User talk:G4wa5r4gasag

This is G4wa5r4gasag's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rev. Clement C. Kubesh (July 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gusfriend was:

The text of this submission has been removed from Wikipedia. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning biographies of living persons; we cannot accept such articles if they are unsourced, or contain unverifiable information which is potentially defamatory. All articles about living persons must conform to our biographies of living persons policy. In order to permit the author of this submission to provide sources that may satisfy the policy, the text of the page is available in the history.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rev. Clement C. Kubesh and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gusfriend (talk) 00:14, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, G4wa5r4gasag! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Gusfriend (talk) 00:14, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, G4wa5r4gasag, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Congregation of Mary Immaculate Queen did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Introduction tutorial
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Help pages
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. Tacyarg (talk) 23:00, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Affiliation with entities or topics

Greetings, friend, and welcome to Wikipedia. Since joining recently you've focused on Traditionalist Catholicism with significant contributions. I'm curious whether you have any affiliation with entities such as the CMRI, a Catholic diocese or parish, religious order, or similar entity. Are you a volunteer, website manager, PR rep, spokesperson, or blogger for such an organization? Are you employed or paid or compensated in some way for your editing activities here on Wikipedia? Elizium23 (talk) 07:06, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Three notes

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made editsto User talk:Veverve while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you.

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on User talk:Veverve. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

(Please note in particular WP:BLPGROUP.)

-- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 21:30, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Tamzin: the user did personnal attacks again: Talk:Congregation of Mary Immaculate Queen#Veverve and Elizium23 are Trolling Catholic Pages. Veverve (talk) 22:00, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for making personal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 22:03, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Continued personnal attacks

@Tamzin: the user has continued attacking me and another user.

You've done a great job gutting the article to incoherent arbitrary snippets. Thankfully, you're helping to make wikipedia irrelevant, which will help people to find better sources elsewhere. [1]
Thankfully, wikipedia saves all these previous edits, so these can be posted on the web elsewhere, since there are some hostile editors who follow these Catholic pages (FSSP, CMRI, Schuckardt, etc.) [2]
Why do you edit all these pages? Who do you work for? You're not doing any research yourself, you just come onto pages to delete huge amounts of info, and you've been doing this for years. I've seen this Elizium23 name pop up on the FSSP page, you watch that thing like a hawk, deleting anything you don't like. [3]
My only guess is that you intentionally gut these articles down to nothing on purpose. [4]

Veverve (talk) 10:07, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the ping, Veverve. G4wa5r4gasag, I want to be ultra-clear about this: If you speculate about the motives of other editors again, I will revoke your editing privileges indefinitely. Comment on content, not contributors. You are, by the way, welcome to start another website. We encourage that! Just make sure to follow Wikipedia:Reusing Wikipedia content to make sure you don't violate any copyrights. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 14:04, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Rev. Clement C. Kubesh

Hello, G4wa5r4gasag. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rev. Clement C. Kubesh, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:00, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Rev. Clement C. Kubesh

Hello, G4wa5r4gasag. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Rev. Clement C. Kubesh".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:15, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]