User talk:FarahHaneef17

Welcome!

Hi FarahHaneef17! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! VQuakr (talk) 16:11, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:Everipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. VQuakr (talk) 16:22, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did at Everipedia, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. VQuakr (talk) 17:32, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Everipedia

Kindly don't voice assumptions about what I agree with, thanks. A discussion isn't "won" by whoever replied most recently. VQuakr (talk) 16:18, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Lectron Charger.png

Thanks for uploading File:Lectron Charger.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:30, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Lectron Logo.png

Thanks for uploading File:Lectron Logo.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:30, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lectron EV

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Lectron EV, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:40, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Onel5969 I noticed that the page I created has been subject to speedy deletion. please unblock my account from editing so that I can make the appropriate edits and avoid any kind of promotion on the page i created. Besides, i would like other editors to review the page before i move it for publication. Thank You. FarahHaneef17 (talk) 09:29, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I am not the one that blocked you. And I am not an admin. If you wish to appeal your block, follow the instructions given below. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 09:32, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Onel5969 oh sorry for the confusion. can you please provide me some assistance regarding the deletion of the page i created. any piece of advice from your side will be helpful. FarahHaneef17 (talk) 13:30, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 17:34, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Bbb23, I checked that you have blocked me from making edits. Apologies for the inconvenience caused. Can you please unblock my account so that I can rewrite the changes and ensure I don't make any disruptive edits in the future. I am still learning. Thank You for your assistance. FarahHaneef17 (talk) 09:10, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Do not send me any more e-mail. If you wish to be unblocked, follow the instructions in the block notice.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:29, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Bbb23 i have followed the instructions in the block notice but haven't recieved any response yet. FarahHaneef17 (talk) 13:58, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You need to follow the directions given in the block, specifically request an unblock here using this: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Copy and paste the unblock template, then fill in your reasoning to be unblocked and an admin will review it. RickinBaltimore (talk) 14:03, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Lectron Logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lectron Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:16, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

FarahHaneef17 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

When I created the page for Lectron on Wikipedia, I did not realize that I have mistakenly made any disruptive editing since I am new to this Wikipedia editing and want to learn more about it and its guidelines to prevent myself from making further mistakes in future editing. I request you unblock my account so that I can edit the Lectron EV page that I created. I apologize for the inconvenience. This might have happened because I am new to Wikipedia and still learning to make appropriate edits and page creation. I will be grateful if you unblock my account and walk me through this issue.FarahHaneef17 (talk) 04:48, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 11:18, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

FarahHaneef17 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am writing this appeal with utmost sincerity and a strong desire to address the concerns that led to the blocking of my Wikipedia account. I have reflected upon my past actions and understand the reasons for the block, and I assure you that I am fully committed to making valuable contributions to the Wikipedia community.

I acknowledge that my previous editing behavior was disruptive, and I deeply regret any inconvenience or damage it may have caused to Wikipedia. I also realize that Wikipedia relies on the collaborative efforts of its contributors to maintain a high standard of accuracy and reliability, and my actions were in contradiction to this principle.

During the period of my block, I have taken the time to educate myself about Wikipedia's policies, guidelines, and the expectations placed upon its contributors. I have familiarized myself with the guidelines regarding neutrality, disruptive editing and reliable souring. I now have a comprehensive understanding of the community's objectives and the significance of adhering to these principles.

I genuinely acknowledge the negative impact my previous disruptive editing had on Wikipedia. I assure you that I have learned from my mistakes and am committed to rectifying my behavior in my future editings. I recognize the importance of quality contributions and commit to researching and verifying information thoroughly, adhering to the highest standards of accuracy. Besides, I understand that the primary reason for the block was to prevent further damage or disruption to Wikipedia. I want to emphasize that I am fully aware of the consequences of my previous actions and the negative effects they had on the community. I sincerely apologize for any inconvenience caused. Rest assured, I am committed to avoiding any similar disruptive behavior in the future. I will exercise caution, seek guidance when needed, and collaborate constructively with other editors to contribute positively to Wikipedia.

Once my account is unblocked, I intend to utilize my skills and knowledge to enhance the Wikipedia community. I am particularly interested in focusing on subjects where I have expertise, as I firmly believe that sharing accurate and reliable information can greatly benefit readers and researchers. I will actively participate in discussions, provide well-reasoned arguments, and engage in the improvement of existing articles as well as the creation of new ones, always in accordance with Wikipedia's guidelines and policies.

I humbly request that you reconsider the block on my Wikipedia account. I assure you that I have learned from my past mistakes and am committed to conducting myself in a responsible, respectful, and constructive manner. FarahHaneef17 (talk) 13:27, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I don't see a single thing in this request which indicates that you actually know why you were blocked. It's entirely vague and non-specific. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 13:59, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

FarahHaneef17 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

As per my understanding, it is no longer necessary to have my account blocked because it was primarily blocked upon the accusation of causing disruptions, which is absolutely not the case. Neither have I caused any damage, nor have I caused any disruption so it becomes redundant to have my account blocked any further. Additionally, my track record indicates that I have been making useful contributions which I intend to keep doing so. Again, I understand the reason for which my account was blocked, which was not correct. I caused no damage or disruption. Kindly have my account unblocked. Thanks and regards,

Decline reason:

Since you don't think you have done anything wrong, there are no grounds to remove the block. As these requests are not making progress,(and are going backwards if anything, since you earlier said you were disruptive but now say you weren't) I have decided to remove talk page access. That will leave you with WP:UTRS for further appeals. 331dot (talk) 14:51, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.