Jump to content

User talk:Intalk

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

November 2020

[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Nagma. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Do not change/remove sourced content without consensus, which you need to gain in the article talk page. Discuss your points one at a time in the talk page. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:35, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


  • The source information on the page mentioned above Nagma was derogatory and was not authentic as it was most probably copied from deadlinks. Therefore I removed it, however since you are not happy with my work, I will drop it.Intalk (talk) 10:42, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Notice

The article Nicolle Verma has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. -- D'n'B-t -- 13:25, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,
Several references and articles and citations have been added to the article Nicolle Verma. When the article was created, it was pure text that was typed and references added later with photos from wikimedia commons and other public sources. You may remove the notice pertaining to removal of the said article as it now adheres to wikipedia policies and rules.
Intalk (talk) 15:35, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nicolle Verma for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nicolle Verma is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicolle Verma until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Nxcrypto Message 15:27, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Several references and articles and citations have been added to the article Nicolle Verma. When the article was created, it was pure text that was typed and references added later with photos from wikimedia commons and other public sources.
You may remove the notice pertaining to removal of the said article as it now adheres to wikipedia policies and rules. Intalk (talk) 15:35, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Intalk. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Abhishek Verma (arms dealer), you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.  Sumanuil. (talk to me) 07:45, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Sumanuil.
I have zero paid promotion here.
However, I find their family interesting and colourful. Hence I take time out to edit and update their pages. Someone has to do it - there are billions of pages on wikipedia and not everyone can edit each page / articles. Let’s say I am their FAN. Does that count as conflict of interest? Let me know and I will make amends and disclose on the relevant pages.
Also note that I am a regular contributor to wikipedia. If there was a way to, I could have sent you the most recent payments I have sent to Wikipedia just a few months back from India and received their thank you note too, twice this year and once last year. Send me your email address and I will send you the receipts from wikipedia.
Guide me thru this process please and Help. Intalk (talk) 08:13, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Intalk, if you don't have a conflict of interest then how were you able to take this photograph and also this one? Which you have labled as being your own work in both cases. -- D'n'B-t -- 20:25, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If you see above my reply to Sumanuil, posted yesterday - I already disclosed that I am a FAN of the subject. What is the big deal you are making here. Even after my clean disclosure that I made that I am a FAN still you are asking me questions as if I assassinated JFK. I took the photos myself and posted them. The rest of the articles are from public sources. You don't want to keep this article then delete it. Even after disclosure of all facts I am being interrogated like being at a Nazi camp.
Intalk (talk) 03:12, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think it's perfectly reasonable to ask how a fan would come to take what appears to be a posed photo at a private function. -- D'n'B-t -- 07:13, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Instead of being interrogated so much I prefer my article being deleted. Nothing I say will ever find merit with you and some others. Go ahead and kill the article. Intalk (talk) 08:39, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]