User talk:HoldenFan1104

November 2023

Hello, I'm Chaotic Enby. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Ford Fairmont have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. ChaotıċEnby(talk) 10:13, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Chaotic,

I was just changing the Ford Fairmont page to a redirect for the Australian and North American versions. The information in the Ford Fairmont page has been copied to the Ford Fairmont (North America) page.

Regards, Holden. HoldenFan1104 (talk) 10:15, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies, I was patrolling vandalism, saw a page blanking and didn't see you were building a disambig page. My bad. ChaotıċEnby(talk) 10:21, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies for not specifying in the edit reasons, will make sure to be more careful in the future.

Keep up the good work as always.

Regards, Holden. HoldenFan1104 (talk) 10:22, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Ford Fairmont a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 15:32, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the information, the only page where I have ever done a cut-and-past move is for the Ford Fairmont article.

Apologies for not moving the page, keep up the good work too.

Regards, Dark. HoldenFan1104 (talk) 04:54, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sydney, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page St Mary's Cathedral. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Checker Marathon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Manual.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tourism in Adelaide has been accepted

Tourism in Adelaide, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

RangersRus (talk) 17:28, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers HoldenFan1104 (talk) 23:23, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tourism in Adelaide moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Tourism in Adelaide. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and Most likely created by an LLM (Large-language model)/AI.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Cowboygilbert - (talk) ♥ 00:48, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Cowboygilbert,

I created the article to go alongside the other tourism articles for cities in Australia such as Perth, Melbourne, Brisbane, and Sydney, all of which are considerably small and read like advertisements. Is there any chance it could be reinstated as it goes well with them, AI was only used for reference and not for the actual publication of the article.

Kind regards. HoldenFan1104 (talk) 04:54, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@HoldenFan1104, I trusted one of my editor friends, @Chaotic Enby, for verification of the use of LLMs and they can verify the information. I can remove the promocruft and give you an idea of where to start next. But some of the most AI-like things are some of the word choices and sentence structuring which is a dead giveaway. No one types how the article is structured and if someone has shown it, it's most likely AI-generated. No one I have seen on Wikipedia use things like "cultural tapestry", "Visitors can indulge in a variety of foods", "fostering a deeper understanding of animal welfare and environmental stewardship", "the garden serves as a tranquil retreat within the city, ideal for leisurely strolls or quiet contemplation".

The most promocruft filled sections are Nature and wildlife, Shopping precincts, and Nearby attractions which all read like it's grabbed from some "Visit Australia!" website. Cowboygilbert - (talk) ♥ 05:07, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My mistake in that case, I will see if I can make it a bit more Wikipedia standard next time. Appreciate the info though. HoldenFan1104 (talk) 00:45, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]