User talk:Festoonz

Roy Krenkel

I wasn't sure whether you'd see this if I put it on the talk page, so I'm putting it here. Based on Convention booklets from '72-74, comics and science fiction fanzines from roughly '69 to 86 (most of which have disappeared since I started this stub) and other materials, I originally phrased it, "however the bulk of the attention he got in his lifetime came from..." the Edgar Rice Burroughs covers. Pepso changed it to "Notable..." and I didn't have an issue with that, even though it did alter the meaning somewhat. I precisely don't like your proposed change because most of the older documentation about him is as a Fantasy/Ace Books/DAW Books/Edgar Rice Burroughs illustrator, rather than as a cartoonist. Most of the material about him as a cartoonist was published AFTER his death. At least what I've seen. Jplatt39 (talk) 14:54, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm not sure exactly how to respond to you, so I will add this to your comment. I never said anything about RGK being a cartoonist. In fact, the books I updated and mentioned were books by Lancer and Grant publishing. All in the vein of Burroughs. He did work for EC comics a bit and Warren publishing used him for his creative genius. I actually own the cover to his first burroughs cover, AT THE EARTHS CORE. But everything I added was factual, so I thought that was the whole idea is to tell all information possible about him. Thanks for writing!!! Festoonz (talk) 23:16, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How to Reply

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed you don't know how to reply. There are two ways of how to reply:

The first way is to respond on the other person's talk page. Remember to create a new headline.

The second way is to add a colon ":" on a new line underneath the previous response, and then leave your message.

Have fun on Wikipedia. If you have any comments or questions, respond to me on my talk page. Thanks. --Ŵïllî§ï$2 (^Talk!/_Cont.) 23:23, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Al Cass with this edit do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. - Happysailor ^(Talk) 06:26, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Casarachi (July 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Casarachi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Casarachi, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 09:30, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Festoonz! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Hitro talk 09:30, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Casarachi (July 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Casarachi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Casarachi, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 13:16, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Casarachi (July 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Calliopejen1 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Casarachi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Casarachi, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Calliopejen1 (talk) 05:55, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Casarachi

Hello, Festoonz. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Casarachi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:55, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Alcass1.jpg

The file File:Alcass1.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused page from some kind of scrapbook or yearbook compiled of images which have unclear copyright status. Can't assume GFDL is valid under these circumstances.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 02:18, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]