User talk:Global Footprint Network

Welcome!

Hello, Global Footprint Network, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I notice that one of the first articles you edited was Ecological footprint, which appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or any other editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One firm rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The plain and simple conflict of interest guide
The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 00:04, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Dear Wikipedia editors,

We at Global Footprint Network would like to edit the Wikipedia article entitled, “Ecological Footprint.” Our goal is not to advertise our organization. Since the president of our organization is the co-creator of the Ecological Footprint, an environmental resource accounting tool, it is very important for us to communicate scientifically correct information about its history, methodology, and application. We stewarded the Footprint and it’s legitimated ecological resource accounting tool, which is used by many international organizations. WWF for example used our tool for their Living Planet Report. We tried to change the article completely because it has not been updated very recently and it contained some false information. In fact, we found some of the reference links to be obsolete or non - existent. We are certainly not promoting personal knowledge or suggestions; we are simply interested in spreading information about the Ecological Footprint in a scientific and adequate way. If you could provide some advice as to how to update the “Ecological Footprint” article successfully, we would very much welcome your feedback. Thank you for your help! Sincerely, Global Footprint Network Global Footprint Network (talk) 17:11, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Then please create an account that represents only you (one individual, one account, one password). Shared or corporate accounts are not acceptable. If there is a conflict of interest in the individual's account (an employee, editing the organization's articles, then please declare it up-front in your user page. As long as the edits are from a neutral point of view and any claims or assertions are backed up by independent, verifiable, reliable sources, there should be no issues. -- Alexf^(talk) 18:06, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! This Wikipedia username is an inappropriate username under Wikipedia's username policy. It is a violation of the role accounts section since it is an account that is promotional, representing a company, organisation or other group. I'd like to echo Alexf's comments above: "please create an account that represents only you (one individual, one account, one password). Shared or corporate accounts are not acceptable." This account has been reported to Wikipedia:Usernames for administrator attention for possible action. - tucoxn\^talk 21:31, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames that give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy. It also appears that your account is intended to be used for the purpose of telling the world about an organization or cause that you consider worthwhile. Unfortunately, many good causes are not sufficiently notable for their own Wikipedia article, and all users are discouraged from editing in any area where they have an inherent conflict of interest. You may wish to consider one of these alternative outlets.

If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice.

You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice. Thank you.

--Orange Mike | Talk 21:55, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Ecological Debt Day, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 18:47, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]