User talk:Hemat Mustafa

December 2018

Hello, I'm Velella. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Sheikh Eid bin Mohammad Al Thani Charitable Association, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.  Velella  ^{Velella Talk}   06:35, 11 December 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Sheikh Eid bin Mohammad Al Thani Charitable Association, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you.  Velella  ^{Velella Talk}   06:57, 11 December 2018 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Sheikh Eid bin Mohammad Al Thani Charitable Association shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:26, 11 December 2018 (UTC)

Hemat Mustafa, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Hemat Mustafa! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:09, 11 December 2018 (UTC)

December 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Sheikh Eid bin Mohammad Al Thani Charitable Association.  Velella  ^{Velella Talk}   19:55, 11 December 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Drmies (talk) 04:56, 12 December 2018 (UTC)

Why I was blocked?

I don't know why I was blocked. I just added valid Information with approved references. Kindly Explain the reason for blocking me. Thank you

• No, the information wasn't "valid"--it was promotional. And I don't know what you mean with "approved references"--approved by who? Not by editors aware of WP:RS and WP:SECONDARY. Drmies (talk) 05:58, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
  • And you are still using other accounts despite your block. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 07:49, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hemat Mustafa, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Home Lander (talk) 20:30, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

December 2018

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- Scott (talk) 08:48, 25 December 2018 (UTC)