User talk:Ertarunz7

March 2020

Hello, I'm MrOllie. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. [1] MrOllie (talk) 12:10, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, unfortunately that was not promotional I came through that LinkedIn article so though of adding that here. Maybe my way of telling that story was not right. Can you please let me know how can I add that here as that seems to be a very effective use of QR Code in the life saving drug development

industry and to save paper and hence protects the environment too. I wanted that people from other industries too to adopt something like that to save the paper making the things simpler too. Thanks Ertarunz7 (talk) 18:51, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to QR code. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. — Mike Novikoff 06:16, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did at QR code, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. Apparition¹¹ ^Complaints/Mistakes 11:17, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In reply to your email

Hello. You would need to show that it is important enough to include by supplying reliable, third party sources discussing this use in order for a discussion to really even begin using it. After providing these sources on the article talk page, editors may agree or disagree to include it. If they feel the sources are good enough, it could be included, but it would definitely be without the external link to the company and probably without mention of the company at all. Apparition¹¹ ^Complaints/Mistakes 14:30, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]