently blocked. AmiDaniel (talk) 18:43, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. Itsupforgrabsnow (talk) 13:56, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It'll take more than "sorry" to prove that you have the inclination to act in a more constructive manner. – Pee Jay 18:13, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Presumably

the spaces you added in the middle of the word "publisher" in a citation with this edit to Countdown (game show) were accidental, rather than you going straight back to your disruptive ways? Struway2 (talk) 20:20, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

May 2011 still

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Graham Rix. Thank you. Struway2 (talk) 17:00, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.

Please stop making silly disruptive edits such as this at Michael Ball (footballer), this at Yossi Benayoun, where you removed the last bit of a sentence as well as the nonsense your edit summary claimed, and these at John Robertson (footballer born 1964), where the edit summary claimed to be undoing your first piece of vandalism, but in fact actually replaced that vandalism with another. Struway2 (talk) 12:19, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Peter van der Sluis

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Peter van der Sluis requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. WWGB (talk) 11:49, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Paul Heynen

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Paul Heynen requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. WWGB (talk) 11:50, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Soccerbase/sandbox

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Template:Soccerbase/sandbox, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Gurt Posh (talk) 09:43, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Soccerbase manager/sandbox

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Template:Soccerbase manager/sandbox, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Gurt Posh (talk) 09:43, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your edit to User:Jimbo online

It is generally considered bad form to edit another editor's user page, especially if your edit breaks the formatting of their user page. If User:Jimbo online does not want to have a disclaimer that he is not Jimmy Wales, then that is his prerogative and you should not add one. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:52, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nas Beshir

The article Nas Beshir has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Regards, SunCreator ^(talk) 20:04, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Spots v Stripes Challenge Bar

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Spots v Stripes Challenge Bar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. -- Thomas888b (Say Hi) 17:07, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Spots v Stripes Challenge Bar

The article Spots v Stripes Challenge Bar has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This page does not seem to meet Wikipedia's quality guidelines. It appears that the creator isn't interested in improving it. I believe that this article would be better placed as a section of List of Cadbury products.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Thomas888b (Say Hi) 09:23, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Damian Forde

The article Damian Forde has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. N^oformation ^Talk 22:38, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tomas Forde

The article Tomas Forde has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. N^oformation ^Talk 22:38, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning

Please stop creating articles that do not meet Wikipedia's standards on notability and verifiability, such as Tomas Forde. This is your absolute final warning. If you continue these inappropriate creations, you will be indefinitely blocked from editing. Prolog (talk) 13:39, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A pie for you!

i love you here is my pie Itsupforgrabsnow (talk) 13:31, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

hEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE — Preceding unsigned comment added by Itsupforgrabsnow (talk • contribs) 14:04, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

My talk page

Um, what on earth was this all about? Giant Snowman 00:50, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm leaving wikipedia. When i mixed up my user page with different pages the saturday before last, i had to change my name to User:Klitschkokid. Since then i've settled as Klitschkokid and i'm closing my accountKlitschkokid (talk) 15:40, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Wikipedians with football infoboxes

Category:Wikipedians with football infoboxes, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Pichpich (talk) 14:43, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Famous Back Four for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Famous Back Four is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Famous Back Four until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Fol de rol troll (talk) 19:29, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:7.^Terry Christian - My Word , Orion publishing ,2006

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Template:7.^Terry Christian - My Word , Orion publishing ,2006, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. The ChampionMan 1234 00:53, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Itsupforgrabsnow/The Ultimate Entertainers

Please do not create hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at User:Itsupforgrabsnow/The Ultimate Entertainers. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 18:45, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Netbusters

The article Netbusters has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not a single source found anywhere.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 23:53, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]