User talk:FuzzyManBella

September 2022

Hello, I'm Iamreallygoodatcheckers. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Blake Masters, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Iamreallygoodatcheckers^t@lk 05:00, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Kari Lake. Thank you. 25stargeneral (talk) 21:23, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

Hello, I'm PerpetuityGrat. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Idaho Democratic Party have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. PerpetuityGrat (talk) 03:15, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ideology for state Dem parties

Hi there, I saw you practically went through a bunch of Democratic Party state affiliate pages and removed any mentions (included well sourced ones) of inner-state ideological factions. Not only did you not cite what "consensus" you're referencing, I couldn't find it on the Dem Party's talk page. I may be mistaken, but in my 5 years or so on Wikipedia I have never seen a guideline that warrants going through a ton of other pages for an alleged consensus on another page. Please link the consensus you are referring to if possible. Thanks. TheXuitts (talk) 10:15, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Election denial movement

I have restored the version before your last edit. Please install your edit again. Because the version is now different than when you made that edit, it may no longer be necessary to do it or may need to be tweaked before you do it. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 19:56, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Same sentence on multiple pages

I noticed you have added this same text to several pages in the last few minutes: "Trump's victory was attributed to overwhelming and underestimated support from white working class citizens in the state's rural areas, a demographic that had previously tended to either vote for the Democratic candidate, or did not vote at all. " It's important to provide a source for the information you include. As far as I can tell, you only did so on one page, and then copied it to other pages. Please find reliable sources! Thank you! FPTI (talk) 22:15, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]