User talk:Gornos

This is Gornos's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Operation Tit (September 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tagishsimon was:

This submission appears to be a news report of a single event and may not be notable enough for an article in Wikipedia. Please see Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#NEWS and Wikipedia:Notability (people)#People notable for only one event for more information.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Operation Tit and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tagishsimon (talk) 23:03, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comment. This event became known only a day ago. In the coming days, more details about this operation will become known and I will supplement the article. Gornos (talk) 23:11, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gornos! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Tagishsimon (talk) 23:03, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Gornos! Your additions to Draft:Operation Tit have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 11:13, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gornos (talk) 16:32, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good afternoon. I have edited the article, but it needs grammatical correction because I don't know English well. Please help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Operation Tit has been accepted

Operation Tit, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 18:09, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Gornos. Thank you for your work on Operation Synytsia. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hey there! Hope you're having a great day. Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia with your article. I'm happy to inform you that your article has adhered to Wikipedia's policies, so I've marked it as reviewed. Have a fantastic day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 15:02, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Gornos (talk) 17:59, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andrew Kramer (November 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by F.Alexsandr was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Articles should follow WP:NPOV, and the Lead section clearly fails in that. Other than that I think the article is notable enough.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Andrew Kramer and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

F.Alexsandr (talk) 12:27, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gornos (talk) 19:00, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear colleague. Thank you for your participation and advice in creating this article. I tried to edit it in accordance with your recommendations and the advice of other colleagues.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andrew Kramer has been accepted

Andrew Kramer, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 19:13, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Gornos (talk) 19:32, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your Ukraine edits

Sorry, pal, but you have to be extended-confirmed in order to edit topics related to the Russo-Ukrainian war, broadly construed. You are not yet allowed to create articles relating to this topic. SparklyNights (t) 21:13, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Do I understand correctly that for this I need to meet two criteria: 30 days of experience and 500 edits? I hope my today article about the slogan “Nothing about Ukraine without Ukraine” will not be deleted? Gornos (talk) 21:22, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It might be deleted or merged into another article. Either way, that's not a big deal, everyone has had one or more of their articles deleted here on Wikipedia. SparklyNights (t) 21:47, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

But the articles usually are allowed up more than 30 minutes, per WP:BITE: Avoid deleting newly created articles, as inexperienced authors might still be working on them or trying to figure something out. But it does happen. Do save a copy of the most recent version off-site as if the page gets deleted (there's no warning as to the closing date/time), all your work is gone in a flash, and if you find a new debate-winning source next week, you'll be glad you kept a copy that you can resubmit. Cheers! BBQboffin^{grill me} 23:03, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You cannot yet participate in discussions about the Russo-Ukrainian war, broadly construed. Please read WP:GS/RUSUKR for more information. You need to become extended-confirmed in order to do that. SparklyNights (t) 23:48, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with you only partially. Wikipedia:GS/RUSUKR: Non-extended-confirmed-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace to post constructive comments and make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive. Gornos (talk) 16:22, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nothing about Ukraine without Ukraine for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nothing about Ukraine without Ukraine is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nothing about Ukraine without Ukraine until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

SparklyNights (t) 21:45, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Halifax International Security Forum, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Paul Owens, Tom Clark and David Kramer. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Gornos! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! BBQboffin^{grill me} 21:27, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Gornos (talk) 22:57, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

Please note that due to WP:RUSUKR, non-extended confirmed accounts are unable to make edits about Russia-Ukraine war. Thanks. Mellk (talk) 22:13, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A branstar for you!

		The Organical Branstar
		For your efforts to create new articles in spite of restrictions and opposition, especially for your well-sourced improvements to Nothing about Ukraine without Ukraine which saved it from deletion. BBQboffin^{grill me} 17:14, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much :) Gornos (talk) 19:30, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you haven't made any recent edits, and wanted to encourage you not to give up. The WP:RUSUKR policy was put in place to deter vandalism and propaganda, and I'm sorry that the bad acts of others has made it harder for you personally to immediately contribute in this particular topic area. So maybe add to something else that interests you for a while? Once you get to 500 edits (you're at around 150 now I think) you'll be extended-confirmed. Cheers! BBQboffin^{grill me} 17:14, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Likewise! There are plenty of articles on other subjects that need either minor or major editing. Experience editing on a variety of topics helps you to learn - especially cases of editing disagreements: healthy conflict resolution is often a good way of learning. Pages with too few editors that might interest you, though they only indirectly relate to the Russian invasion of Ukraine, are peace process related articles. Even fundamentally important articles such as 1986 Stockholm Document (https://www.osce.org/fsc/41238 OSCE indirect link) are missing. Boud (talk) 20:44, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]