User talk:Hila Livne

30 August 2022

Hello Hila Livne! Your additions to Controlled atmosphere have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Spintendo 13:23, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your feedback. I have changed the text, hoping it can stay now. Smock's contribution to Controlled Atmosphere is of high value and he must be included in it Hila Livne (talk) 14:25, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orit Fouks Rotem moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Orit Fouks Rotem, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. echidnaLives - talk - edits 02:03, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. I have based this article on the Hebrew one, but now added the sources and I hope it's enough. Regards Hila Livne (talk) 06:19, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Orit Fouks Rotem (November 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MurielMary was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Most of the section on "career" has no citations. Please add inline citations to reliable sources and re-submit.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Orit Fouks Rotem and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MurielMary (talk) 23:46, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hila Livne! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MurielMary (talk) 23:46, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Orit Fouks Rotem (November 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Devonian Wombat was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Cinema Sabaya. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Currently all the coverage of Rotem is related to Cinema Sabaya, with no coverage cited for any other event or film. As such, the content here should be partially merged to that page.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Orit Fouks Rotem and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Devonian Wombat (talk) 22:05, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vedette Lim (February 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by InterstellarGamer12321 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This BLP article has several uncited sentences. Independent, reliable references with significant coverage need to be added or the uncited information should be removed.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vedette Lim and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 17:38, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Orit Fouks Rotem

Hello, Hila Livne. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Orit Fouks Rotem, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:03, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vedette Lim (May 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

All statements need to be sourced, starting with the date of birth.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vedette Lim and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 19:33, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Autistic shutdown

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Autistic shutdown requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.autismparentingmagazine.com/manage-autism-shutdown/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 15:31, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

PS, Spintendo notified you last August (2022) to take care with copyright. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 15:33, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know Hila Livne (talk) 20:07, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Vedette Lim

Hello, Hila Livne. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Vedette Lim, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:01, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Vedette Lim

Hello, Hila Livne. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Vedette Lim".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:40, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Hila Livne (talk) 19:57, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sarah Powell

I noticed your post on the talk page of this article while patrolling Recent Changes. Looks like your concerns may have been correct. The article has now been listed at AfD as a hoax. Thanks for catching it after 15+ years. --Onorem (talk) 12:33, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the update Hila Livne (talk) 14:22, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Onorem I realize it was now deleted - thank you for the quick help on this matter Hila Livne (talk) 06:05, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that your recent edit to Autistic meltdown did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! Tacyarg (talk) 01:12, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK - Thank you Hila Livne (talk) 07:18, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

IOHANNVSVERVS (talk) 16:40, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ECR

Per WP:ARBECR and the above notice, please confine your edits in the topic area to the making of edit requests until the requirements are met. Thank you. Selfstudier (talk) 12:06, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK, Thank you Hila Livne (talk) 12:07, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Screams Before Silence

Hello, Hila Livne! Thank you for your contributions to the article about Screams Before Silence. I noticed several incorrect uses of prepositions in English -- "on" instead of "in". I'm assuming that English is not your native language, and prepositions can be very tricky. I'll also add that I removed some hyperlinks that you added. My intention was to delete repeated hyperlinks, and unless I made a mistake, I only removed those terms where a link was already provided. (Or moved it to the first mention of the term.) Jkgree (talk) 20:56, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @Jkgree- I appreciate your note Hila Livne (talk) 04:09, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edits on Eden Golan

Hi Hila, Please do not remove most on the information from the lede including sourced content without first establishing consensus on the talk page. This is a highly discussed and controversial topic and the current back and forth (from multiple editors) is not contributing to a solution.

Speederzzz (Talk) (Stalk me) 19:42, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK, Thanks for reaching out Hila Livne (talk) 04:34, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation

One of your recent edits has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. The copyright-violating edit that you made was this one. Boud (talk) 22:52, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Inappropriate

This diff " also the numbers here are made up, pro-terrorist have taken over English Wikipedia."

I suggest you strike this material. Selfstudier (talk) 09:24, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User has already been warned before about behavior in contentious topics. Mccartneyac (talk) 13:15, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Thank you Hila Livne (talk) 17:56, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, התיבה של נוח (סרט 2024)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, התיבה של נוח (סרט 2024). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Noah's Ark (2024 film). Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Noah's Ark (2024 film). If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. CycloneYoris ^talk! 22:07, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @CycloneYoris That was a mistake - I think it is a bug it was suposed to be published in Hebrew Hila Livne (talk) 22:20, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@CycloneYoris Please delete Hila Livne (talk) 05:50, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The page has already been deleted by an admin, and the link is now red (as you can verify above). CycloneYoris ^talk! 06:25, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

THank you, much appriciated and apologiez for the mistake @CycloneYoris Hila Livne (talk) 06:29, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome! CycloneYoris ^talk! 06:33, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]