User talk:HXEG

Warnings

Thank you for your interest in improving wikipedia. Please don't insert unreferenced text into wikipedia, especially in such fundamental and controversial areas as philosophy. See our policy WP:CITE. Staszek Lem (talk) 19:44, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't revert back when someone reverts you without addressing the concerns with your edit. If there is a disagreement, please use article talk page to explain your edit. Staszek Lem (talk) 19:50, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Staszek Lem. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Ontology have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Staszek Lem (talk) 19:56, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Concept. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Fuck, you may be blocked from editing. Staszek Lem (talk) 20:02, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Fuck. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 20:22, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AN/I notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Staszek Lem (talk) 20:23, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Philosophy. You have been making a number of edits that have left the articles in worse shape than before you started. Further, you have not explained your edits at all. You must discuss what you're trying to accomplish with these edits, either at the talk pages of the respective articles or here at your user talk page. I would prefer that you choose you enter into this discussion voluntarily rather than having it forced upon you; however, if you keep making bad, unexplained edits, you will lose the ability to edit any page other than this user talk page. —C.Fred (talk) 20:39, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. RickinBaltimore (talk) 20:42, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Batman, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 19:39, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 19:42, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]