User talk:Hdaackda

January 2017

Hello, I'm DVdm. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Religious and philosophical views of Albert Einstein, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. DVdm (talk) 12:03, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

REPLY

Hello DVdm. Thank you for your message. I did provide a reference. Now, the reason I edited and inserted the word religious was because there have been a number of quotes of Einstein which give the impression that he did indeed believe in a God that created the universe. I didnt want to write ALL the quotes (they are from different books, written by friends on Einsteins) and their individual references. So I just included 1 source that references ALL the quotes. The link I inserted as reference was: Does Einstein Believe In God - If you see, if gives the quotes such as “My God created laws… His universe is not ruled by wishful thinking but by immutable laws.” and its referenced (from Max Jammer's book “Einstein and Religion: Physics and Theology”).

Now, since the topic is Religious and philosophical views of Albert Einstein, I do think all such quotes deserve a mention. Should we individually add all of them and reference each one or, like I did, just reference it once?? I am sure you can tell I am not an expert in editing on Wikipedia.

Regards

Hdaackda (talk) 20:06, 2 January 2017 (UTC)Hdaackda[reply]

@Hdaackda: If you check our policy on wp:verifiable sources, you will find that this particular source does not qualify for Wikipedia. It is a blog, holding someone's personal opinion. Anyone can write anything on a personal blog. Wikipedia needs wp:secondary sources. The best thing you can do, is to go to the article talk page Talk:Religious and philosophical views of Albert Einstein and open a new section (at the bottom) explaining what you would like to do. But make sure you have some solid sources (with page ISBN numbers and page numbers and such) at hand to support your proposal, as a personal website such as this certainly will not do. - DVdm (talk) 20:41, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@DVdm: thanks! Heading on to the talk page right now :)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Main (April 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

It appears that this page was mistakenly submitted to Articles for Creation, and is meant to be a user page. This is satisfactory as a preliminary user page. The Submit feature is for requesting that pages in draft space or user space be reviewed for inclusion as articles in Wikipedia. This is not and never will be an article. Now you know what Submit means. Just keep working on the user page.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Hdaackda/sandbox/Main and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Hdaackda/sandbox/Main, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 02:14, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hdaackda! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 02:14, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Food

Hello! After the successful pilot program by Wikimedia India in 2015, Wiki Loves Food (WLF) is happening again in 2018 and this year, it's going International. To make this event a grant success, your direction is key. Please sign up here as a volunteer to bring all the world's food to Wikimedia. Danidamiobi (talk) 23:19, 29 April 2018 (UTC) Danidamiobi (talk) 23:19, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Visa Inc.. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Stesmo (talk) 07:50, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:DGLD

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:DGLD requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://dailynewsfinancials.com/?p=247140. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. S Philbrick (Talk) 12:55, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:DGLD

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:DGLD requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://dailynewsfinancials.com/?p=247140. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. S Philbrick (Talk) 13:42, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Making minor changes, as you did, results in Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing, still a violation of copyright policy. S Philbrick (Talk) 13:44, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:DGLD

Hello, Hdaackda. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:DGLD, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:01, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:DGLD

Hello, Hdaackda. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "DGLD".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:19, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]