User talk:Frutti xperiment

Welcome!

Hello, Frutti xperiment! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! -- irn (talk) 16:33, 4 November 2017 (UTC) Getting Started Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost) Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Your submission at Articles for creation: Christopher Udemezue (November 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Christopher Udemezue and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 06:24, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

Hello! Frutti xperiment, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 06:24, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Christopher Udemezue (November 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Christopher Udemezue and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 20:22, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Untitled (Bermuda Railway Trail), 2017, Cy Gavin.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Untitled (Bermuda Railway Trail), 2017, Cy Gavin.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:31, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jordan Casteel has been accepted

Jordan Casteel, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

KJP1 (talk) 07:11, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Frutti xperiment. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Shiv Kotecha for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shiv Kotecha is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shiv Kotecha until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Praxidicae (talk) 19:33, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:ChrisGarneau2.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:ChrisGarneau2.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 02:13, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

October 2020

Hello, I'm Balon Greyjoy. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Jordan Firstman seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Balon Greyjoy (talk) 17:11, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

Kaitlin Phillips moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Kaitlin Phillips, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GSS ^💬 14:36, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:51, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

November 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Torrey Peters. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:21, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Hi :) I just wanted to explain that I've restored the notability tag which I had placed there earlier and which you removed subsequently without really addressing the issue. This writer has three self-published novellas and one upcoming 'big name'-published novel. That wouldn't qualify them for notability as an author, so the notability hinges on WP:GNG, which requires significant coverage in multiple independent, reliable sources. IMO, none of the ones listed as references at the moment meet that criteria, and simply adding more of the same won't do the trick, you'll need a couple of solid ones to create at least the assumption of notability, until then the tag should remain in place. I hope that makes sense, but if you have any questions or comments on this, ping me back. Cheers, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:23, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Response to: DoubleGrazing

Hi! I added two additional hyperlinks to the section that mentions that the novel was published by Penguin Random House. PRH is one of the largest and most prestigious publishing companies in the world. The book was reviewed by Marie Claire (reputable) and Alma (so-so). There's a lot of detail in the THEM.us article referenced which goes into the nuances of why Torrey's novels do qualify her for notability as an important literary author; she will be one of the first transgender authors publishing fiction, non non-fiction, in the mainstream literary world. I might be jumping the gun here...but she will definitely have a lot of buzz and major press coming out over the next few months.

Speedy deletion nomination of Total Freedom (DJ)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Total Freedom (DJ) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ~ Chip🐺 19:02, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

Total Freedom (DJ) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Total Freedom (DJ), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Praxidicae (talk) 20:41, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Total Freedom (DJ) (December 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 4thfile4thrank was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Total Freedom (DJ) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Total Freedom (DJ), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

4thfile4thrank (talk) 00:47, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Torrey Peters (December 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Torrey Peters and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Torrey Peters, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 10:06, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hari Nef, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Abra.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Autofiction, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Cyrus Dunham, Elizabeth Hardwick and Chris Kraus.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Total Freedom (DJ) (December 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Total Freedom (DJ) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Total Freedom (DJ), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 17:46, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of David Velasco for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David Velasco is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Velasco (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

FalconK (talk) 01:59, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Blocked

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Frutti xperiment (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hi, NinjaRobotPirate blocked me as a “sockpuppet” in association with two other accounts that are perhaps paid editors or bots or trolls. I don’t fully understand why nor how someone might be using my IP address and how they are associated with my editing process. Would this mean my laptop or iPhone is hacked? It looks like this error happens from time to time on the petition for editor deletion page: “ Occasionally a user has the same IP address as a blocked user, and is shown a block message describing that other user's activity. If you receive a block notice not directed at your actions, you should ask for assistance calmly as described below and the matter will be investigated.” Mostly confused by this and seems a bit random and annoying. Is there a way to get this resolved? I’ve been an editor for about three years in my spare time reading about the art world and critics I admire, I generate pages for them out of good will (and late nights in bed). There wasn’t a lot of gay and queer figures to look up to on the web so I’ve made it my archiving mission to add some semi-important people online. Thanks for all and looking forward to getting this cleared up. Frutti xperiment (talk) 04:36, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 14:47, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Based on checkuser findings, this is  Possilikely (a mix between possible and likely). Note that the block is not a checkuser-block, though. --Yamla (talk) 12:16, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

Based on the editing history, and the topics this editor has worked on, it seems rather implausible that they have been editing as a sock. Their edits don't overlap with Sillyspice and Smalltownsquirrel and they have not worked on tiktok "stars" and fitness companies. I've seen them around and never had any doubts that they were editing in good faith. Vexations (talk) 12:56, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi All,NinjaRobotPirate, Vexations, and Yamla - I'm still looking for my account to be unblocked. Again, it looks like NinjaRobotPirate mistakenly blocked my account in connection to several other accounts that were either using my IP address. Again, this is the only account I have on Wikipedia and I can verify my identity or any additional proof you need to complete this process. Hoping to clear this up asap! Thanks all.

Frutti_xperiment I am not an administrator, so I cannot unblock you. My understanding is that your unblock appeal is currently pending. It is listed at Category:Requests_for_unblock. The only thing I can do at this point is point out to reviewing admins that we don't know each other, but I have encountered your contributions as part of my work at WP:NPP, and that your edit history has convinced me that you are editing in good faith. I also like to think I understand the editing patterns of undisclosed paid editors. I was going to talk to you about one of your recent contributions, Draft:Nash Glynn, and contribute something to an article for deletion discussion of an article you created, David Velasco. I have some domain knowledge of the topics you edit on. I was hoping you'd not be discouraged despite some setbacks. I'll keep an eye out, and hope this gets resolved soon. All the best, Vexations (talk) 14:07, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi Vexations, thanks for the good faith support and vouching against the block. I appreciate your support! Additionally, I'm open to discussing best-of practices and any advice specifically for the pages I generate for "emerging" artists and writers. The emerging aspect of the writers and artists I make pages for can be a bit tricky since their notoriety is occurring "in real time" and often queer/gay figures are more notable within their own queer/gay worlds before they are featured in say more mainstream publications and institutions. Maybe I'm approaching this wrong and should be creating Stubs or Drafts instead (such would be the case for Torrey Peters and Nash Glynn, although I've updated Torrey's page with some major book reviews, features, and Top 10 Picks from major secondary sources over the past few weeks). Hope to talk soon and thanks again for your support thus far! My Best, frutti_xperiment

Hi NinjaRobotPirate and Ezlev,

I am following up with my appeal to be unblocked. I was mistakenly, randomly, or unfairly accused of sockpuppetting. I have confirmed that I only have one account. I have confirmed where I have made previous errors for publishing pages before turning them into Drafts or Stubs with the help of Vexations. Can you confirm next steps? Do I continue waiting until an Admin reviews the case? Let me know what else I can do so I can return to volunteering. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Frutti_xperiment (talk • contribs) 17:59, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi Frutti_xperiment I'm afraid there is a rather long list of unblock requests at Category:Requests_for_unblock. It might take a while. My advice is to remain patient, and perhaps review some of the policies and guidelines an unblocking admin may ask you about. It helps if you can show a good understanding of our verifiability, copyright and conflict of interest policies for example. All the best, Vexations (talk) 20:10, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Torrey Peters has been accepted

Torrey Peters, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

warmly, ezlev. talk 19:04, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Frutti xperiment, this article is nicely put together and it made me aware of a book I might want to read, so thank you! Good luck with your unblock request. warmly, ezlev. talk 19:11, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Frutti xperiment (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Dear Community, I am requesting for my account Fruttixperiment attached be unblocked. I have reviewed the guidelines for requesting my account to be unblocked. Of the three reasons for requesting an unblock, the last is the reason for my request: My "IP address is not connected in any way with the block" which was initially for Smalltownsquirrel made by NinjaRobotPirate and reinforced without due reason by Yamla.

• that the block was not necessary to prevent damage or disruption (i.e., that the block violates our blocking policy); or:
• that the block is no longer necessary because you understand what you are blocked for, you will not do it again, and you will make productive contributions instead; or:
• that your conduct (under any account or IP address) is not connected in any way with the block (this can happen if a block is aimed at resolving a separate situation and you are unintentionally blocked as a result because you use the same IP range).

My reason for requesting an unblock is because the original block was not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia as I am not attached to the two listed sock puppet accounts. In addition, the block is no longer necessary because I understand what I have been blocked for and I will not cause damage or disruption, and will make continue useful contributions instead. Vexations has pointed out pages that needed additional citations or featured not-yet notable figures in art history.

Decline reason:

• You need to stop creating new accounts, right now.

The following accounts are  Confirmed to this one, and are evading this block:

• ThomasThicketty (talk · contribs)
• SQLSquared (talk · contribs)
• GeorgeBushGlenClose (talk · contribs)
• Narrativeeconomics (talk · contribs)

You will not be unblocked while you continue to make new accounts. SQL^{Query me!} 04:51, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• What can you tell me about the account Readingfortheplot (talk · contribs) ? SQL^{Query me!} 18:47, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi User:SQL, I created the Readingfortheplot account since my previous account had been blocked for three plus months and I have yet to receive a verdict on my appeal. I have provided evidence and have been vouched for that Frutti xperiment had zero connection to Smalltownsquirrel under the allegations made by NinjaRobotPirate and reinforced without due reason by Yamla.

Is there anything I can do to appeal and have my account reviewed? I will send another request below.

Dear Community, I am writing three months after my first block. I am hoping for a decision as to the status of my account. My account was unfairly blocked in connection to two other accounts that I had no connection to and I am requesting for my account Fruttixperiment be unblocked. I have reviewed the guidelines for requesting my account to be unblocked. Of the three reasons for requesting an unblock, the last is the reason for my request:

My "IP address is not connected in any way with the block" which was initially for Smalltownsquirrel made by NinjaRobotPirate and reinforced without due reason by Yamla. To review:

• that the block was not necessary to prevent damage or disruption (i.e., that the block violates our blocking policy); or:
• that the block is no longer necessary because you understand what you are blocked for, you will not do it again, and you will make productive contributions instead; or:
• that your conduct (under any account or IP address) is not connected in any way with the block (this can happen if a block is aimed at resolving a separate situation and you are unintentionally blocked as a result because you use the same IP range).

My reason for requesting an unblock is because the original block was not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia as I am not attached to the two listed sock puppet accounts. Vexations has pointed out pages that needed additional citations or featured not-yet notable figures in art history. I understand that there is a fine line between emerging artists and writers and yet-to-be mainstream artists and writers and I will due my diligence moving forward to be more careful.|idletimestamp=20210511210022 }}

You were not waiting. Your unblock request was declined, you had no open unblock request. As you continued to set up illicit accounts to evade your block, you have all but proven you have no intention of following our policies, policies you knew perfectly well. Given your bad behaviour, this is probably the end of the line for you here. Your best hope, though it is slim, is to follow WP:SO. This requires six months with zero edits. No more sockpuppetry. No more edits. At that point, apply for an unblock. I will not comment further, do not ping me again. --Yamla (talk) 10:19, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

Dear Community, I am writing to accept Yamla request for my 6 month block. Yamla and NinjaRobotPirate were unable to uncover any evidence connecting me to the original block, however, I have come clean about the following sock puppet accounts, which I do understand is bad faith. I am still unclear as to how my original block had anything to do with the other sock puppet accounts since my IP address has no connection to those accounts, the pages I edit have no connection to those accounts, and the original admin who blocked my account has yet to deliver or come clean as to their reason for the original block. I apologize to the community for creating pages for artists and writers that are underrepresented and are at the brink for their notability. This can make pages appear as they are either written as press releases or sometimes not-so-notable. As you can see with the page I made for writer Torrey Peters, I was about one month too early writing her page. She received acclaimed press, award nominations, and more one month AFTER I wrote her page and I should have waited until then to do so. I hope that this is a warning for those who are trying to change the world and make the internet a better place that represents all walks of life, artists, and such. There are admins who appear to be blocking users without justified reasons or evidence, even after other blocked users have vouched for their blind (in my case, ignorant) good faith. I will wait "the six months with zero edits. No more sockpuppetry. No more edits," and hope for the best.

Concern regarding Draft:Nash Glynn

Hello, Frutti xperiment. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nash Glynn, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:03, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Total Freedom (DJ)

Hello, Frutti xperiment. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Total Freedom (DJ), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:02, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Kaitlin Phillips

Hello, Frutti xperiment. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kaitlin Phillips".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:10, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Ty Mitchell for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ty Mitchell is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ty Mitchell until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 (talk) 09:27, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kay Gabriel

The article Kay Gabriel has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet notability guidelines of WP:POET

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 17:52, 28 June 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Tobi Haslett

The article Tobi Haslett has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The author in question does not seem, for the time being, to be notable enough to have their own encyclopedia entry. No sources seem to be independent from the author’s publications. As such, the entry reads as a summary of a few magazine publications by the author.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 10 October 2024 (UTC)