User talk:Fou. Nobody

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Hello, Fou. Nobody, and welcome to Wikipedia!

An edit that you recently made to An Essay Concerning Human Understanding seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox.

Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Introduction and Getting started
Contributing to Wikipedia
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Drmies (talk) 13:50, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't include your own personal observations in encyclopedic articles. In addition, the content wasn't relevant to the article, and should have been more carefully proofread for grammar and mechanicals. Drmies (talk) 13:51, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Drmies Hello.

This was my first edition. My second edition has a link to John Locke's theory of innate knowledge that covers natural philosophy to design the dialectical relations of this author to other modern philosophers.

It was my mistake that they are not made at once.

Thank you for your response. Fou. Nobody (talk) 13:59, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, but the response doesn't really alleviate my concerns, particularly from an English-language point of view. And I don't know about links: content here need to be verified by reliable secondary sources. Drmies (talk) 14:00, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Drmies I might ask you to have my writing back for revision if it is in your authority. Fou. Nobody (talk) 14:02, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but that's my day job already. I'm thinking you'd be better off writing for the Wikipedia of your first language. Drmies (talk) 14:03, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Drmies Fine. Good day to you. Fou. Nobody (talk) 14:05, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing. --VViking_TalkEdits 17:00, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Viewmont Viking the sources are from the original book. May you refer me to any link that is poorly sourced or unsourced from the subject? Fou. Nobody (talk) 17:03, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You wrote: "By considering the physical and metaphysical relationships, perhaps Schopenhauer's contradistinctions about Space, Time, and Matter, are known by following natural design for the mental conclusion of mind and practical ground, in its fundamental representation." That's not correct English, and it's original research, meaning this is your interpretation (I suppose--hard to read) of what you found in Schopenhauer. See WP:SYNTH. Drmies (talk) 17:27, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Drmies is it better? Fou. Nobody (talk) 17:30, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]