User talk:Italik

Welcome!

Hello, Italik, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! TenOfAllTrades(talk) 15:30, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Red links and editing

Hi! I see that you're removing a lot of links to nonexistent articles (red links). While an overabundance of red links in an article can indicate a problem, not all red links are bad. They can encourage other editors to write new articles on these missing topics. Please don't unlink red links that point to topics that represent likely Wikipedia article titles.

One more thing — I notice that you haven't gotten into the habit of consistently using edit summaries. Try to remember to do this, as it makes it easier for other editors to understand what changes you've made to an article. If you would like to be reminded to always use edit summaries, you can tick the Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary box in the Editing tab of your Preferences.

Thanks! TenOfAllTrades(talk) 15:30, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Alice in Wonderland (2010 film), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Alientraveller (talk) 12:36, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 2008

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Kiefer Sutherland, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. I see you're in a hurry to delete items up for fact checking; if you must do so for whatever reason, at least make sure your edit doesn't leave the article worse in terms of sentence fragments or other poor English as your edit in this article did. Consider using the preview button and valuing quality over quantity. Thanks. Quaeler (talk) 19:43, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/AlexLevyOne(4th). Thank you. JohnInDC (talk) 17:29, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Per the above message and your recent edits, which are largely unhelpful, I've blocked you indefinitely; this does not mean infinitely, it's just that I am not satisfied that you understand our major policies here. I advise you to read the above report, and if you wish, respond here. I will copy your comments to that page. Meanwhile, I think that on balance you should not be editing at the moment. --Rodhull andemu 03:12, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kourtrajmé

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Kourtrajmé, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Notability not established, and, based on web searches, not apparent.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. JohnInDC (talk) 02:27, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]