User talk:FilmLover72

Your edits on the wiggity wack Sonic Movie

You need to stop reverting the budget info back to $95M. No source has been cited to support it. I already reverted your edit for the same issue twice, see here and see here. If you persist, it would be considered vandalism by this point and you may find yourself blocked. You have been warned. Armegon (talk) 23:34, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok FilmLover72 (talk) 23:36, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What? FilmLover72 (talk) 20:52, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of American films of 2021, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brian Lynch (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:30, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Revert of move from draftspace

Hi, I reverted your move of Draft:List of American films of 2022 into mainspace. The article was originally moved into draftspace pursuant to an AfD that was closed with a consensus that the article not be restored in mainspace until 2021. Pursuant to the AFD closure, I moved the article back into draft namespace. Thank you. Aoi (青い) (talk) 23:02, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about all that, I just wanted to showcase all the movies that are now coming out in 2022 because of COVID-19 delaying all of them. I just want to people to see what movies are now coming out in 2022 FilmLover72 (talk) 23:03, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of American films of 2022 (April 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

Still likely WP:TOOSOON. Also, films in development or films who wikilinks just redirect to another page shouldn't be included per WP:CRYSTAL

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of American films of 2022 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:List of American films of 2022, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 00:59, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, FilmLover72! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 00:59, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Tenet (film). You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. BOVINEBOY2008 19:20, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Tenet (film) has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. BOVINEBOY2008 15:15, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Marvel Cinematic Universe: Phase Four. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Please do not continue adding the information of Jon Watts directing the third Spider-Man film as you have not provided any reliable source that explicitly confirms he has been hired. It may be expected, but there is no harm in waiting for confirmation. Trailblazer101 (talk) 01:13, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Aquaman (film), you may be blocked from editing. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 13:05, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You need to stop changing sourced content. Wikipedia is written according to what the sources says, not what we believe to be true. When two reliable sources says that "DC Entertainment" produced a film, that's what Wikipedia reports. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 13:07, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Look, in my defense, I was only going off but the official reports that say that the DC films production company was involved with the film Aquaman. And if you don’t believe me you can pretty much go anywhere in Wikipedia and it will say Aquaman was made by DC films, not DC entertainment. Because it is also important to mention that that source that says DC entertainment was one of the production companies pine Aquaman that was before DC films was officially established as a film company. And if you don’t believe me on that then you can look it up for yourself on the DC films Wikipedia page and you can also look on the Aquaman IMDB page. FilmLover72 (talk) 13:10, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I guess we’ll to agree to disagree on this. But l please, look further into the whole Aquaman production company situation. Because I’m pretty sure that DC Films produced it, and not DC Entertainment. (As I said earlier, check the DC Films wiki page of the Aquaman IMDB page.) FilmLover72 (talk) 14:27, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Neither Wikipedia nor the IMDb are reliable sources. They are user-generated, so it doesn't matter what they say. Please do not change content to something not found in the cited source. This violates text–source integrity integrity. If the cited source says one thing, do not change it to say another. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 14:41, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fine. FilmLover72 (talk) 14:44, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:MINOR. You are improperly marking the vast majority of your edits as minor, when very few of them are. Grandpallama (talk) 15:08, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize if I’m marking most of my edits as minor, because I don’t know what constitutes as major and minor. Sorry for the inconvenience. FilmLover72 (talk) 15:21, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reading WP:MINOR will help you with the distinction. Happy editing! Grandpallama (talk) 15:49, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at List of Warner Bros. films (2000–present). NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:07, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I promise it won’t happen again FilmLover72 (talk) 09:30, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is neither a minor edit, nor is it a "typo" that you fixed. If you continue to use deceptive edit summaries like this, and misuse the "Minor" checkbox, you're going to end up blocked. Grandpallama (talk) 19:34, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey man I wasn’t aware of what kind of edit it was, I apologize, and it won’t happen again FilmLover72 (talk) 00:21, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Bill and Ted Face The Music main poster.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Bill and Ted Face The Music main poster.jpeg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Masem (t) 13:44, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea what any of that means since I'm only 15. User:FilmLover72 (t) 13:50, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In that case, just don't upload any images. Or you can link them at WT:NFCC and get an OK to upload it before doing so. Copyright violation is a serious legal issue for Wikipedia. If you're not 100 percent sure whether it's acceptable, then don't upload it. Sundayclose (talk) 15:53, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok FilmLover72 (talk) 16:11, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bill and Ted Face The Music main poster.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bill and Ted Face The Music main poster.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:02, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Draft:Untitled Metal Gear Solid film" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Draft:Untitled Metal Gear Solid film. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 25#Draft:Untitled Metal Gear Solid film until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. UnitedStatesian (talk) 20:11, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Draft:Untitled Metal Gear film" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Draft:Untitled Metal Gear film. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 25#Draft:Untitled Metal Gear film until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. UnitedStatesian (talk) 20:12, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at F9 (film). You have to stop changing content without providing explanation or citation. Saying "I added content" but actually changing a date that goes against the currently sourced date is not constructive. BOVINEBOY2008 00:30, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Unbearable Weight of Massive Talent (October 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Hoary were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The draft has not been altered, let alone improved, since it was last submitted. Resubmission without improvement is a waste of reviewers' time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Unbearable Weight of Massive Talent and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The Unbearable Weight of Massive Talent, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hoary (talk) 01:51, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:03, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Who are you people? FilmLover72 (talk) 11:00, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Afterparty (TV series) (November 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Still waiting for broadcast date and advance reception with national coverage.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Afterparty (TV series) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The Afterparty (TV series), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 17:41, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Season's Greetings

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2021!

Hello FilmLover72, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2021.
Happy editing,
Starzoner (talk) 17:55, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

I wish you a Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays! Starzoner (talk) 17:55, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I guess FilmLover72 (talk) 18:52, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

Hello, I'm Facu-el Millo. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. El Millo (talk) 18:36, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year!

	Happy New Year!
	Hello FilmLover72: Did you know ... that back in 1885, Wikipedia editors wrote Good Articles with axes, hammers and chisels? Thank you for your contributions to this encyclopedia using 21st century technology. I hope you don't get any unnecessary blisters. Starzoner (talk) 15:17, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Happy New Year elves}} to send this message

I wish you a prosperous 2021! Starzoner (talk) 15:17, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

Hello, I'm YoungForever. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, WandaVision, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — YoungForever^(talk) 18:03, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Request to update WandaVision's budget number

Now that WandaVision is confirmed as a 9-episode series, can we move up the budget number from "$150 million" to "$225 million", since THR's article on Disney+'s content said each episode of an MCU show cost $25 million to make: https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/features/bob-iger-bets-company-hollywood-s-future-streaming-1247663? Because 9 times 25 equals 225. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MarvelDisney20 (talk • contribs) 18:18, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Man, I’m not in charge of that kind of stuff, so you may want to ask someone else about that. FilmLover72 (talk) 18:39, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Masters of the Universe:Revelation

Hi, I saw you asked Sandstein for help with Draft:Masters of the Universe: Revelation. Sandstein isn't really involved here, the only thing he did was to remove a link to the deleted article Man-At-Arms using a script. What happened was, you incorrectly moved the draft to Wikipedia space instead of article space, a move reverted by Black Kite. You can't move it to main space anyway because it already exists, as a redirect to He-Man_and_the_Masters_of_the_Universe#Sequel_series. And to be honest, I think it is best it if stays as a redirect until the series is actually shown and it gets more coverage. Right now there isn't really anything in your draft that is not already in that section in the He-Man article.-- P-K3 (talk) 21:48, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Masters of the Universe: Revelation (January 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bilorv was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Masters of the Universe: Revelation and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Masters of the Universe: Revelation, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Bilorv (talk) 20:19, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Godzilla: King of the Monsters

Please refrain from changing the critical response from negative to mixed. Two sources have been provided to support the negative response. If you revert it again, it would be considered disruptive editing and you will be reported and blocked. Armegon (talk) 00:22, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. TriiipleThreat (talk) 18:47, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I understand. FilmLover72 (talk) 19:15, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Plot descriptions cannot be copied from other sources, including official sources and IMDb, unless these can be verified to be public domain or licensed compatibly with Wikipedia. They must be written in original language to comply with Wikipedia's copyright policy. On Console Wars (film). — Diannaa (talk) 10:29, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Girlfriend reviews

Hello, FilmLover72. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Girlfriend reviews, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 06:13, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Alien (franchise), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. —Compassionate727 ^(T·C) 20:20, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Resident Evil (TV Series)

Hello, FilmLover72. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Resident Evil (TV Series), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:02, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Links to draft articles

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Legendary Entertainment. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 11:11, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of ICarly (2021 TV series) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ICarly (2021 TV series), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ICarly (2021 TV series) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Masters of the Universe: Revelation (May 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This is a future television series, and does not satisfy television notability for a separate article. Please resubmit when the series broadcasts.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Masters of the Universe: Revelation and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Masters of the Universe: Revelation, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 01:11, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Draft:Green Lantern (TV series), did not appear constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — YoungForever^(talk) 21:28, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

But why? It’s fact that was included in the announcement for Finn Wittrock’s casting as Guy Gardner. If anything, YOU’RE the one who needs to do their research. FilmLover72 (talk) 21:43, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

hello!

Hi FilmLover72, since I'm very unfamiliar with wikitables, can you add Kraven the Hunter (film) to Draft:List of American films of 2023? ChannelSpider (talk) 01:00, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sure FilmLover72 (talk) 06:53, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Texas Chainsaw Massacre (2021 film) (May 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This is still an unreleased film. Please resubmit when the film is released, with Reception information.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Texas Chainsaw Massacre (2021 film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Texas Chainsaw Massacre (2021 film), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 23:52, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Paper Girls (TV series) (June 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Paper Girls (TV series). Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The TV series has not begun broadcasting yet, and future television series are only occasionally sufficiently notable for stand-alone articles. Some of this material can be included in the parent article Paper Girls. Please resubmit this draft after the series begins to broadcast. In the meantime, please update the parent article.

This draft has been declined because of notability concerns. This draft should be resubmitted by addressing the notability concerns in AFC comments or on the talk page of the draft. Do not resubmit this draft without explaining how it satisfies a notability criterion. Do not simply add references, or make minor changes, without explaining how it satisfies a notability criterion.

This does not mean that the subject of the draft has been found not to be notable. It does mean that this draft, as written, does not establish notability. Notability should be established in the text of the draft, as well as by references.

You may ask for advice about the notability criteria at the Teahouse.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Paper Girls (TV series) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Paper Girls (TV series), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 03:34, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Mortal Kombat Legends Battle of the Realms.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mortal Kombat Legends Battle of the Realms.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:20, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:The Last of Us (TV series) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:The Last of Us (TV series). Thanks! Bkissin (talk) 19:42, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Who are you again? FilmLover72 (talk) 19:44, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Hello, I'm Yeeno. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Dave Filoni, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Yeeno (talk) 🍁 23:37, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Film date template

Please don't delete the film date template as you did here. There are instructions on how it is used at Template:Film date. BOVINEBOY2008 15:24, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Console Wars (TV series)

Hello, FilmLover72. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Console Wars (TV series), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:02, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Skull (film) (July 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This is an unreleased film, and does not satisfy the guidelines for future films, which require that production must have satisfied general notability. Please resubmit when the film is released.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Skull (film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Skull (film), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 05:35, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Looking for some advice regarding Draft:Resident Evil (TV series)

I don't edit very often and my familiarity with MoS is outdated. I've been following the TV show for the past two years, and while I've uncovered a lot of information on its production, I don't have anything to reliably cite, and press coverage of the show is loaded with inaccuracies. From keeping my eyes out on Production Weekly, actors' Instagram posts and the like I can confirm the following:

Moonlighting Films was responsible for filming in Western Cape. They were filming from March-June, and all the actors went home the first week of July. This contradicts claims by the press that the show hasn't even begun filming yet.
Moose Jaw Productions is responsible for filming in British Columbia. They're a new company founded last October, and according to Production Weekly are to begin next Wednesday. The press thinks all filming will be done in Western Cape, so again I can't cite any journalists as they're misreporting it.
The TV show is being produced under the name "Inkblot" as a title ruse.
Based on a leak, Nunez is likely playing the role of "Carol", while Smart and Balinska, and Rudolph and Agudong are playing the same characters at different ages. Obviously can't source that.
Incidentally, the press is publishing outdated info on the series' plot. A leaked Netflix synopsis described a town called "Clearfield" which doesn't exist in the show that I'm aware of; now can I find anything on an asylum. This is probably a really outdated pitch, since by the time it leaked out they already had finished scripts.
Rob Seidenglanz directed episodes 3 and 4, while Rachel Goldberg directed 5 and 8. They were certainly in Cape Town at the time. IMDb says Kerry Williamson wrote episode 3, but I'm not sure whether Wikipedia takes IMDb as a source. She'd previously tagged all the writers (and showrunner's assistants) on Twitter.

I hope this info is good for the article.-- OsirisV (talk) 18:02, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I would say it’s worth including, IF your sources are 1.Official and 2.Relaible. If your can back them up, include it. FilmLover72 (talk) 18:10, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Resident Evil (TV Series)

Hello, FilmLover72. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Resident Evil".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:16, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

MOS:AMP

MOS:AMP Please try to avoid unnecessary ampersands, like you did in one of your recent edits.[1] -- 109.78.205.154 (talk) 19:39, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Saints Row (film)

Hello, FilmLover72. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Saints Row (film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:01, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Resident Evil (TV series) (March 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Still a case of WP:TOOSOON. Please do not resubmit until the draft meets WP:NTV.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Resident Evil (TV series) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Resident Evil (TV series), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-Liance^{talk/contribs} 16:34, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

Your edit to The Umbrella Academy (TV series) has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Sariel Xilo (talk) 19:04, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Uncharted Movie Logo.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Uncharted Movie Logo.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 07:37, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Nimona (film)

Please do not remove those involved in the previous stage of production from the infobox. Consensus on the talk page has stated to list them until proven otherwise--CreecregofLife (talk) 00:33, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Saints Row (film)

Hello, FilmLover72. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Saints Row".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:20, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Secondary sources needed: Tom King and Charles Soule

Hi. When adding material to an article, especially if it's in the area for which the subject is notable (like an upcoming work by a writer), please make sure to include citations of secondary sources, and not primary sources. In your recent edit, the citation for the King's upcoming DC Comics book is the publisher themselves, which is inappropriate. In addition to the fact that sources in Wikipedia articles need to primarily be secondary ones, relying on the publisher may violate WP:NOTADVERT. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 13:21, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Please stop adding material supported solely by primary sources, in particular that which goes to a subject's notability, as you did with this edit to Charles Soule. As I explained to you above last month, Wikipedia requires material in an article that goes to the subject's notability to be secondary sources, and not primary sources, both to avoid original research, and to avoid problems of promotionalism. These are core policies, and having accumulated over 3,000 edits in the nearly two years you've been editing here, you should have learned them by now, and should be adhering to them in your editing practices. If you ever have any other questions about editing, or need help regarding the site's policies, just let me know by leaving a message for me in a new section at the bottom of my talk page. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 19:11, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Kyle Higgins into Massive-Verse. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 16:27, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to Untitled Mario film, without good reason. They should have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 18:45, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Dead Day (TV series)

Hello, FilmLover72. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dead Day (TV series), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:42, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Dead Day (TV series)

Hello, FilmLover72. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Dead Day".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:13, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Joshua Williamson (writer)

The article Joshua Williamson (writer) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 19:48, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, just thought I'd let you know that I saw this and am in the process of adding references to the page. FilmLover72 (talk) 19:52, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I added sources/references to the page now. FilmLover72 (talk) 20:37, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Joshua Williamson moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Joshua Williamson, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:26, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! ––FormalDude (talk) 00:33, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at The Last of Us (TV series), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. CastJared (talk) 09:19, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Frank Quitely

Hi. Regarding your edit to Frank Quitely please make sure that sources you cite for material that goes to the subject's notability are secondary sources, not primary sources. Relying on the publisher for this violates both WP:PSTS, and possibly WP:NOTADVERT as well. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 13:34, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nimona (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Annecy Film Festival.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on John Francis Daley

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page John Francis Daley, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 14:23, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Jonathan Goldstein (filmmaker)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Jonathan Goldstein (filmmaker), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 14:23, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:TheFlashMainPoster.jpeg

A tag has been placed on File:TheFlashMainPoster.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- Alex_21_TALK 23:53, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Scott Pilgrim The Anime

On 29 April 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Scott Pilgrim The Anime, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that more than a decade after Edgar Wright assembled the cast of Scott Pilgrim vs. the World, he helped to convince them all to reprise their roles in an anime adaptation of the source material? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Scott Pilgrim The Anime. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Scott Pilgrim The Anime), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

-- RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Joshua Williamson

Hello, FilmLover72. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Joshua Williamson, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:03, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Flash in film

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Flash in film, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 12:23, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Massive-Verse Poster.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Massive-Verse Poster.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:19, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: The Last Ronin (comics) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: The Last Ronin (comics). Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 12:57, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: The Last Ronin (comics) has been accepted

Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: The Last Ronin (comics), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 12:58, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mortal Kombat Legends: Cage Match for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mortal Kombat Legends: Cage Match, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mortal Kombat Legends: Cage Match until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:00, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Uncited material: Ghost Machine (company)

Hi. Please do not add uncited material to articles, as you did with these edits to Ghost Machine. The cited sources for the passages in question make no mention of Mad Ghost, or any rebranding. Wikipedia requires that the material in its articles be accompanied by reliable, verifiable (usually secondary) sources explicitly cited in the article text in the form of an inline citation, which you can learn to make here. Thank you. Nightscream (talk) 00:54, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Regarindg this edit:

1. The parameter in questions is not for universes. It's for publications. Family Odysseys is not the name of a book.

2. "Untilted horror universe" is not a name. It's a description. Therefore, it should not be italicized, nor capitalized as a proper noun.

3. Why does adding those requiring removing the ones that were already there? Nightscream (talk) 19:11, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your disruptive edits have been reverted. Nightscream (talk) 01:24, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ultraman Rising (November 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from https://variety.com/2021/film/news/ultraman-movie-netflix-tsuburaya-shannon-tindle-1234972658/. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:Ultraman Rising may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 08:37, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ultraman Rising (November 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ultraman Rising and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 23:37, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Community: The Movie

Hello, FilmLover72. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Community: The Movie, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:05, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

Your edit to Draft:Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic (2024 video game) has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Undetected copyright on a section with quotes, I am sure that the quote is not minimal. Toadette ^{(Happy holiday!)} 08:31, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note

Copyright problem: Draft:Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic (2024 video game)

Hello FilmLover72! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Draft:Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic (2024 video game), but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted material from other websites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from , and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate your contributions, copying content from other websites is unlawful and against Wikipedia's copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are likely to lose their editing privileges.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

Have the author release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License (CC BY-SA 4.0) by leaving a message explaining the details at Draft talk:Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic (2024 video game) and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-enwikimedia.org". Make sure they quote the exact page name, Draft:Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic (2024 video game), in their email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Draft talk:Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic (2024 video game). See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA), version 4.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Draft talk:Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic (2024 video game) with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text to be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.

Otherwise, you may rewrite this article from scratch. If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Draft talk:Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic (2024 video game) saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Toadette ^{(Happy holiday!)} 08:47, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:UltimateUniverse1.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:UltimateUniverse1.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:37, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Untitled Constantine sequel

Hello, FilmLover72. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Untitled Constantine sequel, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:08, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic (upcoming video game)

Hello, FilmLover72. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic (upcoming video game), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:06, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic (upcoming video game)

Hello, FilmLover72. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hey man im josh (talk) 20:09, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:SpiderMan2PS5BoxArt.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SpiderMan2PS5BoxArt.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:30, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: DC All In (October 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by OlifanofmrTennant was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

See WP:TOO SOON and when It does come out make sure to add reviews and not just a lidst

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:DC All In and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 13:56, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]