User talk:Epifanove

Talk -Epifanove^🗯️ 11:12, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Signature

Much easier to read. David notMD (talk) 02:29, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

lovely Epifanove^(TALK) 11:13, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Refs

References do not need to be available on line. Hence, can cite books! David notMD (talk) 08:16, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Epifanove! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Tails Wx 21:58, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you :) Epifanove^💬 22:01, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User Warning

This was probably an accident, but for the future, make sure that my username is not used when you are giving editors warnings. If you want to warn people easier, I'd recommend you use a tool like Twinkle. TheManInTheBlackHat (Talk) 12:38, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, thats really odd. I used the vandalism1 template and it showed up as my username. Epifanove^💬 12:40, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Weird, not sure why that's acting that way. TheManInTheBlackHat (Talk) 12:41, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jut FYI

Hi, keep up the good anti-vandalism work. Just bear in mind that warning templates need to substituted. As TMITBH says above, Twinkle will save you a lot of typing, and it has custom warnings for different kinds of problem edits. What I actually came here to say was that we have a much lower tolerance for commercial spam than we do for childish vandalism so if you spot someone adding spam links to multiple pages, feel free to report them straight to AIV. Best, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 13:45, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I see, I'll use Twinkle in that case.

Will also report straight to AIV from now on, thank you for the information. Epifanove^💬 14:25, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Only for the really obvious spammers though. Everyone else gets a couple of chances before we drop the banhammer on them. :) HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:36, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unless they're an LTA, they've already had their chances so they get the banhammer immediately. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 16:56, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

LTA? Epifanove^💬 17:00, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, short for Long-term abuse. Some of them have thier own LTA page here on Wikipedia (see WP:LTA), however we've stopped creating them in recent years from what I"ve noticed since it tends to just give them more attention which is a violation of WP:DENY. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 17:01, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ah alright, good to know. Does seem a good idea to not dedicate pages to vandals anymore, even though Wikipedia:Deny recognition isn't official policy it has a very good point. Epifanove^💬 17:22, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yep! By the way, if you want any help with making your signature better, feel free to ask me. I'm more than willing to help you. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 17:24, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Haha are you implying that it sucks currently? Jokes aside I would actually like to have it in dark green, but when I tried to add that in CSS it didn't seem to work. If you could show me how to do that I'd be very grateful, thanks :) Epifanove^💬 17:27, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm... it seems that for whatever reason the link color is overriding the text color. I'll see what I can do. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 17:41, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'll ask at WP:VPT cause I have no clue why the link color is overriding the color of the text that it's set to. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 17:44, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe something like a:visited { color: red; } could work? Epifanove^💬 17:46, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I ran some tests on my sandbox, unfortunately nothing worked while comparing to Salvio giuliano's signature. Tails Wx 18:10, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback granted

Hi Epifanove. After reviewing your request, I have enabled rollback on your account. Please keep the following things in mind while using rollback:

Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle or RedWarn.
Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
Rollback should never be used to edit war.
If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 10:54, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Mitchell, will do my best! Epifanove^🗯️ 11:11, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Free State Gold Rush

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Free State Gold Rush you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Johannes Schade -- Johannes Schade (talk) 22:02, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Johannes Schade that is great to hear, thank you. Epifanove^🗯️ 11:08, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Epifanove, I am glad we have at last made contact. Please, do not get discouraged by my negative remarks on the review. Perhaps, I was too much influenced by your low edit count and felt that you nominated a GA too early in your career. You seem to be a vertical starter; you have created three articles and are already into administrative activities as a rollbacker. Of course these circumstances should not influence the GA review. I myself am not a very experienced wikipedian and my experience is almost exclusively in biographies. I have only two GAs. Let us dicuss on the review page, i.e. Talk:Free State Gold Rush/GA1. Best regards, Johannes Schade (talk) 20:08, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Of course I am not discouraged, I am grateful you took the time to give feedback on the article I wrote. Im finding myself inordinately burdened with work recently, but I hope I will find the time to evaluate your remarks in-depth. Thank you! Epifanove^🗯️ 20:50, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Free State Gold Rush

The article Free State Gold Rush you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Free State Gold Rush for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Johannes Schade -- Johannes Schade (talk) 11:44, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dalbit Petroleum for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dalbit Petroleum is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dalbit Petroleum until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

MrsSnoozyTurtle 05:57, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A Dobos torte for you!

7&6=thirteen (☎) has given you a Dobos torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it.

To give a Dobos torte and spread the WikiLove, just place {{subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

7&6=thirteen (☎) 13:44, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Zenith Energy for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zenith Energy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zenith Energy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

MrsSnoozyTurtle 00:06, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Zenith energy

Hello, Epifanove. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Zenith energy, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:02, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023 Good Article Nominations backlog drive

Good article nominations \| August 2023 Backlog Drive
August 2023 Backlog Drive: On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. (t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse host - belated welcome

Dear Epifanove,

Thank you for volunteering as a Host at the Teahouse. Wikipedia is a community of people working together to make knowledge free. You are an important part of that effort! By joining as a Host, and by following our expectations, you are helping new users to get started here at Wikipedia, and aiding more experienced users who just have a question about how something works. We appreciate your willingness to help!

Here are some links you may find helpful as a Host:

Useful scripts you can install to make responding easier,
templates to use and, of course:
the question forum itself.

Editors who have signed up as hosts, but who have not contributed at the Teahouse for six months or so may be removed from the list of hosts.

My apologies for the extremely belated welcome. You've made 26 useful contributions to the Teahouse thus far!

Cheers, Nick Moyes (talk) 20:18, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024 GAN backlog drive

Good article nominations \| March 2024 Backlog Drive
March 2024 Backlog Drive: On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here or ask questions here.
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]