User talk:Fir0002/Archive 6

Merry Christmas

Hello! I wish you a Merry Christmas and all the best in the new year. - Darwinek (talk) 16:50, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:Champ de Mars from the Eiffel Tower - July 2006.jpg

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted

Your nomination for featured picture status, Image:Champ de Mars from the Eiffel Tower - July 2006 edit.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. MER-C 02:35, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas

From Muhammad Mahdi Karim (talk) 10:17, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you object to the above message, please remove it, accept my apologies and notify me on my talk page.

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:Alter Strom.jpg

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted

Your nomination for featured picture status, Image:Alter Strom.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. MER-C 03:19, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Fir,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:Alter Strom.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on May 2, 2008. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2008-05-02. howcheng {chat} 05:07, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:Calidris-alpina-001 edit.jpg

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted

Your nomination for featured picture status, Image:Calidris-alpina-001 edit.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Chris.B (talk) 09:52, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Fir,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:Calidris-alpina-001 edit.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on June 8, 2008. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2008-06-08. howcheng {chat} 22:43, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Great Picture

Thank you for this nice picture! It´s absolutely great!!!

Greetings --84.149.113.160 (talk) 19:16, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:USA 10096-7-8 HDR Antelope Canyon Luca Galuzzi 2007.jpg

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted

Your nomination for featured picture status, Image:USA 10096-7-8 HDR Antelope Canyon Luca Galuzzi 2007.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. MER-C 04:56, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Fir,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:USA 10096-7-8 HDR Antelope Canyon Luca Galuzzi 2007.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on May 4, 2008. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2008-05-04. howcheng {chat} 23:55, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Various featured picture candidacies

An image uploaded by you has been promoted to featured picture status

Your image, Image:Common brown robberfly with prey.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! MER-C 02:24, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Peter,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:Common brown robberfly with prey.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on June 14, 2008. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2008-06-14. howcheng {chat} 04:51, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An image uploaded by you has been promoted to featured picture status

Your image, Image:Australian painted lady feeding.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! MER-C 02:24, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An image uploaded by you has been promoted to featured picture status

Your image, Image:Tau Emerald inflight edit.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! MER-C 02:24, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Fir,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:Tau Emerald inflight edit.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on July 2, 2008. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2008-07-02. howcheng {chat} 04:32, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations

The 1000th FP was Image:Tau Emerald inflight edit.jpg. Congratulations! MER-C 02:24, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations from me too. If Wikipedia were ever to have an official photographer, I think it ought to be you.--86.149.48.8 (talk) 10:04, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks :-) --Fir0002 07:09, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Doctorates

Wiki Doctorate is a new scheme designed to recognise the people who "do all the work" on Wikipedia. It has been mainly developed for Wikipedia administrators however if you have done lots to keep Wikipedia on "the straight and narrow", including being members of different groups which help Wikipedia i.e "The Welcoming Committee. We have selected to email you because you can apply for the doctorate and we would be very grateful if you did and put the userbox on your user page to boost advertising. The following link will take you straight to our homepage.

Yours sincerely

--Dr.J.Wright MD (talk) 23:57, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Two things...

First, let me know if the edit solves the color cast problems in the Swan Head FPC.

Second, and more importantly, I am seeking your valuable knowledge about iStockphoto.com. I have been considering getting an account there and attempting to make some supplemental, not work intensive, income. Before doing this however, I wanted to get an idea about what the income opportunity is. So, I figured I'd ask the resident iStockphoto seller about how much do you clear a month from your stock and how many and what kinds of pictures you have on there. Obviously if you feel uncomfortable telling me about what you are making from iStock, feel free to leave me an angry message on my talk page. Thanks -Fcb981^{(talk:contribs)} 01:27, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey could I ask a favor

Heya Fir002 could you please use your photo software to try and make this picture sharper and possibly Featured. I ask because I know your the photo genius, could you also please post it as Edit 1 on the featured picture candidates page. Thanks --82.36.182.217 (talk) 20:39, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bearded Dragon

Hey Fir,

I have an Eastern Bearded Dragon shot that's pretty good and I would like to put up at FPC in the near future. Do you mind if I shunt your current image out of the Infobox for the purpose? (And I think someone's stealing my idea!). --jjron (talk) 08:13, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yours are good in that they show the full beast; mine may do them on 'wow', but I may also be biased. Perhaps we can let the FPC crowd decide - if mine does better at FPC than yours, then it keeps the infobox, otherwise yours (or one of your new ones if you intend to nominate them) can go back in. OK, I better get it uploaded and nominated - will wait for Broken Hill to make its way off the page first. Yep, better put some words down on that idea, see if it gets any response. --jjron (talk) 11:43, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thank you very much for the downsample and sharpen on the petri dishes at FPC. :) Durova^Charge! 02:57, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

POTD notification

Hi Fir,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:Drone flies mating.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on January 13, 2008. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2008-01-13. howcheng {chat} 18:07, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FPC

Hi, I realize there have been a lot of older photos on FPC lately and I'd like to explain my share of that. I've reviewed nearly 100,000 public domain images with an eye toward bringing more attention to the best encyclopedic ones among them, particularly those with historic value. Fewer than 1 in 1000 is even worth a second look and far fewer than that get to PPR or FPC (often after quite a while in Photoshop fixing dust and scratch marks two and three pixels wide). FP guidelines specifically allow editors to make some accommodations for balancing historic value against technical quality at FPC. I want you to know that I endeavor to make each of my nominations the very best scan and representation available of its kind. My workshop is at User:Durova/Landmark images if the idea interests you. Durova^Charge! 03:10, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

melbourne meetup

Hi there, Just thought I'd let you know there's a melbourne meetup (you're near Melb. aren't you?) coming up. I'll be there. Wikipedia:Meetup/Melbourne_9

Best, Witty Lama 23:24, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nah I'm not in Melbourne (yet!) and not sure if I'll be able to make it. Thanks for bringing it to my attention tho --Fir0002 09:34, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Remebrance poppy ww2 section of Aust war memorial.jpg

Thank you for your contributions, however your image Image:Remebrance poppy ww2 section of Aust war memorial.jpg has been thought of as really super awesome. Keep up the good work. Jecowa (talk) 05:31, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ah thanks a lot for the compliment! :-) --Fir0002 08:55, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Mary of Teck

An image edited by you has been promoted to featured picture status Your edit, Image:Queenmaryformalportrait edit3.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! jjron (talk) 08:22, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good on ya. ;-) --jjron (talk) 08:28, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

hehe well it was an editing challenge! --Fir0002 08:59, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Help with a pano

Fir, I was hoping that you would be kind enough to help me out with a panoramic image that I have been laboring over for quite some time. There is some distortion towards the edges and I just don't have software capable of correcting it. I would be very happy if you can help me out. Image:SeattleWaterfrontPano.jpg Thanks,, Cacophony (talk) 07:43, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I put the original images on Commons here: 1,2,3,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16. Thanks, Cacophony (talk) 03:48, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:2007 swifts creek lawnmower races04.jpg

An image uploaded by you has been promoted to featured picture status

Your image, Image:2007 swifts creek lawnmower races04 edit.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! jjron (talk) 09:19, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is more like it! --jjron (talk) 09:19, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Fir,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:2007 swifts creek lawnmower races04 edit.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on May 24, 2008. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2008-05-24. howcheng {chat} 17:45, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, this has been rescheduled to Template:POTD/2008-05-27. howcheng {chat} 16:30, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cake question

This is kind of silly, but I ran across your image here and I'm intrigued by the cake itself. I have to tell you, I've never seen peaches and chocolate on/in the same cake. So I'm curious: Do you know what kind of cake it was? Just chocolate and the peaches are used as a garnish, or did it have peaches inside also? Or was it the other way 'round, a different sort of cake and it just happens to have chocolate on the outside?

I appreciate your help, and I'm also very impressed with your photography. I love photography and I mess around with it some, but I'm not nearly as good at it as you are. Keep up the good work. -- edi (talk) 22:19, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Horse racing

Hey Fir,

Came across this. All seems to be OK as far the image being in articles, archives, etc, but the 'new' one is lacking the FP tag. Can you check it out and see if it seems OK, and if so add in the FP tag or let me know. --jjron (talk) 11:14, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed, was a duplicate image with a typo in the title. MER-C 11:16, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Cuzco

An image edited by you has been promoted to featured picture status Your edit, Image:Cuzco-Pano edit.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! jjron (talk) 16:39, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

POTD notification

Hi Fir,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:Motorbike rider mono.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on January 27, 2008. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2008-01-27. howcheng {chat} 17:54, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:Restless flycatcher02.jpg

An image uploaded by you has been promoted to featured picture status

Your image, Image:Restless flycatcher04.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! MER-C 04:08, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Fir,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:Restless flycatcher04.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on June 26, 2008. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2008-06-26. howcheng {chat} 04:15, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Maaaaaaate

You are, frankly, ridiculously skilled.
As an aspiring photographer currently entering Year 12 on the Central Coast, NSW, having competition like you in the world scares the living hell out of me.

Anyway, my purpose for coming here was just to give you the courtesy of informing you that I nominated "Dawn vignetting effect..." for FP... But, I guess you are getting accustomed to that.

Well, Godspeed.

TheDefiniteArticle (talk) 11:10, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Follow Up

Shit. I knew I'd forgotten something.
Oh well. Lucky you caught it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by TheDefiniteArticle (talk • contribs) 13:10, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Sunset with funnel clouds.jpg

Hi, Peter,
Sorry to bother you with this, but I'm very sure that the clouds in this absolutely remarkable Image are not funnel clouds. IMO they are Cirrus clouds. I might be mistaking on this, but I'm sure these are not funnel clouds. May I please ask you to consider the changing of the description of the image and Sunset article, where the image is displayed in the gallery. Thank you for your time.--Mbz1 (talk) 17:24, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the response. I've changed the description to this: "Dramatic sunset with the unusual clouds". May I please ask you to let me know, if you do not like the description and I'll change it again. Thank you.--Mbz1 (talk) 14:27, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:A day panorama - digital art.jpg

I really really really loved this image. I just wrote about it where I nominated it for Commons QI and the discussion of it at enFPC was one of the funnier things I have read recently.

I am here with a purpose which is not to a kiss photographers ass, believe it or not. I was wondering if you could detail the things you did to take the photograph on its talk page. I understand that there are guild like secrets involved and things like that; it is so very cool though -- and after too many decades which are made of years which are made of days, seeing a different yet mostly honest photographic representation of one of these was very very nice. My signature doesn't contain a link to my talk page here, I was having some problems with a princess and her 3 not 7 dwarves. User_talk:CarolSpears -- carol 16:11, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the comments Carol and yeah I agree that the discussion on en:FPC has been a bit dodgy - particularly the comment regardin the sharpness! Anway here's a few specifics regarding the creation of the pic. I'd been thinking about the idea for a while and decided that winter would be my best bet for the reason a few reasons. 1) The sun was at it's lowest so I was hoping to get a few more suns in the frames. 2) The sun set and rose at points not obstructed by the edges of the verandah. 3) The shorter day meant I didn't need to take as many exposures (although I guess that could have been overcome by using different intervals) and I wouldn't have to get up so early! So June was a good time to do it. I'm lucky in that the view here is what I get off the front verandah so finding a suitable scene to do the composite was pretty easy. The verandah also was very useful in providing a flat surface to place the tripod and allowed me to tie it to the railings to make sure it didn't get moved around much. I then levelled the two planes on my

tripod so it was completely flat. I don't have a fancy head with the degrees marked in so the verandah was handy in defining the edges - the panorama is slightly over 180 degrees (our verandah has a little bit jutting out) and cropped just outside of the frame on the left and right is where the verandah edge would be. I took the full panorama once every two (or it might have been three) hours after dawn - that would provide enough difference between each pano without making it too much of a pain to combine. Exposure wise I went for what the AE said for the sky in the section of sky I expected the pano to show through in the final result (so for the dawn shot I exposed for the sunrise and not on the much darker centre eucalypt tree) for obvious reasons. Although to give it extra feeling I deliberately underexposed the sunset (to show it's the ending/darkening of the day) and slightly overexposed the dawn for the obverse reason. I guess you didn't really need to take the full pano for each time of day, but I felt it would be good to have the full range to play with. After taking and stitching the panos in Panorama Maker 4.2 I blended them in Photoshop. The blending as you'd expect was very much a manual and labourious process - it wasn't a simple matter of splitting it into equal sections and deleting with feather as I originally though. I can't remember the exact technique/tools used but it involved work with the large feathered eraser and a feathered polygonal tool, alignment by making layers semi-transparent and warping/repositioning (my stitcher didn't stitch each pano exactly alike unfortunately). And yeah I guess that's pretty much it unless you've got any other specific queries about the process. You might also want to leave a message on Diliff's talkpage - he said a while ago that he was interested in making a similar image. Good luck with the dwarves! :) --Fir0002 10:10, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I second that. Quality and and the whole idea for this picture are really good! A few explanatory words would be interesting. Also could you do some geocoding? It would make your images show up on the GoogleEarth commons layer, and on the WikiMiniAtlas. --Dschwen 16:25, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What is the GoogleEarth commons layer? Hopefully the above is of interest. I might add it to the Guild forum for future reference --Fir0002 10:10, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Check out commons:Commons:Geocoding, the page could be a bit more structured, but there are a couple of examples. Essentially you have to add a commons:Template:Location template to your images. The Geocoding page describes how. There is an URL you can click, which launches either GoogleMaps or GoogleEarth with all geocoded images marked as tiny icons, or you can open the WikiMiniAtlas and see thumbnails of the images at their geo locations on the map. And by the way, excuuuuseee meee???!!!!! That is the view from your HOUSE??!!! Damn it, if I posted a view from my appartment it'd probably get deleted for being ugly. Life's not fair ;-)--Dschwen 16:16, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I do have a nice view :) But that why I'm reluctant to do much in the way of geo coding my images as this would be a bit of an intrusion on my privacy (particularly I don't think my parents would be too happy). I guess I could add the geo tag of Swifts Creek as a generic thing to most of my images if that would help? --Fir0002 06:27, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I can understand that. In this case I'd suggest not geocoding those images as the general idea of the Geocoding project is to geocode the camera location and heading as exact as possible. You have a couple of pictures which are not shot from your house (streets of Swifts Creek), and some from the surrounding region (a couple of Mt. Hothham pics come to my mind), maybe you could add location info to those? Last time I checked GoogleMaps didn't have high resolution sat/aerial pics, otherwise I'd have given it a shot already. --Dschwen 13:12, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Question regarding Image:Popcorn02.jpg

Hi, Fir. Would you mind if I made a silly edit of Image:Popcorn02.jpg (after the manner of lolcats) and uploaded it to Commons under a different filename? I understand the it is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License, so I could do it legally, but I wanted to get your permission first anyways. (Although I would prefer a high-quality image such as this one, I could, if necessary, produce my own photograph, though it would be mediocre. ;-) Anyways, thanks, Iamunknown 05:46, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I uploaded it; see Image:Popcorn02-silly-edit.jpg :) Feel free to edit the image description page ~ Iamunknown 21:45, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

About that guild...

I think a more diplomatic approach would have been to fill up your guild pages with some other peoples contibutions first. In its current state it looks like a shrine to yourself. I know, that's probably not your intention, but I bevieve that's how it's being perceived (see the harsh reactions on FPC talk). --Dschwen 16:25, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

POTD notification

Hi Peter,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:Two-lined gum treehopper03.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on February 6, 2008. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2008-02-06. howcheng {chat} 06:16, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Hey Fir, thanks for you Master Photographer award. It's very kind of you. I admit, I was a little unsure about how to handle it, but then again it is kind of a barnstar on steroids, backed by some concrete criteria. --Dschwen 00:44, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No worries - you deserved it and I'm glad you took it in the right spirit! :-) --Fir0002 08:46, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A warning

[1] Samsara (talk • contribs) 04:13, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Queries from NZ

Hi Peter, I've been in awe of your photos on wikipedia for a while (specifically your bird shots) and having looked at your profile I recalled recently the partnership with naturespics you struck up while trying to work out how to organise a similar arrangement myself. I'm in contact with a botanist in Auckland who has taken some great photos of NZ carnivorous plants ( a few articles on species found here still have no images at all) and he sounds keen on the idea of having them on wikipedia, I'm just not sure how I should approach uploading them - especially in terms of acknowledging that they're not my own shots. Any pointers? Also, I have recently developed an interest in photography having bought my first camera ( a Canon powershot S5 IS; fairly basic I know but you have to start somewhere) - my particular interests are wildlife and landscape photgraphy. Do you have any advice for me as a beginner in these areas? Any help you could give would be greatly appreciated. Hope you guys are having a good summer! (sounds like you are),

Cheers, Kotare (talk) 04:58, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations

Just wanted to say, congratulations on the double degree acceptance. Sounds like a good course —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.237.41.152 (talk) 08:14, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that! :) To be honest I'm quite daunted by it but hopefully I'll manage! --Fir0002 08:44, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Great Images

Just wanted to comment that I think your photos are brilliant! I also like taking nature photos, have a look at my profile to see a few of them if you like. Samasnookerfan (talk) 16:24, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for responding on my talk page Fir002. Unfortunately I can't afford anything more expensive than what i've got - but maybe one day I will! Samasnookerfan (talk) 10:58, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Tour of gippsland final stage pano.jpg

Nice shot - that bend looks familiar though... the source of much inspiration for you, eh? As for the profile you put up for me, yeah looks good, I was going to do that the other day but didn't get a chance, so thanks for that. What double degree did you get into, by the way? Diliff | (Talk) (Contribs) 16:44, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rock Cycle Noise

It was mentioned during the FPC for the Image:Rockcycle.jpg image at here that the alternative version of the picture I created as too much noise in it. I was wondering if you could either fix the problem are tell me how I could go about fixing the problem myself with Photoshop 6. Thanks in advance. --ZeWrestler ^Talk 17:00, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You did a good job on the diagram, thank you--ZeWrestler ^Talk 14:58, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Caterpillar noise

See below for examples from "Alternative 1". I hope this enables you to also find the noisy areas in the Original. Regards, Samsara (talk • contribs) 02:26, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

- Thanks, --Fir0002 02:40, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:Pasture day moth caterpillar.jpg

An image uploaded by you has been promoted to featured picture status

Your image, Image:Pasture day moth caterpillar02.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! MER-C 04:04, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Fir,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:Pasture day moth caterpillar02.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on August 9, 2008. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2008-08-09. howcheng {chat} 05:25, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Guild Members

Hey Fir, not sure if this belongs here or on the Guild Forum. Anyway, I notice that several other users have now got profiles. I happen to be second in the list, simply because I was second to create a profile. Not that it probably matters that much as I don't suppose it's a status ranking or anything, but I thought some of the others probably should be above me in the list. I'd move myself down, but don't how or whether you can do so. What do you reckon? --jjron (talk) 06:47, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm an interesting question I hadn't yet considered. I would say that chronological order is as good way to order as any as it leaves out subjective "ranking" - however I'll leave it up to you, if you want to change your position feel free as I don't think anyone is going to object. --Fir0002 05:18, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Yeah, I was kind of thinking chronological order too, but I was thinking more order of being given the award, rather than order of creating profile. As I said I'm not too sure how to change the ordering (just editing that page doesn't seem to allow it), so I don't know if you can do so. I don't really know why I'm grumbling about being second anyway. :-) --jjron (talk) 11:10, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  - Heh, found it. I think it's in the right order now? --jjron (talk) 11:17, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

POTD notification

Hi Fir,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:Long tongue tachinid fly edit.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on February 18, 2008. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2008-02-18. howcheng {chat} 23:58, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FPC delisting nomination

I have nominated Image:Caterpillar_feeding3.jpg, an image you uploaded, for delisting as a featured picture. I do not feel that this image satisfies Wikipedia's FP standards, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/Caterpillar feeding. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page.. Thank you for your time. Mangostar (talk) 17:43, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Quick Question...

Hi, If I remember correctly, you use adobe camera raw to do your workflow so I figured you might know the answer to this annoyance I've been bothered by for some time. That is, for the life of me, I can't figure out how to make the JPGs saved out of ACR to be sRBG by default. It always reverts to using Adobe RBG and since much of my work is for online use I have no use for adobe RBG. So, if you know how to make it a default that'd save me a ton of time. Thanks -Fcb981(talk:contribs) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

: )

hey, like ur pic. of you, i mean. : P you look alot like Keanu Reeves.ElisaEXPLOSiON ~~talk.~~ 17:52, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

haha i have no idea what the yellow IMOs are, but thanks : ) ElisaEXPLOSiON ~~talk.~~ 12:51, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Monopoly

Hi, I really like your photos and so was looking through your website to see what else you've done. I came across your monopoly board photo [2]. I looked at the monopoly (game) article and thought your photo could be the ideal one for the info box. I should mention that I have no real interest in the monopoly article, I just thought your photo might be suitable. Good luck with your new course. Mehmet Karatay (talk) 10:38, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Request?

Hi, I have a woefully easy request for a photo, if you take them. I want a good picture of a piano. Preferably a grand piano. But you know what looks good, and we need a photo on top of that page! ALTON .ıl 00:42, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

POTD notification

Hi Fir,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:Cessna 182P.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on March 29, 2008. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2008-03-29. howcheng {chat} 22:47, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Here it is

Hey Fir, this is the list I've mentioned that I'd seen somewhere - Wikipedia:List of Wikipedians by number of featured pictures. Reckon it's a little out of date though... :-). And do those figures strike you as correct anyway, even for the time? --jjron (talk) 04:16, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:Heidfeld and Rosberg - 2008 Melb GP.jpg

An image uploaded by you has been promoted to featured picture status

Your image, Image:Heidfeld and Rosberg - 2008 Melb GP.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! MER-C 06:44, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Id check

Do take a look at this note. Shyamal (talk) 10:34, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

POTD notification

Hi Peter,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:Green Grass-Dart.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on April 19, 2008. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2008-04-19. howcheng {chat} 22:02, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:Tricyrtis hirta - blossom top (aka).jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on April 20, 2008. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2008-04-20. howcheng {chat} 22:21, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I do love your images, particularly the insect ones.Great to see another on Picture of the day. Please keep them coming. GameKeeper (talk) 23:15, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Encyclopedia of Life

I stumbled upon your page from clicking on the picture of the day.

I thought you might be interested in this website. Later in 2008 they are going to allow people to contribute to the website.

http://www.eol.org/index

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:A_day_panorama_-_digital_art.jpg

Just wanted to notify you about the little question. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image_talk:A_day_panorama_-_digital_art.jpg A great picture btw! --Rubik's Cube (talk) 09:43, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Melbourne Docklands - Yarras Edge - marina panorama.jpg

Interesting.... have they properly attributed and displayed the licence? ;-) if you get a chance, I'd love to see a photo of the display with my image on the LCDs. Don't go out of your way though, but surely you carry your camera with you 24/7 just in case? ;-) Diliff | (Talk) (Contribs) 10:46, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the pic, was interesting to see what they had done. Looks like they've cropped it considerably around the edges. Evidently haven't adhered to the terms of the license though, which is a bit frustrating, because I'm sure things like this are just the tip of the iceberg. Diliff | (Talk) (Contribs) 12:26, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Not the only one with people and business's failing to properly attributed as per license. I've been in contact with them and no luck. Bidgee (talk) 12:44, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm confused Bidgee.. You contacted Monash regarding my image? Or regarding another image? Or you contacted another organisation about a different image? Diliff | (Talk) (Contribs) 14:50, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  - Sorry. :| I should have worded myself a bit better. Different organisation and image. Bidgee (talk) 21:18, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
(In reply to Fir0002 re my talk page) Yeah, but that isn't really the point is it? They're legally not allowed to use the image unless they adhere to the conditions of the license. Doesn't matter how inconsequential the use of the image is, they're actually breaking the law and can be sued for it. Now we both know I'm not likely to do it, but stil, they should know better. I'm surprised you're so laissez-faire about it considering you have argued for non-commercial licensing on Wikipedia, sell photos online and have had your images nicked in the past. Diliff | (Talk) (Contribs) 09:54, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Photography

Hi I'm planning to start photography as a hobby and I was just wondering if you could give me some advice. Thanks. Σαι ( Talk) 04:03, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like some advice, too. :) - Diligent Terrier (and friends) 22:47, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm I haven't got anything particularly profound to share in terms of general advice - perhaps if you have a more specific question I could answer it better. --Fir0002 00:35, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What kind of camera would you recommend? (Please reply on my talk, if that is OK with you.) - Diligent Terrier (and friends) 00:43, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

POTD notification

Hi Fir,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:Fishing spider autotomy.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on May 7, 2008. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2008-05-07. howcheng {chat} 22:26, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cabbage Moth

Hi, I wanted to make a request, and see if you can help me. I have recently uploaded a non-free image on Wikipedia [3], however, it does not show something that cannot be reproduced by a free image. So, would you please try to get an image just as good, or better than this (at the moment, this is the best image of the Cabbage Moth available, the others have an odd angle, or don't show the whole insect, or the background doesn't differentiate enough from it etc). I guess you'll get a better shot (with wings open), if it's dead, and also if possible, please try to put the insect on the same color background. If you're going to respond to my request, many thanks in advance! diego_pmc (talk) 17:59, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

Hello, Fir0002. You have new messages at Diligent Terrier's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Natures Pic's

I saw in your userpage that you have uploaded some images from this website. I wonder which gallery did you use to upload pictures (to avoid duplicating efforts) OhanaUnited^{Talk page} 22:16, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstars

Is there a Resilience Barnstar?. Chubbennaitor 16:09, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I asked a range of people and it is {{Resilience Barnstar|message ~~~~}}.

Chubbennaitor has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Chubbennaitor 17:37, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

POTD notification

Hi Peter,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:Bullant head detail.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on May 11, 2008. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2008-05-11. howcheng {chat} 06:49, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Graphic designer needed

I'm looking for a skilled graphic designer.

I need an image for a non-barnstar Wikipedia award with the theme "World Traveler".

I was thinking perhaps the following image, without the barnstar, and with the globe (or another one) superimposed over the Wikipedia globe (or the Wikipedia globe superimposed over it) - I'd like to see the world's countries and the puzzle pieces (with the continents more prominent).

The image also needs a passport laying on the surface beneath the globe stand (where its shadow is, but the shadow should be retained as well). The image's background must be transparent (not white like the background of the image below).

File:Interlingual Barnstar.png

Is this something you can tinker around with?

If so, please contact me on my talk page.

I look forward to your reply.

The Transhumanist 17:25, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Transhumanist,

What you describe is possible but would require quite a lot of work as I'd have to extract the stand from the globe etc etc and I'm not able to spend that much time on it. Your best bet is to get in contact with the original creator commons:User:Erin Silversmith who should (hopefully) still have a layered file. Good luck, --Fir0002 00:26, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Erin's not around, but separating the image was easy...

File:Globe stand.png

Making the background transparent was even easier (using the GIMP), but took a few minutes to find the right instructions...

File:Globe stand with transparent background.png

The GIMP supports layering, scaling, and positioning, which makes it easy to add components...

File:Blue Marble in stand.png

File:Blue Puzzle Marble in stand.png

Now all that's needed is the passport.

I just created this passport front cover, from scratch using the GIMP and Image:Wikipedia logo gold.png.

What I'd like to do is lay it down at an angle on the surface below the globe stand. But then it would need pages, because its edge would be showing.

What I need is the above cover integrated with the below picture, which will require changing the size, perspective, and rotation of the new cover so it can be placed on top of this one. Can you do this?

I just started using the GIMP yesterday, so I'm sure you're better at graphics design than me. I'm hoping you know a fast way to do this, so you can whip it out in 10 minutes.

I look forward to your response.

The Transhumanist 00:44, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Transhumanist,

What you describe is possible but would require quite a lot of work as I'd have to extract the stand from the globe etc etc and I'm not able to spend that much time on it. Your best bet is to get in contact with the original creator commons:User:Erin Silversmith who should (hopefully) still have a layered file. Good luck, --Fir0002 00:26, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Passport to the world2.jpg - your style, Image:Passport to the world.jpg - better IMO. No offence but the cut out job on the globe is pretty poor (which is probably why you found it so easy!). Anyway just FYI I'll be going to uni in 20mins so I won't be checking my talkpage till later tonight or tomorrow so if you post a message don't expect a speedy reply. --Fir0002 01:09, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Luckily, it's in it's own layer, so it can be improved later, if need be, though the award image will be rather small, so it probably won't be very noticable anyways. The odd thing I noticed when cutting it out was that the edges blurred into the objects they were next to. If you have any tips on how to better cut out the original globe and barnstar, I'd love to hear them. By the way, nice job on the passport. I'm amazed you did that so fast - it would have taken me hours. Thank you! The Transhumanist 02:48, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The font

What font did you use for "To the World", and how did you make the capitals bigger?

The Transhumanist 02:41, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Photoshoping

Are you also (highly) skilled in Photoshoping (not just photo making)? I would like to ask you a favor. I started retouching this image (*'psd file in a *.rar archive), so that I would make the writing more visible. The problem is that the way I do it'll take a very long time till I finish it. I've already done something, but could you please try and do this for me; this might be good as a reference. But if for whatever reason you won't help me, I think I saw a project where you could ask for images to be retouched, but can't remember where. Can you point it for me? Anyway, if you can, please try and help. diego_pmc (talk) 18:37, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the effort and the time. diego_pmc (talk) 06:31, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Fir0002-Left.gif listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Fir0002-Left.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 06:33, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Grrr

I'm so jealous of all your amazing photos and your beautiful user page. I wish I was even half as skilled as you are in photographing and wiki-designing. YemeniteCamel (talk) 19:13, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Starting over

It turned out that the globe stand (which I got from the Interlingual barnstar) appears to be from a copyrighted image on a commercial retail website.

We either need another globe stand, or some new ideas for a "Wikipedia World Traveler" award.

I look forward to any thoughts or ideas you might have.

The Transhumanist 23:53, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

POTD notification

Hi Fir,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:Senf-Variationen edit2.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on June 12, 2008. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2008-06-12. howcheng {chat} 23:36, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Advice?

Here's the medal we have so far...

How would you improve it?

By the way, is the font used for the Wikipedia logo available anywhere that you know of?

The Transhumanist 00:56, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your Image

I was remodeling my user page and was looking for a nice image to use. I found this sunset FP, and it looks perfect. I hope you don't mind if I use it (you are of course credited on the page). If you'd like me to use a different image, just tell me. Thanks in advance. NauticaShad es 01:48, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tour

Fir, I don't think it was the final stage as your pictures claim - see here. Looks to be stage 5 of 8 on the middle day. Could be worth correcting, or have I got something wrong? --jjron (talk) 09:00, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I actually thought they went to the top of Hotham, but maybe that was the year before. Nonetheless, it didn't sound right that the whole tour ended in Omeo, and it wasn't as I remembered it. I was just wondering if I had the right event, I guess it must be, but August sounds pretty early, seems pretty wintery. Yeah, wouldn't bother updating the FPC nom, don't think anyone's opposing cos of that. --jjron (talk) 14:09, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Master of desaster

WOW, awesome, great - thanks! --Richard Bartz (talk) 13:34, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How i can edit the gallery ? --Richard Bartz (talk) 10:04, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:Assassin bug aug08 02.jpg

An image uploaded by you has been promoted to featured picture status

Your image, Image:Assassin bug aug08 02.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! MER-C 04:54, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A couple of questions

Hi, I noted that you use a sigma 150mm lens for many of your photographs. I am considering the purchase of this lens for among other things the photography of butterflies. Since they are typically moving and one would want a reasonable depth of field, flash would most likely be required. The canon E-TTL2 connecting cord is rather ridiculously expensive for what it is in my view. Would a hot shoe mounted flash with a soft box or similar cause a shadow with the sigma 150mm? How much luck do you think I'd have photographing butterflies in manual mode? (A PC cord cord connection is far cheaper and also more versatile at the expense of E-TTL). Noodle snacks (talk) 10:35, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted image

An image uploaded by you has been promoted to featured picture status

Your image, Image:Flower spider with moth02.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Mww113 (talk) 14:18, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

--Mww113    (talk) 14:18, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:Willy wag tail.jpg

An image uploaded by you has been promoted to featured picture status

Your image, Image:Willy wag tail.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! MER-C 04:08, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image

Email: emilie.gentilhomme@developpement-durable.gouv.fr

Hello. I'm working for the french Minister of Ecology. We are preparing, in collaboration with the Scientific Council for the Natural Heritage and Biodiversity, a free documentation. We are looking for some illustration. The book, which will be free on demand, not on sale, is the second part of a documentation called "biodiversity illustrated\". You can read the first part here : http://www.ecologie.gouv.fr/-CSPNB-.html (In English on the bottom of page) We would be very pleased if we could use one of this picture we found in your website : http://fr.wiki.x.io/wiki/Image:Classical_spectacular07.jpg What is the condition to have rights ? Could it be possible to get a high definition copy ? Thank you for answer. Don\'t hesitate to contact me if you need further detail.

Best regards Emilie Gentilhomme for Veronique Barre Scientific Secretary of Natural Heritage and Biodiversity Council Minister of Ecology Reply Required: Yes —Preceding unsigned comment added by 160.92.130.65 (talk) 09:30, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:Domestic goat kid in capeweed.jpg

An image uploaded by you has been promoted to featured picture status

Your image, Image:Domestic goat kid in capeweed.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! MER-C 04:54, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nice picture. Most of yours, in fact, look like animals shot outside of the photostudio, yet you manage to capture something cool, an anthropomorphized attitude, a rainbow of blacks. It's nice to see pictures on the main page that are fun to look at. --Blechnic (talk) 07:21, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your nice comments Blechnic :) And yeah most of my shots are taken "in the wild" as I live way out in the country. "Rainbow of blacks" - thats a pretty cool phrase! :) --Fir0002 02:47, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Appreciation

I should probably dig up a barnstar or something to go with this, but I just want to say what a credit you are both to this website and to young people generally. Keep up the fantastic work! All the best, Durova^Charge! 10:00, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, we'd like to invite you as a guest at Not the Wikipedia Weekly. :) Durova^Charge! 16:45, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Buff-rumped Thornbill

Hi Peter, hope you are not offended but I took the liberty of editing your image posted earlier today. I just replaced acanthiza with Buff-rumped Thornbill and removed the text from under the image...it isn't neccessary under Taxobox images. Anyway look forward to seeing some more of your pics, keep up the good-work, Aviceda talk 05:48, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:Australian wood duck - male.jpg

An image uploaded by you has been promoted to featured picture status

Your image, Image:Australian wood duck - male.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! MER-C 07:56, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image wanted

Hi. I noticed you commented on this engine image. You may like to comment on the planned new image here Cuddlyable3 (talk) 12:18, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image search/detection

Just thought you might be interested in a free site I stumbled across called TinEye. Its currently a low-key private beta and doesn't catch everything as they're still in the process of scouring the web, but it is extremely easy to use. Theres even a firefox/IE add-in available that lets you right click an image in the browser and it'll automatically find all uses of the image its aware of. Even if theres a watermark, or it has been cropped or edited subtly! Very clever and worth checking out. You need to apply and they'll send you an email when you've been accepted though as its still in beta. Diliff | (Talk) (Contribs) 13:45, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Coca Cola

Hey Fir, I uploaded two restored pictures of the coca cola ad that was suspended about 5 days ago. If you could look it over and see if you can restore the original border that would help a lot. If you think the cropped version is better then that's less work for us both. Thanks for your time. victorrocha (talk) 21:53, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orb_weaver_white_bckgrnd03.jpg

I'm using a rotated version of the image as non-repeated background on my private non commercial site. There is a link to Commons with the text "Thanks to Fir0002 on Wikipedia for the spider photo". --alef (talk) 16:56, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations!

Great job Fir0002, I really enjoy your images. Keep up the good work. I appreciate beautiful photography myself, and am looking to learn more about professional photography. Do you know any good tutorial websites, somewhere where I can learn more about advanced settings like apertures and shutter speeds? --Simpsons fan 66 05:27, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome, thanks! --Simpsons fan 66 07:04, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A Rather Interesting Abuse (?) of Guild Award...

There is a flickr group here that uses the guild award on each photo it invites. There are literally thousands of times the award is put in the image comments of various photos, a good example being this. Anyway, you may be in some way affiliated with the group or have licensed the photo but I thought I'd let you know about it. Really, its not just that they are taking the award but the whole idea of a "Master photographer guild". Best -Fcb981(talk:contribs) 03:07, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, what did you do!? I was keeping my eye on the group yesterday and first the image was deleted (Not surprising) and now, this morning, it seems like the entire group has been deleted or something. You must have said something suitably acidic! ;-) I know you are busy so don't feel obliged to reply, I just wanted to say what you did appears to have been effective (and they got exactly what they deserved) --Fcb981(talk:contribs) 14:26, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And just in case you missed the changes on your watchlist, two people (or possibly the same person, one anon and one registered user) tried to remove both the link to the flickr page and the entire discussion... Possibly the person who nicked your image in the first place? ;-) Diliff | (Talk) (Contribs) 08:55, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And it appears that the group is merely private now, not completely deleted. The image in question is still visible on the second link's page... Diliff | (Talk) (Contribs) 09:47, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I didn't see those edits. That is somewhat alarming... -Fcb981(talk:contribs) 14:40, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi guys - yes I'm happy to say that the user who created the flickr group acted very well in the situation and apologised and promptly deleted the offending group. The flickr user involved (possibly feeling a bit embarrased about the whole thing) was a bit distressed about this discussion on my talkpage, and since I've buried my hatchet I'll leave this reply for a day or two and then speedy archive this discussion. --Fir0002 11:26, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Its not as though your talk page would have caused the Flickr user gross amounts of defamation and notoriety since only Wiki contributors would ever be likely to view it. And I know they were likely uneducated on the etiquette of Wiki discussions, but it was still a bit underhanded to try to remove evidence of the discussion on a page that they were not even involved in. How did they find the discussion in the first place? Diliff | (Talk) (Contribs) 15:11, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think I know how it may have happened, and it is very troubling. As I said above, I was keeping an eye on the group to see what was happening after informing Fir. I had had no contact with the group previous to informing Fir as I thought it possible that he may have been somehow affiliated or had licensed the graphic for their use and I wanted to let Fir handle the situation as he saw fit. Anyway, a day later a post was made on the groups discussion board that basically said there were strange technical problems with the award not displaying and with group access. Again I didn't want to stick my nose in anyone else's matters but after another day and a second post about unexplained technical problems I figured that Fir had reported it to Flickr and they had taken action without notifying the group admins, I wrote a brief message to a admin of the group Steve Page that essentially said I believed the award was a copyright violation and that I had informed the creator. I linked to both the award and this discussion. Steve wrote me back this:

Eric,
Thanks for bringing this to my attention as I had no idea there was a TM infringement with the award code. That may explain a number of things I have been trying to figure out..
Regards,
Steve

I thought that was the end of that but it looks like steve passed that along to robert (It appears robert is the group creator based on a number of things) I suspect it is more than coincidental that the registered user who deleted the stuff off this page is: Robert2505 with a single edit... -Fcb981(talk:contribs) 19:39, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]