User talk:Illicit Vellichor

Welcome!

Hello, Illicit Vellichor, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as File:Jacob Elordi at the Euphoria Premiere.gif, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Railfan23 (talk) 05:16, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2024

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Killing of Brian Thompson. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. EvergreenFir (talk) 06:06, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is a talk page topic on this, but the biased source keeps getting put back despite no consensus being reached on the talk page. XXI (talk) 16:53, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@EvergreenFirwhy are the other editors allowed to add the text back before a consensus is reached on the talk page? Also, I thought we aren't supposed to use sources with editorial bias on Wikipedia? XXI (talk) 16:57, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Because you have reverted/removed the same content repeatedly. That's the definition of edit warring. EvergreenFir (talk) 18:16, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

because they keep putting it back?? Why is bias being allowed? XXI (talk) 21:42, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I honestly don't care about the bias or whatever. You may not edit war over it. Clearly other editors disagree with your assessment and you may not just insist on your preference. It's a poll by a firm that is known to have a right-leaning house effect and had been accused of working for the GOP without disclosing it. This is not a case of unambiguous vandalism or hate. This is a collaborative project and you either need to collaborate or find another hobby. EvergreenFir (talk) 00:40, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Noting five times the same content was removed by the same user in past week. [1][2][3][4][5] CNC (talk) 18:06, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
As well as these: [6], [7] EvergreenFir (talk) 18:39, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@CommunityNotesContributor@EvergreenFir The source is biased so I removed it, but it kept getting added back with no discussion. Why is that allowed if a consensus hasn't been reached on the topic? Why do they not have edit war on their talk pages? Also 6 and 7 I didn't remove the content, I added an in-text attribution which Wikipedia says to do for biased sources. XXI (talk) 21:53, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]