User talk:Gbfalcone

Changes

I added some changes to your article and I wrote in your discussion tab in your article for some extra ideas for you two. Anderskr (talk) 11:42am, 2, May 2011 ( UTC)

Edits

Hi Gbfalcone. I understand you are still editing the document as james and I are still doing with ours. I think your layout looks great so far but I haven't had the time to really look at it. I do have one suggestion. For the Title WHAT'S AT STAKE, it sounds a little out of sink with the rest of the description labels. You could label it Adverse effects or Consequences on the Ecosystem or just Consequences on the Environment. Something along those lines, if you want. Thank you for volunteering to look at ours as well. [User:Anderskr|Anderskr]] (talk) 20:21, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talk

What habitat conversation plan are you interested in or are you interested in doing, aquatic, wildlife or a broad overview? Anderskr (talk) 19:59 , 1 April 2011 (PST)

Gil, Found as you are probably aware, a good amount of information on the Entergy v. Riverkeeper... but some of the documents have been pretty lengthy. The Burlington Northern.. not sure about. Who did they oppose? Cammauf1 (talk) 04:45, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Online Ambassadors

Hi Gil - I saw your note that you had trouble finding an online ambassador. As per the Course page, these online ambassadors have volunteered to work with our class. Cullen328 (Jim) will actually be at class this Saturday.

  1. User:Ironholds 
  2. User:Cullen328
  3. User:Sodabottle
  4. User:Ling.Nut

Jodi.elizabeth (talk) 18:21, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mentorship

Sure Gil, I wil help you and Scott. Send your questions my way, and I will take a look at your sandbox. Cullen328 (talk) 00:03, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]