User talk:Emico

[Archive June 25, 2005]--Emico 17:37, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Arbitration Committee case opening

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Emico has been accepted and is now open. Please bring evidence to Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Emico/Evidence. Thank you. -- sannse (talk) 19:02, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Watchlist screwed

My watchlist does not update. I don't see them at all! I wonder if anyone else having this problem? --Emico 1 July 2005 15:48 (UTC)

Christianity

Hi Emico: At Talk:Iglesia ni Cristo you expressed reservations about the Christian article and suggested that Wiktionary:Christian was better. Please could you explain the problems that you see with the Wikipedia article?—Theo (Talk) 4 July 2005 17:27 (UTC)

Still on break

Hi all, I'm still taking a break from a lot of things, including wikipedia. My apologies. I pop in and out quickly whenever I succumb to weakness ;). Best to all. Belated Happy Anniversary to all my brethren! Watch our program on TV!! --Emico 18:21, 30 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

Tahank you. —Theo (Talk) 16:20, 16 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Good Reading

I stumbled upon this (Please do not bite the newcomers) today, flagged by my watchlist. I ask anyone who comes across this post to read the article. Also see User:Filiocht's page for wiki attitudes to adopt.
I removed this from where I originally posted it as it might be misinterpreted. As for the time, I'll do it. As the saying goes, don't do the crime, blah, blah ... --Emico 18:45, 18 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Final decision

The arbitration committee has reached a final decision in Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Emico →Raul654 20:06, August 21, 2005 (UTC)

Sent you an email

check your hotmail. Respond to my dslextreme account(ghart@)

emails bounced. write me. - gabby

I got all you emails but like I said I'm ataying away from wikipedia and the forums.

To IB/OTF, apology accepted. please accept mine as well.

To all my brods and sis, do you have doubts? read these:

NLT - Jhn 6:68 - Simon Peter replied, "Lord, to whom would we go? You alone have the words that give eternal life.

Rom 6:23 For the wages of sin [is] death; but the gift of God [is] eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.

Jhn 17:3 And this is life eternal, that they might know thee the only true God

- peace- Emico 17:06, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Staying away does not really help. You really should respond.

Emico, I've emailed you at EmicoLantaran@hotmail.com

I rescind my offer. You are nothing but a petty liar and slanderer.--Ironbrew 04:57, 12 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ouch. I didn't want to hear that!... --LBMixPro ^<Sp ^e ^ak|on|it!> 12:35, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

great display Ironbrew/Onlytofind :)

Onlytofind placed on personal attack parole

1) Onlytofind is placed on personal attack parole for one year. quoted from Can't resist? ~ShameOnYou

Barnstar

liars get it. It's worthless.

Manigong Bagong Taon

Mahal na kapatid,

Isang maalab na pagbati sa iyo sa papasok na taon. Saan ka man naroroon ngayon, maligayang pagbati. ~iNceRz4eVa

Last chance!

Thanks for trying to contribute to Wikipedia, I'm letting the latest edit pass for the sake of improving the encyclopedia. This whole thing has gone on long enough, and frankly it is getting nowhere. There are ways to find out whether or not a sockpuppet is created or not. If you are willing to edit Wikipedia according to policy, I can vouch to have your arbcom ban waived and for you to be put under mentorship by another admin. I know you have the decency and intellegence to make the right choice. You've shown in the past that you are able to cooperate.

Wikipedia is and has always been a secular encyclopedia, open to all editors and viewpoints who are willing to work within the Wikimedia Foundation's goal. The article need expansion, and I'm not capable to edit as much as I am able to. Other members of INC (current and former) do have the information and ability to. However, if you return my favor by causing trouble around the encyclopedia, I will push a community ban against you. Please make the right choice. It's up to you. --LBMixPro <Speak|on|it!> 00:43, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:02, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]