User talk:GeopoliticalSphygmomanometry

Hello, GeopoliticalSphygmomanometry, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! - wolf 01:44, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started

Finding your way around

Editing articles

Getting help

Frequently asked questions
Cheatsheet
Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse
The Help Desk, for more advanced questions
Help pages
Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles

How you can help

Community Portal
Join a WikiProject
Follow Wikipedia etiquette
Practice civility
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Teahouse Invitation

Hello! GeopoliticalSphygmomanometry, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 18:47, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Hello, I'm Adakiko. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Duty of care, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Adakiko (talk) 11:28, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:RSPSCRIPTURE Adakiko (talk) 11:29, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i was just about to add the source... GeopoliticalSphygmomanometry (talk) 11:31, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

M.Bitton (talk) 19:27, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

thank you GeopoliticalSphygmomanometry (talk) 21:38, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This and other edits of yours (including one that was made three days after you thanked me for the above alert) are in clear violation of the WP:PIA restrictions. More of the same will lead to you being reported to the admins without warning. M.Bitton (talk) 15:00, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Can you please explain how exactly I violated the WP:PIA restrictions? I don't really understand.... GeopoliticalSphygmomanometry (talk) 15:07, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Everything you need to know is explained in the linked articles, including WP:ARBECR that I cited while reverting your first edit. M.Bitton (talk) 15:11, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see, thank you. I imagine you are referring to the following: "Should disruption occur on "Talk:" pages, administrators may take enforcement actions..."

I understand that you considered my writing on the talk page to be a "disruption" and therefore allowed yourself to take action on it. However, Wikipedia's rules define it so, and I quote:

I see, thank you. I imagine you are referring to the following: "Should disruption occur on "Talk:" pages, administr.t Would you care to explain how my recommendations on the talk page form a pattern of editing that disrupts progress toward improving the article? Dare I say, I actually see my recommendations as the very progress itself toward improving the article. It certainly doesn't disrupt such progress. If so you claim, as apparently it seems you do, please explain how that is the case. Thanks again!s may take enforcement actions".

ors may take enforcement actions..."

I see, thank you. I imagine you are referring to the following: "Should disruption occur on "Talk:" pages, administrators may take enforcement actions..." GeopoliticalSphygmomanometry (talk) 14:13, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing to do with disruption. You may make a formal edit request, but that's all. No further comments. Doug Weller talk 17:19, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain what I have missed here. I don't get it. GeopoliticalSphygmomanometry (talk) 16:29, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kamal Mansour moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Kamal Mansour. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. jlwoodwa (talk) 23:49, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I appreciate that! GeopoliticalSphygmomanometry (talk) 22:39, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Contentious topics alert for edits related to post-1992 American politics

You have recently made edits related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. This is a standard message to inform you that post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. Doug Weller talk 17:20, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Doug! GeopoliticalSphygmomanometry (talk) 12:52, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ARBECR violation (again)

Is there a reason you keep ignoring the restrictions (that have been explained to you)? M.Bitton (talk) 20:59, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I'm sorry. I don't understand. Which restrictions have I violated? I have not edited a page, but merely argued a proposed point in the discussion on the talk page... I am missing something here? My apologies if I have violated any guidelines, I have no intention of doing such a thing. GeopoliticalSphygmomanometry (talk) 16:26, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@GeopoliticalSphygmomanometry You can only use article talk pages to make a formal edit request per Wikipedia:Edit requests. Once you've made it you can't comment on it as you did at Special:Diff/1263995132. You also can't comment on user talk pages. Doug Weller talk 16:55, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

World Rapid and Blitz

Re this edit where your removed mention of the women from the tournament... the "Rapid and Blitz Championship" includes the Women's section... my only question for you is... was your edit a) sloppy or b) intended to provoke? Because if it's b), you have succeeded. Either way, knock it off. Marcus Markup (talk) 19:33, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

If you had taken half a minute to look at the examples from previous years, you would have gained a clue. Your edit was simply inexcusable.e Marcus Markup (talk) 19:42, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Battalion 101 (Israel)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Battalion 101 (Israel), was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other test edits you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Heart ^(talk) 05:55, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]