User talk:Frater5

; Archives
	2006 (May); ; 2006 (November); ; ;

Welcome to my talk page!

You are invited to leave me messages and corrections.
Please, be polite and assume good intent.

If I do not respond to your message or I delete it, it is probably because you violated one or both these rules. Otherwise, let 'er rip!

The Glyph

Hi, I'm very new at this, and i'm not too positive if i'm posting this the right way. Anyways, in your own words, let 'er rip. I visited your userpage, and admired that you enjoy psychology, as do I.

I'm very young, but curious to your contribution of the "alchemical glyph" on the protoscience of alchemy. Mainly, my real question is, what is your position on the myth of "Alchemy"?. I would love to hear your insight. It doesn't make sense how something so intricate could just be a dreamer's dream. Something with so much air about it can not be just tossed aside as unreal. -Jean

I think the most fascinating thing in psychology is the humans mind to become infatuated when gaining knowledge. We tend to think the answer we have is "the universal answer". For instance, in the middle ages when the Earth was presumed to be flat or when it was considered foolish to suggest the moon was actually covered with craters.

A modern example of a universal answer is the theory of the big bang. By the way, feel free to correct me anywhere. Be tedious=]

If you are interested in Wikipedia, a good first step is to create an account. In that way, I could reply to you on your own userpage.

Regarding alchemy, I'm not exactly sure what it is you'd like to know. I can't claim any unique insight since I'm not a scholar or practitioner of alchemy. I can say that I admire it for the essential concept that it is possible to undergo internal change that can allow one to become more connected to the spiritual nature of the universe. This is a profound way of thinking and quite against the orthodox church, which insists that salvation is only possible via faith and external "good works". Do I think there's actually something to the complexity of the system itself? Frankly, no. The human mind is an incredible thing, and with enough passion and intelligence, it is possible to create an amazingly complex system, even when it isn't based on a single thing other than imagination. This doesn't mean that the system is necessarily useless...spiritual transformation merely requires intent and consistent effort, and almost any system working towards this end will do, alchemy included.

You are right that humans are intrinsically obsessed with "knowing the answers". The Big Bang might not quite square with believing in a flat earth...the physical evidence for it is compelling. But it does compare in that we are always curious about the way things are, how they work, and what we can do with them. This is why Wikipedia is as huge as it is...people love to know! —Frater5 17:47, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Turning Tide

I've been a practicing Thelemite for a year now, but am deeply concerned with the fascist policies of the US, and indeed governments around the globe. Do you think the tide will be turning soon, and how do you think all of this fits into the "Aeon of Horus" and so forth? --72.226.218.165 02:03, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, that's a big question. I am not much of a prognosticator, so I can't really say what will happen with any given government. My general opinion is that the meta-direction of humanity, viewed at the scale of centuries (and even decades), shows a steady increase towards individual freedom. With this inevitable movement comes the equally inevitable reaction. The War of the Aeon is not against governments per se, but against Old Aeon beliefs and values from which spring oppression and tyranny. Personally, I believe that the recent election of the numerous progressives this midterm is a sign that people are waking up from the neoconservative dream...while no political party is perfect, they are a definite movement back towards sanity after the nightmare of the GOP-ruled congress. I'm not sure if this is the answer you are looking for, but in these regards I'm certainly no wiser than yourself. –Frater5 (talk/con) 04:02, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Clinical Psych Phrase

Hi,

I wanted to touch base with you and apologize if my tone has been too harsh. I feel strongly about this issue, but I don't mean to offend anyone who is editing with good intent and I do think that is what you have been doing.

When I came to your User page to leave that message I saw you are a fan of Positive Psychology - me too. What a breath of fresh air after decades of DSM classifications and mysterious diagnosis arising from strange theoretical orientations ("I wanted to WHAT with my mother?"). I had the opportunity to assist Nathaniel Branden twice a week for over a year back in early 90's when he ran two groups based solely on developing positives. I wouldn't have missed that for anything. Branden knew Fritz Perlz and was fond of many of his therapuetic techniques (but not so much the underlying theories). Steve 22:24, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate your kind comments and the smile. While you have seemed aggressive, I wouldn't say harshly so. In cases like this, it is usually possible to find a good solution. If I were you, I'd start a section on the talk page with your perspective and an invitation for suggestions. I'm a reasonable guy, but others aren't, and you are treading on an area of practice that the field has been working very hard to protect. Because of this, you will fare much better, I believe, with an invitational stance, rather than a provocative one.

Re: Positive Psychology...I am indeed a big fan. I am in the camp that thinks that PosPsy shouldn't try to develop as an independent orientation of practice, but should infuse itself within existing practice models. I believe that as it does, it will begin to chip away at the pathology-model of mental health. Even at CIIS, which is a progressive school, I still hear wacky psychoanalytic theories taken seriously. Hopefully, the data will eventually be so overwhelming that psychologists will have to jettison past-oriented insight-focused therapies, especially those built upon Freud's fictional drive theory. I just don't understand how any educated therapist can take any of that as sound science...it boggles my mind.

I agree that it would be a mistake to try to make PosPsy into it's own orientation. It is more fundamental - like something that arises out of a good theory of human nature. The ability to define pathology and treat it is a good thing - the big mistake was seeing humans as ONLY pathology and never recognizing that one could work on positives. Amazing that it took so many decades! I've found valuable things in almost every theoretical orientation, even Freud (I like his and his daughter's list of defenses - but I don't agree with the structure, theory or the ineffectual treatment techniques). The funny thing is that the DSM will end being a great help by giving a common agreement between orientations. They disagree on cause and on treatment, but are forced to see the similarities in symptom sets. That means the research data will force people to chuck technologies that don't work and to question theories that contradict the data. Those orientations that can't or won't integrate PosPsy will loose credibility and support. Rational, intelligent orientations will take to it like a duck to water. Steve 04:37, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Anyway, thanks for the kind comment. That's doing wiki right. –Frater5 (talk/con) 03:58, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Steve has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile at others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing!

Smile

Michael has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing!

Religious symbols

Your enthusiasm in the religious symbols area is commendable, but you should have directed your efforts more towards Wikimedia Commons than English Wikipedia since WP:NOT says that "Wikipedia is not a mirror or a repository of links, images, or media files" (which means that your Gallery of religious symbols is much more appropriate to be merged into the existing Commons gallery Commons:Religious symbols than to be a separate Wikipedia article, as I already said on its talk page), and the symbols themselves which you have uploaded are highly appropriate to be uploaded to Commons (since they are under free licenses, and not dependent on English-language text).

Also, many of your SVG files have a huge "Polka Dot Pattern" embedded within them which adds absolutely no functionality to those files. (See how I just now reduced Image:Ichthus2.svg from 97,391 bytes to 1,021 bytes!) AnonMoos 18:30, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's weird about the morey pattern...I don't see it on my computer. I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong...

In the next few days I will upload some of my original images to Commons, which I agree I should have done in the first place.

–Frater5 (talk/con) 02:48, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The pattern wasn't used in your file -- it didn't affect the image display, it just bloated your files with 95k of useless data. The article is now nominated for deletion (not by me), as I knew it eventually would be: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gallery of religious symbols -- AnonMoos 22:31, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Frater5, I came across the Basmala drawing Image:Bismillah.svg. I plan to use it in the front page of my PhD thesis. Therefore, I would like to know if I can use it without attribution? Best Regards, Mohamed Bamakhrama (talk) 22:12, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Gakyil / gankyil image

Thank you very much for uploading an image on the phurba page, i was wondering if you may be able to progress some images for gankyil and namkha?
Blessings
B9 hummingbird hovering^{(talk • contribs)} 13:35, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Furry

Looking for something to do? WikiProject Furry is improving articles on furry and anthropomorphic topics, and we'd like to have you on board.

Our current goal is to raise Anthrocon, furry convention and furry fandom to good article status and beyond - but if that doesn't take your fancy, there are plenty of other articles to work on. Give it a go and let us know how you're doing!

You received this one-time invitation because you are a Furry Wikipedian. GreenReaper 22:44, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Safia Aoude

In order to defeat the "deletionists" would you be prepared to keep Safia Aoude's article?Phase4 11:01, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Little essays.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Little essays.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:04, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:AL cover.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:AL cover.gif. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 19:02, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Bookoflies(crowley).jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bookoflies(crowley).jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 11:16, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Bookofthoth.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bookofthoth.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 11:17, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hamsa

I'd like to use your Hamsa picture as a custom skin on my iPhone (from either skinit.com or uniqueskins.com), and have two questions. Can I have permission to use it? And do you have a larger version of it? Thanks, PÆonU (talk) 19:29, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate Image:Sriyantra 175px.gif

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Sriyantra 175px.gif, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Sriyantra 175px.gif is a duplicate of an already existing article, category or image.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Sriyantra 175px.gif, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 00:43, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:93user.gif listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:93user.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. O sama K^{Reply? on my talk page, please} 19:24, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

Well here is another one :)

		The Excellent Userpage Award
		Here is a barnstar for introducing this amazing barnstar. You have an excellent userpage as well. Keep up the good work Juthani1 ^tcs 23:56, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Unicursal user.gif listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Unicursal user.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:13, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Unicursal tiny.gif listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Unicursal tiny.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:14, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:GradHat(sm).gif listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:GradHat(sm).gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 08:33, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sriyantra175.gif listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sriyantra175.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 08:07, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar!

		The Excellent Userpage Award
		I award you this barnstar for a fantastic User Page! Keep up the good work! manadude2 (talk) 19:49, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar "Excellent Userpage Award"

Hello Frater5. I write to you, because of a matter of delicacy. I'm quite a new user and a couple of days ago, I designed a Barnstar to honor an Excellent User and User discussion page. I inserted this Barnstar on the Wikipedia:Barnstars page, but it was deleted, because it was someones opinion, that my Barnstar is too close to yours. This person suggested that I shall propose my Barnstar as a replacement for the current Excellent User Page BStar, but I shy away to do so before I talk to you. Would you mind, if I promote my Barnstar to see if it finds the approval of other users? I hope you are not too angry because of my request. With kind regards --Rectilinium'♥' 08:22, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've noted that you are not active anymore. Anyway, if you ever return to Wikipedia, I'ld like to inform you, that your Barnstar still is in use. My Barnstar was selected as the new Graphic Designer Barnstar. With kind regards --Rectilinium'♥' 16:47, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

your design for unicursal hexagram

I don't mean to be presumptive, but I really enjoyed your design of the unicursal hexagram, and was curious if I could use it as a tattoo or basis for a tattoo? Thank you for the consideration! Stefei (talk) 07:59, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:93small

Template:93small has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:08, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar Award

		The Creator of the Barnstar
		Hi Frater5. For creating the 'Excellent User Page Award' barnstar I award you this creator's barnstar in recognition of your work. Hope you come back one day. Thanks! Antarctic-adventurer (talk) 00:00, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Goetia.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Goetia.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:40, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Holybooks sm.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Holybooks sm.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:49, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Konxompax.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Konxompax.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 14:43, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Rosycross.svg

Thank you for uploading File:Rosycross.svg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:58, 15 February 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 00:58, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Source of File:Bumpa.svg

Hi Frater
I really love the pictures of bum-pa and rin-chen-gdugs . I would like to have the complete set of the 8 Ashtamangala in the same style. Do you have all the eight symbols as pixel images? Since you are probably busy doing other stuff at this time, I could do a substantial part of the vectorization. It would be awesome, if you could upload the pixel images! =)
Yours, Saippuakauppias ⇄ 23:10, 22 March 2011 (UTC) (Please post a note to my user page. - Thank you!)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Crowleybooks

Template:Crowleybooks has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. — This, that, and the other (talk) 01:49, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Vajra.png

Thank you for uploading File:Vajra.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 04:14, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thank you for the image http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Menorah.svg which you made. I used an image based on it (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Hanukiah.svg) for a menorah app I wrote for the iphone/ipad available for free at http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/hanukkah-menorah/id487160676.

Thank you, --Jon — Preceding unsigned comment added by Appstudio (talk • contribs) 10:56, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:AL cover.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:AL cover.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:44, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Thothdeckcover.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Thothdeckcover.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:14, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Gallery of religious symbols listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Gallery of religious symbols. Since you had some involvement with the Gallery of religious symbols redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 12:14, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Gallery of religious symbols listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Gallery of religious symbols. Since you had some involvement with the Gallery of religious symbols redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 10:32, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Circletriangle.gif

Thank you for uploading File:Circletriangle.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:59, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Circletriangle.gif missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

File:Circletriangle.gif

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 16:01, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Thelemapeerreview

Template:Thelemapeerreview has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Magioladitis (talk) 00:48, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Alchemical Symbol : Squared Circle

Can you provide me some information related to the alchemical symbol 'Squared Circle' : http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/File:Squaredcircle.svg

What's the source? Where did you get to know about this symbol? Any references?

This symbol is very similar (almost same) to the diagram described in the bashar session 'Resonance Reflection'. (http://www.bashar.org/)

Frd911 (talk) 07:05, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Thelema stubs has been nominated for discussion

Category:Thelema stubs, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Dawynn (talk) 18:49, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Konxompax.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Konxompax.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:00, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Unicursalhexagram50px.gif

The file File:Unicursalhexagram50px.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Konxompax.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Konxompax.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 23:12, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Diaryofadrugfiend.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Diaryofadrugfiend.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:49, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]