User talk:Fauxjobing

April 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, please do not add promotional material to articles or other Wikipedia pages. Using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" is against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 11:11, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 22:32, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Jobing.com

Please stop adding uncited material to the Jobing.com article. Nothing you are adding is verifiable and is clearly heavily influenced by your own personal opinions. Your user name alone makes the purpose of your edits clear and suggests strongly you have a conflict of interest in editing this article. So your claims of "wanting to keep the community clean" are rather disingenuous when your concerns are more obviously about getting your own opinions across on this one particular subject.

Also, adding Twitter links is not acceptable, see point 10 here.

If you can find a reliable source that covers the events you say occurred, and verifies the claims you are making, then they can be added, if expressed neutrally. Thanks. --Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 18:19, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As a private entity, they are not required to report this information. It is factual information that is presented in a manner that does not harm the entity in anyway. It provides a clear picture that is unbiased and balances the clear promotional material previously provided by the company pr. If you remove the recently added content, the other content should be removed. It is biased and out of date.

... according to you and in your opinion. Everything you're adding is not verified by anything other than you saying "It's true, you have Fauxjobing's word on it." Can you see the problem with this?

Can you not also appreciate that reports of uncommunicative management, laying off of "best" employees and going back on previous statements could just possibly be seen as biased and negatively impact the company ? Is it not unreasonable to insist that we therefore do everything to ensure it is fair and accurate? --Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 15:30, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I accept your rationale and since I cannot substantiate with verifiable documentation my update is not valid. While I know the information I provided is accurate, I cannot provide independent documentation and I will abide by your changes. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.46.107.203 (talk) 15:29, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]