User talk:Georgethe23rd

Rothley

Thanks George.... could you use the ref tag? See the other refs in the article. Victuallers 13:02, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done (hopefully) - thanks for your help. Georgethe23rd 14:37, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Somerfield

Hi - I'm new and unsure how to correct the ongoing situation re Somerfield (UK retailer) "crew events", which you, me and others have taken similar action on recently. Any advice, or action we could take? Thanks Georgethe23rd 22:04, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm fairly new here myself, but the procedure for dealing with persistent vandalism is found at: WP:vandalism. To sum up, leave the appropriate warning templates on the vandal's talk page, then alert an Admin if all the warnings are ignored. Signalhead 22:10, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Georgethe23rd 07:59, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

About Robert Rosner

When searching for the Robert Rosner, rich guy on google etc ... you find a lot of stuff, for example BIO, revenues, company owned, etc... I am not comfortable with having this scientist have his page we should create the page on the financial Robert Rosner and protect it so that it can't be changed. Because i don't think that having put some scientist on Wikipedia is better than having a financial mogul who has been victim of wikipedia vandals. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 86.211.188.111 (talk • contribs) 11:08, 25 July 2007.

Hi

Saw your edits to MyFC - just wanted to say hi! sparkl_!sm ^talk 09:05, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sunday Times Rich List 2007

Thanks for your support and commiseration on that. I will think about re-creating the article, using just a selection of the list, which would be fair comment. I certainly think that the same scrutiny should be applied to List of billionaires (2007) which is basically a copy of Forbes's list. I see that a further article escaped the cull: Sunday Times Rich List 2005/Ireland. --mervyn 12:52, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My Football Club

Please do not revert my edits as vandalism - discuss first. Albatross2147 (talk) 23:21, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You're right. Sorry. Georgethe23rd (talk) 08:12, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs: John Bird (actor); Tattenhall; Jan Ravens; Charles Anderson-Pelham, 2nd Earl of Yarborough; Pendlebury; Cropston; Alberto y Lost Trios Paranoias; Stuart Murdoch (football manager); Hurley International; Charles Anderson-Pelham, 1st Earl of Yarborough; Swithland; Great Bowden; Muscle weakness; Great Doddington; Upper motor neurone lesion; Ohio Patriot Act; Woodhouse Eaves; Jon Peters; English Premier Ice Hockey League

Cleanup: The Manual; Martin and Lewis; Greg Proops
Merge: Fundraiser; History of money; London (orchestra)
Add Sources: Richard Fortescue, 7th Earl Fortescue; Big in Japan; Battlefield Line Railway
Wikify: Mick Jones (footballer); Watsonians RFC; Davies
Expand: People (magazine); New Zealand literature; Children of the Prime Ministers of Canada

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 20:39, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]