User talk:FenixFeather/Archives/2014/May
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:FenixFeather. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Please comment on Talk:Sam Harris (author)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Sam Harris (author). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:07, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
US Health Care
I support Wikipedia both with my time and money. I am concerned with the propaganda in the health care section. Statements such as 'the number of uninsured' are not supported nor can they bee supported. Generally, these are conflations of various political goals coming from either or all directions. The political support for a specific method of "reform" is misleading and can't be referenced - it is belo Wikipedia standards. The is a great, even essential need for Americans to understand their health insurance and the provision of health care in the US. Wikipedia can help with that need or carry water for political players. They can't do both. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.143.95.171 (talk) 14:27, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
- @50.143.95.171: I'm not exactly sure what this is in the context of, but if you believe there are neutrality issues with the article, you should bring it up on the article's talk page. – FenixFeather (talk)(Contribs) 16:23, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:The Bible and homosexuality
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:The Bible and homosexuality. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:08, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
deletion inquiry
yes please i'd like a very brief reference on Sorting algorithm main page.
what i wish to do is comply with (demands) however the message i was left was very vague
"because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia"
how can i help you? it is not a valid complaint.
it is an algorithm, isn't a hybrid, and has properties about opposite of mergesort.
"sorting algorithm" is a general topic and you shouldn't in the business of deleting know algortims and keeping the topic to yourself. you should fork a new page if you wish to have a personal collection of only your favorite algorithms.
Navstar55 (talk) 17:31, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
- @Navstar55:If you want to write about a new algorithm, rather than linking to a sourceforge page and attempting to explain it (which violates WP:OR as a synthesis), you should use a reliable third party source in the body of the article that analyzes and explains the topic. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information, which is why we limit topics to only things that are covered by reliable sources. Thanks for your contributions! – FenixFeather (talk)(Contribs) 04:58, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
I answered this kindly in FenixFeather talk page previously.
he has ignored the message, refused to offer any answers to questions asked, and been hostile in return. i had said i wished only a small external link and placed it thinking it would not be a problem after all.
the complaint was very vague and i added a much more brief external link
this person does not own the topic
and i have a complaint he has been deleting valid material from it while promoting invalid material - apprently he is vandalizing the topic. and refuses to open a subtopic or split topic for his fetishes.
i call FenixFeather the vandal.
i furthermore object to his being hostile for a simple lesser, very brief, external link being added
i also feel picked on since Wikipedia is flush with external links which are a valued resource to some: editors and viewers alike
Mr. Fleix please leave me and my materials alone.
you have heisted a topic, ignored my request for a small link, replied in a hostile manner to a kind request, and refuse to split the topic
leave me alone — Preceding unsigned comment added by Navstar55 (talk • contribs) 21:15, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
- Fenix: feel free not to take offence at this. I think you were more than helpful. :) GDallimore (Talk) 21:19, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
- Navstar, I apologize if I've offended you. But thanks for the support, GDallimore, I appreciate it! :) – FenixFeather (talk)(Contribs) 21:37, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Venomous snake
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Venomous snake. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Malakia
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Malakia. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Richard C. Hoagland
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Richard C. Hoagland. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 01:15, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:29, 28 May 2014 (UTC)