User talk:Humanrajang

MfD nomination of Draft:Brown

Draft:Brown, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Brown and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Brown during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Zinnober9 (talk) 19:40, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

January 2025

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Brown. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the AfD discussion page. Thank you. Nthep (talk) 20:24, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I understand it's frustrating when your work gets nominated for deletion but the response is not to pretend the nomination hasn't been made. As the nomination is based on the article being a hoax, you should concentrate on establishing that it isn't a hoax. The best way is to add reliable sources that show that it is real. Nthep (talk) 20:28, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Draft:Brown. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the AfD discussion page. Thank you. Zinnober9 (talk) 20:25, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. TornadoLGS (talk) 20:34, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The removal of the redirect was disruptive, especially if the draft you created is a hoax. TornadoLGS (talk) 20:36, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]