User talk:Fredsagirl

Regarding your edit to Royal Rife:

Your recent edit to Royal Rife (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. You have been identified as a new user editing a page that experiences malicious edits by banned users that continue to edit via shared IP ranges or open proxies. Since these ranges are too large (collateral damage) to be blocked and user's IP addresses are not visible, edits to this page by logged-out editors of server or shared IP ranges and new users are reverted. The changes can be reviewed and restored by established users. // VoABot II 05:28, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

At what point do I cease to be a new "vandal-prone" user? These were solid edits to neutralize highly biased phraseology on this article. Can someone please revert my edits, and let me know how long I'm on probation? Fredsagirl 03:08, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You are right that those probably should not have been auto-reverted. The place to bring up these edits is on the [Talk|Royal Rife|Royal Rife talk page]]. --Selket ^Talk 03:16, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Fredsagirl, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! AvB ÷ talk 23:07, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bot question on my talk page

I'll try and pen a reply at Talk:Royal_Rife. AvB ÷ talk 12:18, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edits to Royal Rife

Hello. I reverted your recent-ish edits to the Royal Rife page. As you will see if you read the talk section, there has been exhaustive discussion over to what extent current advances can be compared or related to Rife's claims. The article, in its current state, represents the consensus version after those discussions. If you want to restore your changes, please discuss on the talk page.

Thanks, Angio (talk) 18:59, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]