Jump to content

User talk:EliotAndrews

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

License tagging for Image:Yoshis island 2 boxart.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Yoshis island 2 boxart.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:09, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Satellaview.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

The file also doesn't have a copyright tag, so one must be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:03, 27 July 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Anomie 04:03, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Satellaview.jpg)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Satellaview.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:01, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:SatellaviewwithSuperFamicom.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:SatellaviewwithSuperFamicom.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 01:10, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

Warnings

[edit]

August 2007

[edit]

Wikipedia's image use policies require that all images specify source and copyright information. Please stop uploading images without this information, and please stop adding such images to articles. If you continue to do upload images without the necessary information, you may be blocked from editing. Anomie 19:37, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Mega Man III (DOS). Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use Wikipedia:Sandbox for test edits. Thank you. Kariteh 08:50, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:SatellaviewwithSuperFamicom.jpg)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:SatellaviewwithSuperFamicom.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 09:17, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Toonces.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Toonces.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 04:07, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:SatellaviewSet.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:SatellaviewSet.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 03:09, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

Duplicate images uploaded

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:FearEffect33.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:FearEffect3.jpg. The copy called Image:FearEffect3.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 00:45, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:FearEffect2.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:FearEffect2.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 01:06, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Feareffectinferno.PNG

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Feareffectinferno.PNG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 02:06, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:FearEffectInfernoBox.png

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:FearEffectInfernoBox.png. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:05, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:FE3 01.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:FE3 01.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 04:07, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

Your boxart for Fear Effect 3

[edit]

I noticed on Image:FE3 Box.png, you said that you made the image. I think it would be great to keep the image, but to do so, you need to decide how it can be used. This can be confusing, so most artists usually allow their images to be used the same way as text, by adding {{GFDL-self}} to the image page. If you don't like that one, the other common ones can be found at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#For image creators. If you need help, reply here, or on my talk page. -- kenb215 talk 04:20, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Question

[edit]

Why did you remove the Trivia warning for the Doom 64 article? Lots42 03:15, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]


[edit]
Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Yoshis island 2 boxart.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 04:21, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Forgive me. I've been an idiot.

[edit]

Hey. It's me. Power_Box. As you've probably guessed, I'm a huge Yoshi's Story fan... and I guess I was more obnoxious about that then I ever imagined. Too obnoxious this time. I just got a notice from Wiki about my recent actions in trying to change the Yoshi's Story article. I shouldn't have just made those edits...

I better explain my actions. You see, when I saw the parts of the reception section where the Virtual Console reviews were "more accurate" and "further verified the negative inpact the game had on the Yoshi's series" as well as the parts where Nintendo stopped directly referencing Yoshi's Story, making it's "failure" clearer... I didn't like it. I always scoured the Internet for player's reactions to Yoshi's Story and there were a lot of positive ones. I couldn't help but feel that those parts of your article were therefore not as much facts, but predictions.

Don't get me wrong, if this is someone's opinion I respect it and understand that I probably can never change it. But this is Wikipedia, an encyclopedia website that people go to learn stuff AND an encyclopedia website where anyone can edit the articles. So I joined Wikipedia in hope of editing the Yoshi's Story article. At first, I got scared of doing that because I wasn't totally sure what would be considered right or wrong to the staff. But I eventually decided to be bold and try editing the article to my own liking. And if someone tries to edit my edit, I'll edit back. I thought my methods would be okay because I typed facts.

But deleting your parts of the article just because I didn't like them and thought they wern't good... was wrong. Very wrong. I should've just talked to you in the beginning about editing the article before I went ahead and did it. Maybe we could've worked out an agreement. I didn't realize I was being extremely rude. I didn't think about how impolite my actions could be.

So from the bottem of my heart... I'm sorry for all the trouble I gave you in the past couple of days. I hope you can forgive me for what I did. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Power Box (talkcontribs) 04:35, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry it took me this long to reply...

[edit]

Power_Box here. I thank you so much for accepting my apoligy. I too felt much better about all this after I read your reply. The reason it took me so long to reply back was because I wasn't sure if I was supposed to.

Anyways, I guess I'm writing this because I wish to ask a question. Do you think I could still edit the Yoshi's Story article in a way which I don't really delete anything... but maybe change it a bit so as to explain that it is uncertain whether Nintendo has cut ties with Yoshi's Story or not, as well as mention that it's a Player's Choice title and how it didn't strive to be Yoshi's Island (wait, did it already mention that?) and etc.? I don't like those parts of the article that make it's negative impact sound like the biggest fact you should know, so I figured this idea here would work well because it's basically a compramise. I'm asking this because that note from the "Yoshi's Story team" still scares me a little.

This is probably stupid. I know you said you'd ask the team about a less negative opinion for me, but... yeah. I'm not exactly sure what to do.

--Power Box (talk) 05:46, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I apoligize again. I've tried editing it just now.

[edit]

Perhaps if you edit a talk page right after you post a new message there, you don't get notified of a new message. 'Cause that's kinda what I did. Otherwise, I decided to edit the Yoshi's Story article and finished just now. If you did get my message earlier and haven't gotten to replying yet, then I ask that you forgive me.

Anyways, I thought you'd want to take a look at what I had done and see if it was okay or not. You have a LOT more experiance at this than me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Power Box (talkcontribs) 04:20, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much!

[edit]

Somewhat belated, but thank you for keeping some of the edits I made and changing them into better ones! It feels good knowing I was able to add something that most everyone are happy to keep. In a way, you and your team have taught me quite a lot about how to edit things properly here. I might edit other stuff after all, now that the Yoshi's Story article less negative. Anyways, thanks so much for everything! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Power Box (talkcontribs) 22:50, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Eliot, I have reverted your malformed nom from WP:FAC, and will next begin correcting the nomination files, which you haven't done correctly. Can you hold off, and explain what you're trying to do, because you aren't doing it correctly. I will follow your page, so you can reply here. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 01:08, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have requested admin help in restoring the article that you moved, and in correcting the malformed nom. Looking over the article, I suggest that reconsider the nomination to WP:FAC, and consider WP:PR or WP:GA instead. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 01:27, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yoshi's story

[edit]

Revert again and you will be in violation of WP:3RR, which will result in a block. Punctured Bicycle (talk) 03:18, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And which member of the "Yoshi's Story Wiki Project Team" keeps deleting my comments in "childish anger" ([1],[2], [3])? In any case, User:EliotAndrews is a single account and will continue to be treated as an individual.
I have every right to remove information that is not supported by reliable sources. As Wikipedia's founder has put it: "I can NOT emphasize this enough. There seems to be a terrible bias among some editors that some sort of random speculative 'I heard it somewhere' pseudo information is to be tagged with a 'needs a cite' tag. Wrong. It should be removed, aggressively, unless it can be sourced." Please do everyone a favor and read Wikipedia:Verifiability, Wikipedia:No original research, and Wikipedia:Neutral point of view thoroughly before you call my edits vandalism. Punctured Bicycle (talk) 17:16, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ninja Gaiden and KAGE

[edit]

You wrote "However, due to the vast dissimilarities between the two game engines, as well as the different platforms the two appear on (NES for Shadow of the Ninja and the original Game Boy for Ninja Gaiden Shadow.), this rumor has been proven false."

I removed it since it hasn't been "proven" "false" as far as I know. You didn't provide any sources or references. I cited information on people who worked on both games. They were made at Natsume's Nagoya division.Sunnan (talk) 09:58, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Yoshis island 2 boxart.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. IngerAlHaosului (talk) 16:19, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:FE3 01.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:FE3 01.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. King of 08:05, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:FE3 02.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:FE3 02.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. King of 08:06, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:FE3 03.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:FE3 03.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. King of 08:06, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!